These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

94 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8071165)

  • 1. Estimating marbling score in live cattle from ultrasound images using pattern recognition and neural network procedures.
    Brethour JR
    J Anim Sci; 1994 Jun; 72(6):1425-32. PubMed ID: 8071165
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Using serial ultrasound measures to generate models of marbling and backfat thickness changes in feedlot cattle.
    Brethour JR
    J Anim Sci; 2000 Aug; 78(8):2055-61. PubMed ID: 10947087
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Estimation of beef marbling in the Longissimus muscle with computer image analysis of ultrasonic pictures of the Iliocostalis muscle area.
    Nade T; Kataoka Y; Hoshi K; Maeda I; Saito K
    Anim Sci J; 2014 Mar; 85(3):247-53. PubMed ID: 24261715
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Relationship of ultrasound speckle to marbling score in cattle.
    Brethour JR
    J Anim Sci; 1990 Sep; 68(9):2603-13. PubMed ID: 2211388
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Genetic parameters for carcass traits and their live animal indicators in Simmental cattle.
    Crews DH; Pollak EJ; Weaber RL; Quaas RL; Lipsey RJ
    J Anim Sci; 2003 Jun; 81(6):1427-33. PubMed ID: 12817489
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Using receiver operating characteristic analysis to evaluate the accuracy in predicting future quality grade from ultrasound marbling estimates on beef calves.
    Brethour JR
    J Anim Sci; 2000 Sep; 78(9):2263-8. PubMed ID: 10985397
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparison of four real-time ultrasound systems that predict intramuscular fat in beef cattle.
    Herring WO; Kriese LA; Bertrand JK; Crouch J
    J Anim Sci; 1998 Feb; 76(2):364-70. PubMed ID: 9498340
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Ultrasound image texture analysis for characterizing intramuscular fat content of live beef cattle.
    Kim N; Amin V; Wilson D; Rouse G; Udpa S
    Ultrason Imaging; 1998 Jul; 20(3):191-205. PubMed ID: 9921619
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Estimates of genetic parameters for live animal ultrasound, actual carcass data, and growth traits in beef cattle.
    Arnold JW; Bertrand JK; Benyshek LL; Ludwig C
    J Anim Sci; 1991 Mar; 69(3):985-92. PubMed ID: 2061268
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Predicting percentage of intramuscular fat using two types of real-time ultrasound equipment.
    Hassen A; Wilson DE; Amin VR; Rouse GH; Hays CL
    J Anim Sci; 2001 Jan; 79(1):11-8. PubMed ID: 11204690
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Evaluation of Simmental carcass EPD estimated using live and carcass data.
    Crews DH; Pollak EJ; Quaas RL
    J Anim Sci; 2004 Mar; 82(3):661-7. PubMed ID: 15032422
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Evaluation of ultrasound for prediction of carcass fat thickness and longissimus muscle area in feedlot steers.
    Smith MT; Oltjen JW; Dolezal HG; Gill DR; Behrens BD
    J Anim Sci; 1992 Jan; 70(1):29-37. PubMed ID: 1582915
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Prediction of retail product and trimmable fat yields from the four primal cuts in beef cattle using ultrasound or carcass data.
    Tait RG; Wilson DE; Rouse GH
    J Anim Sci; 2005 Jun; 83(6):1353-60. PubMed ID: 15890812
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Ultrasonic prediction of carcass merit in beef cattle: evaluation of technician effects on ultrasonic estimates of carcass fat thickness and longissimus muscle area.
    Perkins TL; Green RD; Hamlin KE; Shepard HH; Miller MF
    J Anim Sci; 1992 Sep; 70(9):2758-65. PubMed ID: 1399892
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Use of ultrasound to predict body composition changes in steers at 100 and 65 days before slaughter.
    Wall PB; Rouse GH; Wilson DE; Tait RG; Busby WD
    J Anim Sci; 2004 Jun; 82(6):1621-9. PubMed ID: 15216987
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Genetic and phenotypic relationships of serum leptin concentration with performance, efficiency of gain, and carcass merit of feedlot cattle.
    Nkrumah JD; Keisler DH; Crews DH; Basarab JA; Wang Z; Li C; Price MA; Okine EK; Moore SS
    J Anim Sci; 2007 Sep; 85(9):2147-55. PubMed ID: 17468416
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Validation of real-time ultrasound technology for predicting fat thicknesses, longissimus muscle areas, and composition of Brangus bulls from 4 months to 2 years of age.
    Waldner DN; Dikeman ME; Schalles RR; Olson WG; Houghton PL; Unruh JA; Corah LR
    J Anim Sci; 1992 Oct; 70(10):3044-54. PubMed ID: 1429280
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Evaluation of ultrasonic estimates of carcass fat thickness and longissimus muscle area in beef cattle.
    Perkins TL; Green RD; Hamlin KE
    J Anim Sci; 1992 Apr; 70(4):1002-10. PubMed ID: 1582927
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The relationship between ultrasound measurements and carcass fat thickness and longissimus muscle area in beef cattle.
    Greiner SP; Rouse GH; Wilson DE; Cundiff LV; Wheeler TL
    J Anim Sci; 2003 Mar; 81(3):676-82. PubMed ID: 12661648
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparison of real-time ultrasound and other live measures to carcass measures as predictors of beef cow energy stores.
    Bullock KD; Bertrand JK; Benyshek LL; Williams SE; Lust DG
    J Anim Sci; 1991 Oct; 69(10):3908-16. PubMed ID: 1778802
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.