These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

151 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8072355)

  • 1. Frequency selectivity in patients with acoustic neuroma.
    Papsin BC; Abel SM; Nedzelski JM
    Laryngoscope; 1994 Sep; 104(9):1092-8. PubMed ID: 8072355
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. High-level psychophysical tuning curves: simultaneous masking by pure tones and 100-Hz-wide noise bands.
    Nelson DA; Fortune TW
    J Speech Hear Res; 1991 Apr; 34(2):360-73. PubMed ID: 2046360
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Speech recognition in noise: estimating effects of compressive nonlinearities in the basilar-membrane response.
    Horwitz AR; Ahlstrom JB; Dubno JR
    Ear Hear; 2007 Sep; 28(5):682-93. PubMed ID: 17804982
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Estimates of basilar-membrane nonlinearity effects on masking of tones and speech.
    Dubno JR; Horwitz AR; Ahlstrom JB
    Ear Hear; 2007 Feb; 28(1):2-17. PubMed ID: 17204895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. High-level psychophysical tuning curves: forward masking in normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners.
    Nelson DA
    J Speech Hear Res; 1991 Dec; 34(6):1233-49. PubMed ID: 1787705
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Role of probe tone parameters in frequency selectivity for normal listeners.
    Abel SM; Cheskes MB; Giguere C
    J Otolaryngol; 1989 Aug; 18(5):205-9. PubMed ID: 2769832
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Frequency tuning curves derived from auditory steady state evoked potentials: a proof-of-concept study.
    Markessis E; Poncelet L; Colin C; Coppens A; Hoonhorst I; Kadhim H; Deltenre P
    Ear Hear; 2009 Feb; 30(1):43-53. PubMed ID: 19125026
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Effects of cochlear impairment and equivalent-threshold masking on psychoacoustic tuning curves.
    Florentine M
    Audiology; 1992; 31(5):241-53. PubMed ID: 1449429
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Identifying dead regions in the cochlea: psychophysical tuning curves and tone detection in threshold-equalizing noise.
    Summers V; Molis MR; Müsch H; Walden BE; Surr RK; Cord MT
    Ear Hear; 2003 Apr; 24(2):133-42. PubMed ID: 12677110
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Factors affecting psychophysical tuning curves for normally hearing subjects.
    Kluk K; Moore BC
    Hear Res; 2004 Aug; 194(1-2):118-34. PubMed ID: 15276683
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Temporal summation in hearing-impaired listeners.
    Papsin BC; Abel SM
    J Otolaryngol; 1988 Apr; 17(2):93-100. PubMed ID: 3385874
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Indices of hearing in patients with central auditory pathology. I. Detection and discrimination.
    Thompson ME; Abel SM
    Scand Audiol Suppl; 1992; 35():3-15. PubMed ID: 1439509
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Standard cochlear implantation of adults with residual low-frequency hearing: implications for combined electro-acoustic stimulation.
    Novak MA; Black JM; Koch DB
    Otol Neurotol; 2007 Aug; 28(5):609-14. PubMed ID: 17514064
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Tone burst auditory brain stem response latency estimates of cochlear travel time in Meniere's disease, cochlear hearing loss, and normal ears.
    Murray JG; Cohn ES; Harker LA; Gorga MP
    Am J Otol; 1998 Nov; 19(6):854-9. PubMed ID: 9831168
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Profile of hearing in patients with unilateral acoustic neuromas: the importance of the contralateral ear.
    Stipkovits EM; van Dijk JE; Graamans K
    Am J Otol; 1998 Nov; 19(6):834-9. PubMed ID: 9831164
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Cochlear compression in listeners with moderate sensorineural hearing loss.
    Lopez-Poveda EA; Plack CJ; Meddis R; Blanco JL
    Hear Res; 2005 Jul; 205(1-2):172-83. PubMed ID: 15953526
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The effects of speech presentation level on acceptance of noise in listeners with normal and impaired hearing.
    Freyaldenhoven MC; Plyler PN; Thelin JW; Hedrick MS
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2007 Aug; 50(4):878-85. PubMed ID: 17675593
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Role of transient-evoked otoacoustic emissions for hearing preservation in acoustic neuroma surgery.
    Filipo R; Delfini R; Fabiani M; Cordier A; Barbara M
    Am J Otol; 1997 Nov; 18(6):746-9. PubMed ID: 9391671
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Acoustic neuromas presenting with normal or symmetrical hearing: factors associated with diagnosis and outcome.
    Lustig LR; Rifkin S; Jackler RK; Pitts LH
    Am J Otol; 1998 Mar; 19(2):212-8. PubMed ID: 9520059
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Stability of hearing preservation following acoustic neuroma surgery.
    Tucci DL; Telian SA; Kileny PR; Hoff JT; Kemink JL
    Am J Otol; 1994 Mar; 15(2):183-8. PubMed ID: 8172299
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.