These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

79 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8073923)

  • 1. [Endopyelotomy. A definitive alternative to pyeloplasty?].
    Amón Sesmero JH; Estebanez Zarranz J; Martínez-Sagarra JM
    Actas Urol Esp; 1994 May; 18 Suppl():351-8. PubMed ID: 8073923
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Minimally invasive treatment of ureteropelvic junction obstruction: long-term experience with an algorithm for laser endopyelotomy and laparoscopic retroperitoneal pyeloplasty.
    Rassweiler JJ; Subotic S; Feist-Schwenk M; Sugiono M; Schulze M; Teber D; Frede T
    J Urol; 2007 Mar; 177(3):1000-5. PubMed ID: 17296396
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Endopyeloplasty versus endopyelotomy versus laparoscopic pyeloplasty for primary ureteropelvic junction obstruction.
    Desai MM; Desai MR; Gill IS
    Urology; 2004 Jul; 64(1):16-21; discussion 21. PubMed ID: 15245924
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Is antegrade endopyelotomy really less invasive than open pyeloplasty?
    Dobry E; Usai P; Studer UE; Danuser H
    Urol Int; 2007; 79(2):152-6. PubMed ID: 17851286
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Laparoscopic pyeloplasty versus antegrade endopyelotomy: comparison in 100 patients and a new algorithm for the minimally invasive treatment of ureteropelvic junction obstruction.
    Ost MC; Kaye JD; Guttman MJ; Lee BR; Smith AD
    Urology; 2005 Nov; 66(5 Suppl):47-51. PubMed ID: 16194707
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparison of percutaneous endopyelotomy with open pyeloplasty for pediatric ureteropelvic junction obstruction.
    Schenkman EM; Tarry WF
    J Urol; 1998 Mar; 159(3):1013-5. PubMed ID: 9474220
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Percutaneous antegrade endopyelotomy: long-term results from one institution.
    Knudsen BE; Cook AJ; Watterson JD; Beiko DT; Nott L; Razvi H; Denstedt JD
    Urology; 2004 Feb; 63(2):230-4. PubMed ID: 14972459
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Laparoscopic pyeloplasty for secondary ureteropelvic junction obstruction.
    Sundaram CP; Grubb RL; Rehman J; Yan Y; Chen C; Landman J; McDougall EM; Clayman RV
    J Urol; 2003 Jun; 169(6):2037-40. PubMed ID: 12771713
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [100 percutaneous endopyelotomies. Technique, indications, results].
    Cuzin B; Abbar M; Dawahra M; Viguier JL; Martin X; Gelet A
    Prog Urol; 1992; 2(4):559-69. PubMed ID: 1302095
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Long-term outcome of secondary endopyelotomy after failed primary intervention for ureteropelvic junction obstruction.
    Park J; Kim WS; Hong B; Park T; Park HK
    Int J Urol; 2008 Jun; 15(6):490-4. PubMed ID: 18422578
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Percutaneous endopyelotomy in the treatment of ureteropelvic junction obstruction.
    Lojanapiwat B; Lertsupphakul B
    J Med Assoc Thai; 2004 Aug; 87(8):947-50. PubMed ID: 15471300
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Treatment of ureteropelvic junction stenosis with cold blade retrograde endopyelotomy].
    Devevey JM; Michel F; Randrianantenaina A; Cercueil JP
    Prog Urol; 1999 Apr; 9(2):244-55. PubMed ID: 10370948
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Retroperitoneoscopic pyeloplasty for ureteropelvic junction obstruction (UPJO): solving the technical difficulties.
    Bachmann A; Ruszat R; Forster T; Eberli D; Zimmermann M; Müller A; Gasser TC; Sulser T; Wyler S
    Eur Urol; 2006 Feb; 49(2):264-72. PubMed ID: 16439056
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Anterograde endopyelotomy].
    Surur DM; Iglesias Prieto JI; Mancebo Gómez JM; Massarra Halabi J; Pérez-Castro Ellendt E
    Arch Esp Urol; 2002 May; 55(4):431-8. PubMed ID: 12094488
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Pyelo-ureteral syndrome: the impact of endo-urological techniques].
    Salas Sironvalle M; Gelet A; Cuzin B; Martín X; Marechal JM; Dubernard JM
    Arch Esp Urol; 1991 Jun; 44(5):495-505. PubMed ID: 1759867
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Open surgical exploration after failed endopyelotomy: a 12-year perspective.
    Gupta M; Tuncay OL; Smith AD
    J Urol; 1997 May; 157(5):1613-8; discussion 1618-9. PubMed ID: 9112488
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Antegrade endopyelotomy versus laparoscopic pyeloplasty for primary ureteropelvic junction obstruction.
    Szydełko T; Kopeć R; Kasprzak J; Apoznański W; Kołodziej A; Zdrojowy R; Lorenz J
    J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A; 2009 Feb; 19(1):45-51. PubMed ID: 18976144
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Treatment of ureteropelvic junction obstruction by endopyelotomy.
    Gerber GS
    Tech Urol; 1995; 1(1):31-7. PubMed ID: 9118365
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. McMaster experience with laparoscopic pyeloplasty.
    Hussain A; Whelan P; Piercey K; Kapoor A
    Can J Urol; 2004 Jun; 11(3):2299-302. PubMed ID: 15287998
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Influence of stent size on the success of antegrade endopyelotomy for primary ureteropelvic junction obstruction: results of 2 consecutive series.
    Danuser H; Hochreiter WW; Ackermann DK; Studer UE
    J Urol; 2001 Sep; 166(3):902-9. PubMed ID: 11490243
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.