These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

101 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8070256)

  • 1. Knowledge-based cephalometric analysis: a comparison with clinicians using interactive computer methods.
    Davis DN; Forsyth D
    Comput Biomed Res; 1994 Jun; 27(3):210-28. PubMed ID: 8070256
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A blackboard architecture for automating cephalometric analysis.
    Davis DN; Taylor CJ
    Med Inform (Lond); 1991; 16(2):137-49. PubMed ID: 1921559
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Ceph-X: development and evaluation of 2D cephalometric system.
    Mosleh MA; Baba MS; Malek S; Almaktari RA
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2016 Dec; 17(Suppl 19):499. PubMed ID: 28155649
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Automatic landmarking of cephalograms.
    Parthasarathy S; Nugent ST; Gregson PG; Fay DF
    Comput Biomed Res; 1989 Jun; 22(3):248-69. PubMed ID: 2721174
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparison of cephalometric analysis using a non-radiographic sonic digitizer (DigiGraph Workstation) with conventional radiography.
    Tsang KH; Cooke MS
    Eur J Orthod; 1999 Feb; 21(1):1-13. PubMed ID: 10191573
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Landmarking of cephalograms using a microcomputer system.
    Tong W; Nugent ST; Gregson PH; Jensen GM; Fay DF
    Comput Biomed Res; 1990 Aug; 23(4):358-79. PubMed ID: 2394093
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Reliability of computer-generated cephalometrics.
    Nimkarn Y; Miles PG
    Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg; 1995; 10(1):43-52. PubMed ID: 9081992
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The effects of differences in landmark identification on the cephalometric measurements in traditional versus digitized cephalometry.
    Chen YJ; Chen SK; Yao JC; Chang HF
    Angle Orthod; 2004 Apr; 74(2):155-61. PubMed ID: 15132440
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Automated 2-D cephalometric analysis on X-ray images by a model-based approach.
    Yue W; Yin D; Li C; Wang G; Xu T
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2006 Aug; 53(8):1615-23. PubMed ID: 16916096
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparison of conventional and cone beam CT synthesized cephalograms.
    Kumar V; Ludlow JB; Mol A; Cevidanes L
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2007 Jul; 36(5):263-9. PubMed ID: 17586852
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparison of the reliability of craniofacial anatomic landmarks based on cephalometric radiographs and three-dimensional CT scans.
    Kragskov J; Bosch C; Gyldensted C; Sindet-Pedersen S
    Cleft Palate Craniofac J; 1997 Mar; 34(2):111-6. PubMed ID: 9138504
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Computer-assisted location of reference points in three dimensions for radiographic cephalometry.
    Brown T; Abbott AH
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1989 Jun; 95(6):490-8. PubMed ID: 2658545
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Accuracy of cephalometric landmarks on monitor-displayed radiographs with and without image emboss enhancement.
    Leonardi RM; Giordano D; Maiorana F; Greco M
    Eur J Orthod; 2010 Jun; 32(3):242-7. PubMed ID: 20022892
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Automatic localization of three-dimensional cephalometric landmarks on CBCT images by extracting symmetry features of the skull.
    Neelapu BC; Kharbanda OP; Sardana V; Gupta A; Vasamsetti S; Balachandran R; Sardana HK
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2018 Feb; 47(2):20170054. PubMed ID: 28845693
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Accuracy of linear measurements from imaging plate and lateral cephalometric images derived from cone-beam computed tomography.
    Moshiri M; Scarfe WC; Hilgers ML; Scheetz JP; Silveira AM; Farman AG
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2007 Oct; 132(4):550-60. PubMed ID: 17920510
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Personal Computer-Based Cephalometric Landmark Detection With Deep Learning, Using Cephalograms on the Internet.
    Nishimoto S; Sotsuka Y; Kawai K; Ishise H; Kakibuchi M
    J Craniofac Surg; 2019 Jan; 30(1):91-95. PubMed ID: 30439733
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Computerized digital enhancement in craniofacial cephalometric radiography.
    Eppley BL; Sadove AM
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 1991 Oct; 49(10):1038-43. PubMed ID: 1890516
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Validity and reproducibility of cephalometric measurements obtained from digital photographs of analogue headfilms.
    Grybauskas S; Balciuniene I; Vetra J
    Stomatologija; 2007; 9(4):114-20. PubMed ID: 18303276
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Two-dimensional cephalometry and computerized orthognathic surgical treatment planning.
    Kusnoto B
    Clin Plast Surg; 2007 Jul; 34(3):417-26. PubMed ID: 17692701
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. An evaluation of the reproducibility of landmark identification using scanned cephalometric images.
    Turner PJ; Weerakone S
    J Orthod; 2001 Sep; 28(3):221-9. PubMed ID: 11504900
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.