These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

157 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8071051)

  • 1. Double-blind study of a new nonionic contrast agent for digital subtraction arteriography.
    Weiss JP; McLean GK; Modic MT; Rees CR; Higashida RT
    Invest Radiol; 1994 May; 29 Suppl 1():S84-92. PubMed ID: 8071051
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A comparison of iopromide with iopamidol and iohexol for contrast-enhanced computed tomography.
    Goldberg SN; Abrahams J; Drayer BP; Golding S; Bernardino M; Brunetti J
    Invest Radiol; 1994 May; 29 Suppl 1():S76-83; discussion S93. PubMed ID: 8071050
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A double-blind study of iopromide 300 for peripheral arteriography. Results of a multi-institutional comparison of iopromide with iohexol and iopamidol.
    Druy EM; Bettmann MA; Jeans W
    Invest Radiol; 1994 May; 29 Suppl 1():S102-5; discussion S106. PubMed ID: 8071036
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparison of iopromide with iohexol and iopamidol in coronary arteriography and left ventriculography.
    Bergelson B; Bettmann MA; Wexler L; Wilson R; Dyet J
    Invest Radiol; 1994 May; 29 Suppl 1():S107-11; discussion S118-9. PubMed ID: 8071037
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Double-blind study of the safety, tolerance, and diagnostic efficacy of iopromide as compared with iopamidol and iohexol in patients requiring aortography and visceral angiography.
    Faykus MH; Cope C; Athanasoulis C; Druy EM; Hedgcock M; Miller FJ; Bron K
    Invest Radiol; 1994 May; 29 Suppl 1():S98-101; discussion S106. PubMed ID: 8071053
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Safety and efficacy of iopromide in cerebral arteriography.
    Haughton VM; Papke RA; Hyland D; Drayer BP; Osborn AG; Maravilla K; Hilal SK
    Invest Radiol; 1994 May; 29 Suppl 1():S94-7. PubMed ID: 8071052
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Efficacy and safety of iopromide for excretory urography.
    Newhouse JH; Landman J; Lang E; Amis ES; Goldman S; Khazan R; Leder R; Hedgcock M
    Invest Radiol; 1994 May; 29 Suppl 1():S68-73. PubMed ID: 8071049
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Analysis of renal and hepatic impairment by ionic and nonionic contrast media.
    Langer M; Langer R; Felix R; Speck U; Behrends B; Mützel W
    Invest Radiol; 1990 Sep; 25 Suppl 1():S125-6. PubMed ID: 2283230
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Clinical experience with ioversol for angiography.
    Bettmann MA
    Invest Radiol; 1989 Jun; 24 Suppl 1():S61-6. PubMed ID: 2687199
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Peripheral arteriography with a new nonionic agent: comparison of iomeprol with iopamidol.
    Ugolotti U; Larini P; Marcato C; Cusmano F; Puccianti F
    Eur J Radiol; 1994 May; 18 Suppl 1():S77-82. PubMed ID: 8020523
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Pharmacochemical profile of iopromide.
    Muetzel W; Speck U
    AJNR Am J Neuroradiol; 1983; 4(3):350-2. PubMed ID: 6410742
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Tolerability of nonionic contrast media--results of a multicenter double blind study].
    Schmiedel E
    Aktuelle Radiol; 1992 May; 2(3):148-52. PubMed ID: 1610929
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Undesirable side effects of contrast media during i.v. DSA--a comparison of 2 nonionic contrast media].
    Gross-Fengels W; Neufang KF; Siebert C; Lanfermann H; Steinbrich W
    Rontgenblatter; 1990 Apr; 43(4):144-9. PubMed ID: 2187230
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Initial experience with a nonionic, dimeric contrast medium (iotrolan) in direct and indirect arteriography: a randomized, intraindividual double-blind study in 60 patients.
    Hagen B; Wenzel-Hora BI
    Fortschr Geb Rontgenstrahlen Nuklearmed Erganzungsbd; 1989; 128():54-60. PubMed ID: 2568808
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Iodixanol in femoral arteriography (phase III): a comparative double-blind parallel trial between iodixanol and iopromide.
    Pugh ND; Sissons GR; Ruttley MS; Berg KJ; Nossen JO; Eide H
    Clin Radiol; 1993 Feb; 47(2):96-9. PubMed ID: 8435972
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Effects of non-ionic iodinated contrast media on patient heart rate and pressures during intra-cardiac or intra-arterial injection.
    Schmid I; Didier D; Pfammatter T; Garachemani A; Fleisch M; Kirchin MA; Meier B
    Int J Cardiol; 2007 Jun; 118(3):389-96. PubMed ID: 17376548
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Clinical experience with iobitridol 250-300 in digital subtraction angiography. Double-blind randomized studies vs. iopromide and iohexol.
    Bouard JC; Lyonnet D; Illes JP; Bouard-Monnier C; Rouviere O; Pangaud C
    Acta Radiol Suppl; 1996; 400():85-8. PubMed ID: 8619361
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A double-blind study comparing the safety, tolerability, and efficacy of ioversol 320 and iopamidol-300 in cerebral angiography.
    Ringel K; Kuehn J
    Invest Radiol; 1989 Jun; 24 Suppl 1():S48-51. PubMed ID: 2687196
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Injection-associated pain in femoral arteriography: a European multicenter study comparing safety, tolerability, and efficacy of iodixanol and iopromide.
    Justesen P; Downes M; Grynne BH; Lang H; Rasch W; Seim E
    Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol; 1997; 20(4):251-6. PubMed ID: 9211770
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Iomeprol: current and future profile of a radiocontrast agent.
    Katayama H; Spinazzi A; Fouillet X; Kirchin MA; Taroni P; Davies A
    Invest Radiol; 2001 Feb; 36(2):87-96. PubMed ID: 11224756
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.