These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

163 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 80696)

  • 1. Cervical cancer in younger women.
    Andrews FJ; Linehan JJ; Melcher DH
    Lancet; 1978 Oct; 2(8093):776-8. PubMed ID: 80696
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Effect of regular 3-yearly screening on the incidence of cervical smears: the Leiden experience.
    Boon ME; de Graaff Guilloud JC; Rietveld WJ; Wijsman-Grootendorst A
    Cytopathology; 1990; 1(4):201-10. PubMed ID: 2101670
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Prevalence of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia in sexually active teenagers and young adults. Results of data analysis of mass Papanicolaou screening of 796,337 women in the United States in 1981.
    Sadeghi SB; Hsieh EW; Gunn SW
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1984 Mar; 148(6):726-9. PubMed ID: 6702940
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A comprehensive program for cervical cancer detection and management.
    Benedet JL; Anderson GH; Matisic JP
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1992 Apr; 166(4):1254-9. PubMed ID: 1566781
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A longitudinal Swedish study on screening for squamous cell carcinoma and adenocarcinoma: evidence of effectiveness and overtreatment.
    Gunnell AS; Ylitalo N; Sandin S; Sparén P; Adami HO; Ripatti S
    Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 2007 Dec; 16(12):2641-8. PubMed ID: 18086769
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Cervical cytology screening history of women diagnosed with adenocarcinoma in situ of the cervix: a case-control study.
    Mitchell H; Hocking J; Saville M
    Acta Cytol; 2004; 48(5):595-600. PubMed ID: 15471249
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Results of the Leiden mass screening for cervix uteri carcinoma; the 'young' (24-34 years) versus the 'old' (35-54 years) group of women].
    Boon ME; de Graaff Guilloud-Gentenaar JC; Beck S
    Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 1990 Aug; 134(32):1545-9. PubMed ID: 2392176
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Recent negative cytology prior to histologically confirmed carcinoma in situ of the cervix.
    Mitchell H; Higgins V
    Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol; 1994 May; 34(2):178-81. PubMed ID: 7980308
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Intraepithelial carcinoma of the cervix uteri in women aged under 35 years.
    Davies SW; Kelly RM
    Br Med J; 1971 Nov; 4(5786):525-6. PubMed ID: 5126956
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Cervical cancers diagnosed after negative results on cervical cytology: perspective in the 1980s.
    Mitchell H; Medley G; Giles G
    BMJ; 1990 Jun; 300(6740):1622-6. PubMed ID: 2372641
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. 1991 cervical screening recommendations: a working group report.
    Paul C; Bagshaw S; Bonita R; Durham G; Fitzgerald NW; Jones RW; Marshall B; McAvoy BR
    N Z Med J; 1991 Jul; 104(915):291-5. PubMed ID: 1906587
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Quality assurance in cervical cancer screening: the Icelandic experience 1964-1993.
    Sigurdsson K
    Eur J Cancer; 1995; 31A(5):728-34. PubMed ID: 7640046
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Population-based prevalence of abnormal cervical cytology findings and local risk factors in Ibadan, Nigeria: implications for cervical cancer control programs and human papilloma virus immunization.
    Thomas JO; Ojemakinde KO; Ajayi IO; Omigbodun AO; Fawole OI; Oladepo O
    Acta Cytol; 2012; 56(3):251-8. PubMed ID: 22555526
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Effectiveness of cervical screening after age 60 years according to screening history: Nationwide cohort study in Sweden.
    Wang J; Andrae B; Sundström K; Ploner A; Ström P; Elfström KM; Dillner J; Sparén P
    PLoS Med; 2017 Oct; 14(10):e1002414. PubMed ID: 29065127
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Investigation of possible changes in the detection of cervical carcinoma in patients of Dutch general practitioners.
    Boon ME; Rietveld WJ; Kirk RS
    Tumori; 1982 Aug; 68(4):299-305. PubMed ID: 7147355
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Results from a cervical cancer screening programme in Manitoba, Canada.
    Choi NW; Nelson NA
    IARC Sci Publ; 1986; (76):61-7. PubMed ID: 3570416
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Epidemiology of human papillomavirus infection and cervical cancer and future perspectives in Hong Kong, Singapore and Taiwan.
    Tay SK; Ngan HY; Chu TY; Cheung AN; Tay EH
    Vaccine; 2008 Aug; 26 Suppl 12():M60-70. PubMed ID: 18945415
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Adolescents with abnormal cervical cytology.
    Schydlower M; Greeenberg H; Patterson PH
    Clin Pediatr (Phila); 1981 Nov; 20(11):723-6. PubMed ID: 7297012
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Letter: Screening for cervical cancer.
    Lancet; 1974 Jun; 1(7868):1221. PubMed ID: 4134347
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Cervical cancer screening. Past success and future challenge.
    Dewar MA; Hall K; Perchalski J
    Prim Care; 1992 Sep; 19(3):589-606. PubMed ID: 1410065
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.