These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

159 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8070459)

  • 61. Evaluation of the new VITEK 2 card for identification of clinically relevant gram-negative rods.
    Funke G; Funke-Kissling P
    J Clin Microbiol; 2004 Sep; 42(9):4067-71. PubMed ID: 15364991
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 62. Identification of clinical isolates of non-Enterobacteriaceae gram-negative rods by computer-assisted gas-liquid chromatography.
    Kellogg JA; Bankert DA; Brenneman TM; Grove MA; Wetzel SL; Young KS
    J Clin Microbiol; 1996 Apr; 34(4):1003-6. PubMed ID: 8815070
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 63. [Comparative evaluation of commercial test systems for the identification of gram-negative bacteria].
    Zubkov MN; Sutormina TM
    Antibiot Khimioter; 1988 May; 33(5):346-51. PubMed ID: 3415390
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 64. Evaluation of the BD Phoenix Automated Microbiology System for identification and antimicrobial susceptibility testing of common clinical isolates.
    Liu ZK; Ling TK; Cheng AF
    Med Princ Pract; 2005; 14(4):250-4. PubMed ID: 15961935
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 65. [Utility of pyrrolidonyl-arylamidase detection for typing Enterobacteriaceae and non-fermenting Gram-negative bacteria].
    Nicola F; Centorbi H; Bantar C; Smayevsky J; Bianchini H
    Rev Argent Microbiol; 1995; 27(4):204-9. PubMed ID: 8850133
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 66. [Evaluation of a new semi-automatic method of identifying enterobacteriaceae, M.I.S.-Enterobacteriaceae].
    Scheftel JM; Barth JG; Vincent M
    Ann Biol Clin (Paris); 1989; 47(4):207-12. PubMed ID: 2665580
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 67. Use of the Autobac IDX system for rapid identification of Enterobacteriaceae and nonfermentative gram-negative bacilli.
    Costigan WJ; Hollick GE
    J Clin Microbiol; 1984 Feb; 19(2):301-2. PubMed ID: 6365967
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 68. A cost-effective method for the presumptive identification of Enterobacteriaceae for diagnostic microbiology laboratories.
    Ng LS; Tan TY; Yeow SC
    Pathology; 2010 Apr; 42(3):280-3. PubMed ID: 20350223
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 69. Cobas-IDA system for identification of Enterobacteriaceae within four hours.
    Isenrich H; Wüst J
    Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis; 1988 Apr; 7(2):199-201. PubMed ID: 3134215
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 70. Same day identification of gram-negative rods with the Quantum II Microbiology System.
    Von Graevenitz A; Kappeler-Stefanow P; Zollinger-Iten J
    Microbiologica; 1986 Jan; 9(1):101-4. PubMed ID: 3512962
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 71. Evaluation of three molecular typing techniques for nonfermentative Gram-negative bacilli.
    Silbert S; Pfaller MA; Hollis RJ; Barth AL; Sader HS
    Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol; 2004 Oct; 25(10):847-51. PubMed ID: 15518027
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 72. [30 years' experience with isolation media in the diagnosis of gram-negative rod bacteria].
    Hausner O; Hausnerová S
    Cesk Epidemiol Mikrobiol Imunol; 1984 Jan; 33(1):1-8. PubMed ID: 6230161
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 73. [Evaluation of the ROBOBACT system for automatic processing of stool cultures].
    Sánchez-Sánchez MA; De Rafael L; Baquero F; Cantón R
    Enferm Infecc Microbiol Clin; 2003 Oct; 21(8):463. PubMed ID: 14525712
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 74. Ability of the MicroScan rapid gram-negative ID type 3 panel to identify nonenteric glucose-fermenting and nonfermenting gram-negative bacilli.
    O'Hara CM; Miller JM
    J Clin Microbiol; 2002 Oct; 40(10):3750-2. PubMed ID: 12354875
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 75. Comparison of the autoSCAN-W/A and Vitek Automicrobic systems for identification and susceptibility testing of bacteria.
    Visser MR; Bogaards L; Rozenberg-Arska M; Verhoef J
    Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis; 1992 Nov; 11(11):979-84. PubMed ID: 1295766
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 76. Evaluation of Gram-stain screen and Micro-ID methods for direct identification of Enterobacteriaceae from urines.
    Appelbaum PC; Olmstead CC
    Med Microbiol Immunol; 1982; 170(3):173-84. PubMed ID: 7043229
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 77. [The NEFERM-Test for identification of psychrotrophic bacteria in food].
    Urbanová E; Pácová Z
    Vet Med (Praha); 1995 May; 40(5):151-5. PubMed ID: 7793017
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 78. Evaluation of Biolog system for identification of some gram-negative bacteria of clinical importance.
    Holmes B; Costas M; Ganner M; On SL; Stevens M
    J Clin Microbiol; 1994 Aug; 32(8):1970-5. PubMed ID: 7989551
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 79. [Performance of MALDI-TOF MS for the identification of gram-negative bacteria grown on eosin methylene blue (EMB) agar: A simple method for improving the effectiveness of identification].
    Yakupoğulları Y; Otlu B; Çelik B; Gözükara Bağ HG
    Mikrobiyol Bul; 2019 Jan; 53(1):1-11. PubMed ID: 30683034
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 80. Rapid identification of gram-negative bacilli from blood cultures.
    Stevens M; Parish GT
    J Med Microbiol; 1986 May; 21(3):215-8. PubMed ID: 3517338
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.