223 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8072567)
1. [Development of guidelines for medical procedures; relationship between goal, method and effect].
Kaasenbrood AJ; Klazinga NS
Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 1994 Jul; 138(31):1560-4. PubMed ID: 8072567
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. [Practice guidelines and accreditation: highlights from 50 years of quality management by the Dutch College of General Practitioners].
in 't Veld CJ; Grol RP
Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 2007 Dec; 151(52):2916-9. PubMed ID: 18257441
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. [Guidelines of the Dutch College of Family Practitioners].
Thomas S
Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 1993 Oct; 137(42):2135-8. PubMed ID: 8232660
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. German ambulatory care physicians' perspectives on clinical guidelines - a national survey.
Butzlaff M; Kempkens D; Schnee M; Dieterle WE; Böcken J; Rieger MA
BMC Fam Pract; 2006 Jul; 7():47. PubMed ID: 16857051
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Development, evaluation, and implementation of medical practice parameters.
Kelly JT; Toepp MC
Med Staff Couns; 1992; 6(4):45-9. PubMed ID: 10122128
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [Guideline development for general medicine: the problem of dichotomized algorithm development].
Niederstadt CJ; Doering TJ; Fischer GC
Z Arztl Fortbild Qualitatssich; 2001 Aug; 95(8):561-6. PubMed ID: 11575140
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [Valid information--current treatment].
Saarelma O
Duodecim; 1997; 113(14):1343-9. PubMed ID: 10622140
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. The implementation of guidelines in The Netherlands.
Timmermans AE; in 't Veld CJ
Z Arztl Fortbild Qualitatssich; 2001 Nov; 95(10):719-24. PubMed ID: 11778325
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [Quality of referrals from general practitioners to medical polyclinics].
Lønning KJ; Kongshavn T; Husebye E
Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen; 2009 Sep; 129(18):1868-9. PubMed ID: 19844279
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Decision making the explicit evidence-based way: comparing benefits, harms and costs.
McArthur J; Dickinson A
Nurs Prax N Z; 1999 Mar; 14(1):33-42. PubMed ID: 10481662
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Making decisions about cancer screening when the guidelines are unclear or conflicting.
Tudiver F; Brown JB; Medved W; Herbert C; Ritvo P; Guibert R; Haggerty J; Goel V; Smith P; O'Beirne M; Katz A; Moliner P; Ciampi A; Williams JI
J Fam Pract; 2001 Aug; 50(8):682-7. PubMed ID: 11509162
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [Why not standard practice guidelines in Japan?].
Nakajima T
Gan To Kagaku Ryoho; 1999 Apr; 26(5):597-601. PubMed ID: 10234288
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Analysis of overall level of evidence behind Infectious Diseases Society of America practice guidelines.
Lee DH; Vielemeyer O
Arch Intern Med; 2011 Jan; 171(1):18-22. PubMed ID: 21220656
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Migraine headache, evidence-based guidelines, and the AAFP. American Academy of Family Physicians.
Wall EM
Am Fam Physician; 2002 Dec; 66(11):2050. PubMed ID: 12484687
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. [Consensus development; a comparison between the United States and the Netherlands].
van Everdingen JJ; Casparie AF; de Roy van Zuydewijn HJ
Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 1985 Oct; 129(40):1935-8. PubMed ID: 4069254
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. [Importance and possibilities of general guidelines in family practice strategies--do we need 'basic guidelines' in general practice?].
Fischer GC; Beyer M; Gerlach FM; Rohde-Kampmann R
Z Arztl Fortbild Qualitatssich; 2001 Jul; 95(6):435-42. PubMed ID: 11503564
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Further concerns about the National Institute of Child Health and Human Development guidelines for interpretation of electronic fetal heart rate monitoring.
Bernardes J; Ayres-de-Campos D; Costa-Pereira A
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2001 Jun; 184(7):1587-8. PubMed ID: 11408896
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Generalists or specialists--who does it better?
Cram P; Ettinger WH
Physician Exec; 1998; 24(1):40-5. PubMed ID: 10180486
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The American College of Radiology Appropriateness Criteria: the users' perspective.
Jamal T; Gunderman RB
J Am Coll Radiol; 2008 Mar; 5(3):158-60. PubMed ID: 18312960
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Overcoming the challenges facing quality-improvement strategies for non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndromes.
Roe MT; Peterson ED; Ohman EM; Smith SC; Gibler WB
Am Fam Physician; 2004 Nov; 70(10):1868, 1874, 1876. PubMed ID: 15571056
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]