220 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8073315)
1. Metallic spinal artifacts in magnetic resonance imaging.
Vaccaro AR; Chesnut RM; Scuderi G; Healy JF; Massie JB; Garfin SR
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 1994 Jun; 19(11):1237-42. PubMed ID: 8073315
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A comparison of magnetic resonance and computed tomographic image quality after the implantation of tantalum and titanium spinal instrumentation.
Wang JC; Yu WD; Sandhu HS; Tam V; Delamarter RB
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 1998 Aug; 23(15):1684-8. PubMed ID: 9704376
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Metallic artifacts in magnetic resonance imaging of patients with spinal fusion. A comparison of implant materials and imaging sequences.
Rudisch A; Kremser C; Peer S; Kathrein A; Judmaier W; Daniaux H
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 1998 Mar; 23(6):692-9. PubMed ID: 9549791
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Minimizing artifacts caused by metallic implants at MR imaging: experimental and clinical studies.
Suh JS; Jeong EK; Shin KH; Cho JH; Na JB; Kim DH; Han CD
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1998 Nov; 171(5):1207-13. PubMed ID: 9798849
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Magnetic resonance imaging susceptibility artifacts in the cervical vertebrae and spinal cord related to monocortical screw-polymethylmethacrylate implants in canine cadavers.
Jones BG; Fosgate GT; Green EM; Habing AM; Hettlich BF
Am J Vet Res; 2017 Apr; 78(4):458-464. PubMed ID: 28346006
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Evaluation of MR issues for the latest standard brands of orthopedic metal implants: plates and screws.
Zou YF; Chu B; Wang CB; Hu ZY
Eur J Radiol; 2015 Mar; 84(3):450-457. PubMed ID: 25544555
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Aneurysm clip MR artifacts. Titanium versus stainless steel and influence of imaging parameters.
Burtscher IM; Owman T; Romner B; Ståhlberg F; Holtås S
Acta Radiol; 1998 Jan; 39(1):70-6. PubMed ID: 9498874
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Magnetic resonance imaging in cadaver dogs with metallic vertebral implants at 3 Tesla: evaluation of the WARP-turbo spin echo sequence.
Griffin JF; Archambault NS; Mankin JM; Wall CR; Thompson JA; Padua A; Purdy D; Kerwin SC
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2013 Nov; 38(24):E1548-53. PubMed ID: 23921320
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Optimizing imaging parameters for MR evaluation of the spine with titanium pedicle screws.
Petersilge CA; Lewin JS; Duerk JL; Yoo JU; Ghaneyem AJ
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1996 May; 166(5):1213-8. PubMed ID: 8615272
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A comparison of magnetic and radiographic imaging artifact after using three types of metal rods: stainless steel, titanium, and vitallium.
Knott PT; Mardjetko SM; Kim RH; Cotter TM; Dunn MM; Patel ST; Spencer MJ; Wilson AS; Tager DS
Spine J; 2010 Sep; 10(9):789-94. PubMed ID: 20619749
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Quantitative assessment of an MR technique for reducing metal artifact: application to spin-echo imaging in a phantom.
Lee MJ; Janzen DL; Munk PL; MacKay A; Xiang QS; McGowen A
Skeletal Radiol; 2001 Jul; 30(7):398-401. PubMed ID: 11499781
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Evaluation of the WARP-turbo spin echo sequence for 3 Tesla magnetic resonance imaging of stifle joints in dogs with stainless steel tibial plateau leveling osteotomy implants.
Simpler RE; Kerwin SC; Eichelberger BM; Wall CR; Thompson JA; Padua A; Purdy D; Griffin JF
Vet Radiol Ultrasound; 2014; 55(4):414-9. PubMed ID: 24438513
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. MR parameters for imaging titanium spinal instrumentation.
Wang JC; Sandhu HS; Yu WD; Minchew JT; Delamarter RB
J Spinal Disord; 1997 Feb; 10(1):27-32. PubMed ID: 9041493
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Postoperative magnetic resonance imaging artifact with cobalt-chromium versus titanium spinal instrumentation: presented at the 2013 Joint Spine Section Meeting. Clinical article.
Ahmad FU; Sidani C; Fourzali R; Wang MY
J Neurosurg Spine; 2013 Nov; 19(5):629-36. PubMed ID: 24053373
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The value of radiographic screening for metallic particles in the equine foot and size of related artifacts on low-field MRI.
Urraca del Junco CI; Shaw DJ; Weaver MP; Schwarz T
Vet Radiol Ultrasound; 2011; 52(6):634-9. PubMed ID: 21831245
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. SEMAC-VAT and MSVAT-SPACE sequence strategies for metal artifact reduction in 1.5T magnetic resonance imaging.
Ai T; Padua A; Goerner F; Nittka M; Gugala Z; Jadhav S; Trelles M; Johnson RF; Lindsey RW; Li X; Runge VM
Invest Radiol; 2012 May; 47(5):267-76. PubMed ID: 22266987
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A biomechanical evaluation of magnetic resonance imaging-compatible wire in cervical spine fixation.
Scuderi GJ; Greenberg SS; Cohen DS; Latta LL; Eismont FJ
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 1993 Oct; 18(14):1991-4. PubMed ID: 8272948
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Magnetic resonance imaging metallic artifact of commonly encountered surgical implants and foreign material.
Sutherland-Smith J; Tilley B
Vet Radiol Ultrasound; 2012; 53(3):312-7. PubMed ID: 22277053
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Material-Dependent Implant Artifact Reduction Using SEMAC-VAT and MAVRIC: A Prospective MRI Phantom Study.
Filli L; Jud L; Luechinger R; Nanz D; Andreisek G; Runge VM; Kozerke S; Farshad-Amacker NA
Invest Radiol; 2017 Jun; 52(6):381-387. PubMed ID: 28092272
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The radiographic and imaging characteristics of porous tantalum implants within the human cervical spine.
Levi AD; Choi WG; Keller PJ; Heiserman JE; Sonntag VK; Dickman CA
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 1998 Jun; 23(11):1245-50; discussion 1251. PubMed ID: 9636978
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
