These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

62 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8069272)

  • 21. A description of the Southern Rural Access Program's practice management strategies.
    Adams GL; Holloman CE; Nye JM; Salain R; Glenn KG; Harrison S; Patterson MM
    J Rural Health; 2003; 19 Suppl():314-20. PubMed ID: 14526514
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Drug abuse treatment on demand in San Francisco: preliminary findings.
    Guydish J; Moore L; Gleghorn A; Davis T; Sears C; Harcourt J
    J Psychoactive Drugs; 2000; 32(4):363-70. PubMed ID: 11210197
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Participatory monitoring and evaluation within a statewide support system to prevent adolescent substance abuse.
    Schultz JA; Pandya S; Sims M; Jones JA; Fischer S
    J Prev Interv Community; 2013; 41(3):188-200. PubMed ID: 23751062
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Effects of the Strategic Prevention Framework State Incentives Grant (SPF SIG) on state prevention infrastructure in 26 states.
    Orwin RG; Stein-Seroussi A; Edwards JM; Landy AL; Flewelling RL
    J Prim Prev; 2014 Jun; 35(3):163-80. PubMed ID: 24619188
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Community-oriented primary care. Implementation of a national rural demonstration.
    Kukulka G; Christianson JB; Moscovice IS; DeVries R
    Arch Fam Med; 1994 Jun; 3(6):495-501. PubMed ID: 8081528
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. The development and implementation of an acute traumatic wound guideline.
    Stephen-Haynes J; Downing P;
    Br J Community Nurs; 2003 Mar; 8(3 Suppl):8-16. PubMed ID: 12682611
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. An implementation story: moving the GAIN from pilot project to statewide use.
    Gotham HJ; White MK; Bergethon HS; Feeney T; Cho DW; Keehn B
    J Psychoactive Drugs; 2008 Mar; 40(1):97-107. PubMed ID: 18472669
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. An empirical case study of the effects of training and technical assistance on community coalition functioning and sustainability.
    Keene Woods N; Watson-Thompson J; Schober DJ; Markt B; Fawcett S
    Health Promot Pract; 2014 Sep; 15(5):739-49. PubMed ID: 24662898
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Fighting back against substance abuse: are community coalitions winning?
    Hallfors D; Cho H; Livert D; Kadushin C
    Am J Prev Med; 2002 Nov; 23(4):237-45. PubMed ID: 12406477
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. The Healthy Kids, Healthy Communities national program.
    Strunk SL; Bussel JB
    J Public Health Manag Pract; 2015; 21 Suppl 3():S1-3. PubMed ID: 25828210
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. A Training Model for Implementing Hepatitis Prevention Services in Substance Use Disorder Clinics: A Qualitative Evaluation.
    Hagedorn HJ; Rettmann N; Dieperink E; Knott A; Landon BE
    J Gen Intern Med; 2015 Aug; 30(8):1215-21. PubMed ID: 25903992
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Perceptions of mission-critical organizational resources: a survey of substance prevention and treatment agencies in the southwest.
    Hodge DR; Cardenas P; Montoya H
    Soc Work; 2001 Oct; 46(4):341-9. PubMed ID: 11682975
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. US aims to cut supply and demand in war on illicit drugs.
    Korcok M
    CMAJ; 1987 Feb; 136(4):428-9. PubMed ID: 3815207
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Fighting back or fighting themselves? Community coalitions against substance abuse and their use of best practices.
    Green LW; Kreuter MW
    Am J Prev Med; 2002 Nov; 23(4):303-6. PubMed ID: 12406485
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Need for a scientific basis for alcohol-involved problem prevention including a consideration of cost and effectiveness.
    Holder HD
    Subst Use Misuse; 1997 Jan; 32(2):203-9. PubMed ID: 9044548
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Health promotion mini-grants: grassroots implementation in New Mexico.
    Forster-Cox SC; Wiese WH; MacLean TA
    Am J Health Promot; 1996; 10(3):183-4. PubMed ID: 10163297
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Zero effects in substance abuse programs. Avoiding false positives and false negatives in the evaluation of community-based programs.
    Rindskopf D; Saxe L
    Eval Rev; 1998 Feb; 22(1):78-94. PubMed ID: 10183302
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. The Drug Abuse Program at Milwaukee County Institutions. A six-month report.
    Wiesen RL; Wang RI; Stemper TJ
    Wis Med J; 1970 May; 69(5):141-4. PubMed ID: 5447077
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. [On the path of scientific technical progress].
    Pavlov MI
    Voen Med Zh; 1984 May; (5):17-8. PubMed ID: 6464380
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Zero effects of drug prevention programs: issues and solutions.
    Brown JH; Kreft IG
    Eval Rev; 1998 Feb; 22(1):3-14. PubMed ID: 10183300
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.