These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
198 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8071037)
1. Comparison of iopromide with iohexol and iopamidol in coronary arteriography and left ventriculography. Bergelson B; Bettmann MA; Wexler L; Wilson R; Dyet J Invest Radiol; 1994 May; 29 Suppl 1():S107-11; discussion S118-9. PubMed ID: 8071037 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A double-blind study of iopromide 300 for peripheral arteriography. Results of a multi-institutional comparison of iopromide with iohexol and iopamidol. Druy EM; Bettmann MA; Jeans W Invest Radiol; 1994 May; 29 Suppl 1():S102-5; discussion S106. PubMed ID: 8071036 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A comparison of iopromide with iopamidol and iohexol for contrast-enhanced computed tomography. Goldberg SN; Abrahams J; Drayer BP; Golding S; Bernardino M; Brunetti J Invest Radiol; 1994 May; 29 Suppl 1():S76-83; discussion S93. PubMed ID: 8071050 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Double-blind study of the safety, tolerance, and diagnostic efficacy of iopromide as compared with iopamidol and iohexol in patients requiring aortography and visceral angiography. Faykus MH; Cope C; Athanasoulis C; Druy EM; Hedgcock M; Miller FJ; Bron K Invest Radiol; 1994 May; 29 Suppl 1():S98-101; discussion S106. PubMed ID: 8071053 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Safety and efficacy of iopromide in cerebral arteriography. Haughton VM; Papke RA; Hyland D; Drayer BP; Osborn AG; Maravilla K; Hilal SK Invest Radiol; 1994 May; 29 Suppl 1():S94-7. PubMed ID: 8071052 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of iopromide and iopamidol in left ventricular angiography and in coronary angiography. Dyet JF; Carter EC; Hartley WC Br J Radiol; 1990 Sep; 63(753):700-5. PubMed ID: 2205329 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Less iodine injected for the same diagnostic performances: comparison of two low-osmolar contrast agents (iobitridol 350 and iopamidol 370) in coronary angiography and ventriculography: a randomized double-blind clinical study. Velázquez MT; Albarrán A; Hernández F; García Tejada J; Zueco J; Andreu J; De la Torre JM; Figueroa A; Sainz F; Tascón J Acta Cardiol; 2010 Aug; 65(4):387-94. PubMed ID: 20821930 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Double-blind study of a new nonionic contrast agent for digital subtraction arteriography. Weiss JP; McLean GK; Modic MT; Rees CR; Higashida RT Invest Radiol; 1994 May; 29 Suppl 1():S84-92. PubMed ID: 8071051 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [Tolerability of nonionic contrast media--results of a multicenter double blind study]. Schmiedel E Aktuelle Radiol; 1992 May; 2(3):148-52. PubMed ID: 1610929 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Efficacy and safety of iopromide for excretory urography. Newhouse JH; Landman J; Lang E; Amis ES; Goldman S; Khazan R; Leder R; Hedgcock M Invest Radiol; 1994 May; 29 Suppl 1():S68-73. PubMed ID: 8071049 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Nonionic low-osmolar contrast media have no impact on major adverse cardiac events in patients undergoing coronary stenting with appropriate antiplatelet therapy. Danzi GB; Capuano C; Sesana M; Predolini S; Baglini R Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2003 Dec; 60(4):477-82. PubMed ID: 14624424 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Adverse reactions of low osmolar non-ionic and ionic contrast media when used together or separately during percutaneous coronary intervention. Juergens CP; Khaing AM; McIntyre GJ; Leung DY; Lo ST; Fernandes C; Hopkins AP Heart Lung Circ; 2005 Sep; 14(3):172-7. PubMed ID: 16352273 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Clinical tolerance and diagnostic efficacy of iobitridol 300 in lower limb angiography. Stockx L; Wilms G; Baert AL; Terrier F Acta Radiol Suppl; 1996; 400():72-4. PubMed ID: 8619357 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [Early hemodynamic cardiovascular reactions to nonionic low-osmolar contrast media in coronary angiography]. Wink K Rontgenblatter; 1988 Sep; 41(9):384-8. PubMed ID: 3175478 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Iomeprol: current and future profile of a radiocontrast agent. Katayama H; Spinazzi A; Fouillet X; Kirchin MA; Taroni P; Davies A Invest Radiol; 2001 Feb; 36(2):87-96. PubMed ID: 11224756 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [Comparative study of iohexol and iopamidol as cardioangiographic contrast media]. Esplugas E; Jara F; Sala J; Cequier A Rev Esp Cardiol; 1990 Feb; 43(2):84-6. PubMed ID: 2326538 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A double-blind study comparing the efficiency, tolerance and renal effects of iopromide and iopamidol. Kennedy C; Rickards D; Lee S; Sharp MB; Dawson P Br J Radiol; 1988 Apr; 61(724):288-93. PubMed ID: 3285943 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Left ventricular diastolic impairment during coronary arteriography with a non-ionic contrast medium. Baglini R; Sesana M; Capuano C; Rosella MG; Sardeo C; Danzi GB Minerva Cardioangiol; 2004 Aug; 52(4):323-8. PubMed ID: 15284681 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [Are nonionic contrast media identical in their tolerability? Results of a double-blind randomized multicenter study with iomeprol and iopromide]. Schmiedel E Aktuelle Radiol; 1997 Jul; 7(4):183-8. PubMed ID: 9340014 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A randomised, double-blind trial of iomeprol and iopromide in intravenous excretory urography. Harding JR; Bertazzoli M; Spinazzi A Eur J Radiol; 1994 May; 18 Suppl 1():S93-6. PubMed ID: 8020526 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]