These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
125 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8069283)
1. Qualitative differences in response bias from spatial cueing. Müller HJ Can J Exp Psychol; 1994 Jun; 48(2):218-41. PubMed ID: 8069283 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Spatial and temporal effects of spatial attention on human saccadic eye movements. Crawford TJ; Muller HJ Vision Res; 1992 Feb; 32(2):293-304. PubMed ID: 1574846 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Graded Neuronal Modulations Related to Visual Spatial Attention. Mayo JP; Maunsell JH J Neurosci; 2016 May; 36(19):5353-61. PubMed ID: 27170131 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The relationship between covert and overt attention in endogenous cuing. Van der Stigchel S; Theeuwes J Percept Psychophys; 2007 Jul; 69(5):719-31. PubMed ID: 17929695 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Modulating the attentional bias in unilateral neglect: the effects of the strategic set. Bartolomeo P; Siéroff E; Decaix C; Chokron S Exp Brain Res; 2001 Apr; 137(3-4):432-44. PubMed ID: 11355388 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Facilitation and inhibition arising from the exogenous orienting of covert attention depends on the temporal properties of spatial cues and targets. Maruff P; Yucel M; Danckert J; Stuart G; Currie J Neuropsychologia; 1999 Jun; 37(6):731-44. PubMed ID: 10390035 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Bias-free double judgment accuracy during spatial attention cueing: performance enhancement from voluntary and involuntary attention. Pack W; Klein SA; Carney T Vision Res; 2014 Dec; 105():204-12. PubMed ID: 25159288 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Orienting of spatial attention in Huntington's Disease. Couette M; Bachoud-Levi AC; Brugieres P; Sieroff E; Bartolomeo P Neuropsychologia; 2008 Apr; 46(5):1391-400. PubMed ID: 18242648 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Neural correlates of spatial and non-spatial inhibition of return (IOR) in attentional orienting. Zhou X; Chen Q Neuropsychologia; 2008 Sep; 46(11):2766-75. PubMed ID: 18597795 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Distinct neural correlates for resolving stroop conflict at inhibited and noninhibited locations in inhibition of return. Chen Q; Wei P; Zhou X J Cogn Neurosci; 2006 Nov; 18(11):1937-46. PubMed ID: 17069483 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Movement versus focusing of visual attention. Shepherd M; Müller HJ Percept Psychophys; 1989 Aug; 46(2):146-54. PubMed ID: 2762102 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Rethinking human visual attention: spatial cueing effects and optimality of decisions by honeybees, monkeys and humans. Eckstein MP; Mack SC; Liston DB; Bogush L; Menzel R; Krauzlis RJ Vision Res; 2013 Jun; 85():5-19. PubMed ID: 23298793 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Uncued and cued dynamics measured by response classification. Shimozaki SS J Vis; 2010 Jul; 10(8):10. PubMed ID: 20884585 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Reward makes the rhythmic sampling of spatial attention emerge earlier. Su Z; Wang L; Kang G; Zhou X Atten Percept Psychophys; 2021 May; 83(4):1522-1537. PubMed ID: 33442826 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Spatial attention and cuing to global and local levels of hierarchical structure. Robertson LC; Egly R; Lamb MR; Kerth L J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1993 Jun; 19(3):471-87. PubMed ID: 8331311 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Sensory and decisional components of endogenous attention are dissociable. Banerjee S; Grover S; Ganesh S; Sridharan D J Neurophysiol; 2019 Oct; 122(4):1538-1554. PubMed ID: 31268805 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Implicit learning of spatiotemporal contingencies in spatial cueing. Rieth CA; Huber DE J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2013 Aug; 39(4):1165-80. PubMed ID: 23181686 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The role of temporal and spatial factors in the covert orienting of visual attention tasks. McAuliffe J; Pratt J Psychol Res; 2005 Mar; 69(4):285-91. PubMed ID: 15235912 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Configural and contextual prioritization in object-based attention. Shomstein S; Yantis S Psychon Bull Rev; 2004 Apr; 11(2):247-53. PubMed ID: 15260189 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The impact of probabilistic feature cueing depends on the level of cue abstraction. Dombert PL; Fink GR; Vossel S Exp Brain Res; 2016 Mar; 234(3):685-94. PubMed ID: 26586268 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]