These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
133 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8071174)
1. Predictors of beef tenderness among carcasses produced under commercial conditions. Jones BK; Tatum JD J Anim Sci; 1994 Jun; 72(6):1492-501. PubMed ID: 8071174 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The efficacy of adding a minimum adjusted fat thickness requirement to the USDA beef quality grading standards for select grade beef. Shackelford SD; Koohmaraie M; Wheeler TL J Anim Sci; 1994 Jun; 72(6):1502-7. PubMed ID: 8071175 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Effectiveness of USDA instrument-based marbling measurements for categorizing beef carcasses according to differences in longissimus muscle sensory attributes. Emerson MR; Woerner DR; Belk KE; Tatum JD J Anim Sci; 2013 Feb; 91(2):1024-34. PubMed ID: 23148250 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Effects of United States Department of Agriculture carcass maturity on sensory attributes of steaks produced by cattle representing two dental age classes. Semler ML; Woerner DR; Belk KE; Enns KJ; Tatum JD J Anim Sci; 2016 May; 94(5):2207-17. PubMed ID: 27285716 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Effects of USDA carcass maturity on sensory attributes of beef produced by grain-finished steers and heifers classified as less than 30 months old using dentition. Acheson RJ; Woerner DR; Tatum JD J Anim Sci; 2014 Apr; 92(4):1792-9. PubMed ID: 24663159 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Effect of days fed, carcass grade traits, and subcutaneous fat removal on postmortem muscle characteristics and beef palatability. May SG; Dolezal HG; Gill DR; Ray FK; Buchanan DS J Anim Sci; 1992 Feb; 70(2):444-53. PubMed ID: 1548207 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Evaluation of the Tendertec beef grading instrument to predict the tenderness of steaks from beef carcasses. Belk KE; George MH; Tatum JD; Hilton GG; Miller RK; Koohmaraie M; Reagan JO; Smith GC J Anim Sci; 2001 Mar; 79(3):688-97. PubMed ID: 11263829 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Characterization of biological types of cattle (Cycle VI): carcass, yield, and longissimus palatability traits. Wheeler TL; Cundiff LV; Shackelford SD; Koohmaraie M J Anim Sci; 2004 Apr; 82(4):1177-89. PubMed ID: 15080341 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Benchmarking carcass characteristics and muscles from commercially identified beef and dairy cull cow carcasses for Warner-Bratzler shear force and sensory attributes. Stelzleni AM; Patten LE; Johnson DD; Calkins CR; Gwartney BL J Anim Sci; 2007 Oct; 85(10):2631-8. PubMed ID: 17565055 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Online prediction of beef tenderness using a computer vision system equipped with a BeefCam module. Vote DJ; Belk KE; Tatum JD; Scanga JA; Smith GC J Anim Sci; 2003 Feb; 81(2):457-65. PubMed ID: 12643490 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Using objective measures of muscle color to predict beef longissimus tenderness. Wulf DM; O'Connor SF; Tatum JD; Smith GC J Anim Sci; 1997 Mar; 75(3):684-92. PubMed ID: 9078484 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Tenderness classification of beef: I. Evaluation of beef longissimus shear force at 1 or 2 days postmortem as a predictor of aged beef tenderness. Shackelford SD; Wheeler TL; Koohmaraie M J Anim Sci; 1997 Sep; 75(9):2417-22. PubMed ID: 9303460 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Growth implants reduced tenderness of steaks from steers and heifers with different genetic potentials for growth and marbling. Boles JA; Boss DL; Neary KI; Davis KC; Tess MW J Anim Sci; 2009 Jan; 87(1):269-74. PubMed ID: 18791138 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Slaughter plant location, USDA quality grade, external fat thickness, and aging time effects on sensory characteristics of beef loin strip steak. Miller MF; Kerth CR; Wise JW; Lansdell JL; Stowell JE; Ramsey CB J Anim Sci; 1997 Mar; 75(3):662-7. PubMed ID: 9078481 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Characterization of certified Angus beef steaks from the round, loin, and chuck. Nelson JL; Dolezal HG; Ray FK; Morgan JB J Anim Sci; 2004 May; 82(5):1437-44. PubMed ID: 15144084 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Technical note: validation of a model for online classification of US Select beef carcasses for longissimus tenderness using visible and near-infrared reflectance spectroscopy. Shackelford SD; Wheeler TL; Koohmaraie M J Anim Sci; 2012 Mar; 90(3):973-7. PubMed ID: 22064741 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Effect of phenotypic expression of Brahman breeding on marbling and tenderness traits. Sherbeck JA; Tatum JD; Field TG; Morgan JB; Smith GC J Anim Sci; 1996 Feb; 74(2):304-9. PubMed ID: 8690665 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Using the near-infrared system to sort various beef middle and end muscle cuts into tenderness categories. Price DM; Hilton GG; VanOverbeke DL; Morgan JB J Anim Sci; 2008 Feb; 86(2):413-8. PubMed ID: 17965325 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Mechanical probes can predict tenderness of cooked beef longissimus using uncooked measurements. Stephens JW; Unruh JA; Dikeman ME; Hunt MC; Lawrence TE; Loughin TM J Anim Sci; 2004 Jul; 82(7):2077-86. PubMed ID: 15309955 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Mechanical measures of uncooked beef longissimus muscle can predict sensory panel tenderness and Warner-Bratzler shear force of cooked steaks. Timm RR; Unruh JA; Dikeman ME; Hunt MC; Lawrence TE; Boyer JE; Marsden JL J Anim Sci; 2003 Jul; 81(7):1721-7. PubMed ID: 12854808 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]