These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

123 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8073933)

  • 1. [Retropubic radical prostatectomy. II. Neuroanatomy of the pelvic plexus, impotence and urinary incontinence].
    Castiñeiras J; López A; Ronco A; Martín A; Varo C; González D; Palomo MJ; Rodríguez-Rubio F
    Actas Urol Esp; 1994 May; 18 Suppl():444-51. PubMed ID: 8073933
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Recent neuroanatomical studies on the neurovascular bundle of the prostate and cavernosal nerves: clinical reflections on radical prostatectomy.
    Yucel S; Erdogru T; Baykara M
    Asian J Androl; 2005 Dec; 7(4):339-49. PubMed ID: 16281080
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [Techniques for neurovascular bundle preservation during retropubic radical prostatectomy].
    González J; Hernández E
    Arch Esp Urol; 2011 Apr; 64(3):156-67. PubMed ID: 21487166
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Anatomical and electrophysiological assessment of the canine periprostatic neurovascular anatomy: perspectives as a nerve sparing radical prostatectomy model.
    Gianduzzo TR; Colombo JR; El-Gabry E; Haber GP; Gill IS
    J Urol; 2008 May; 179(5):2025-9. PubMed ID: 18355844
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Anatomic basis for the continence-preserving radical retropubic prostatectomy.
    Steiner MS
    Semin Urol Oncol; 2000 Feb; 18(1):9-18. PubMed ID: 10719925
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Anatomical features of periprostatic tissue and its surroundings: a histological analysis of 79 radical retropubic prostatectomy specimens.
    Kiyoshima K; Yokomizo A; Yoshida T; Tomita K; Yonemasu H; Nakamura M; Oda Y; Naito S; Hasegawa Y
    Jpn J Clin Oncol; 2004 Aug; 34(8):463-8. PubMed ID: 15371464
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Impact of nerve sparing technique on patient self-assessed outcomes after radical perineal prostatectomy.
    Kübler HR; Tseng TY; Sun L; Vieweg J; Harris MJ; Dahm P
    J Urol; 2007 Aug; 178(2):488-92; discussion 492. PubMed ID: 17561133
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The inferior hypogastric plexus (pelvic plexus): its importance in neural preservation techniques.
    Mauroy B; Demondion X; Drizenko A; Goullet E; Bonnal JL; Biserte J; Abbou C
    Surg Radiol Anat; 2003 Apr; 25(1):6-15. PubMed ID: 12690518
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Nerve-sparing open radical retropubic prostatectomy.
    Kessler TM; Burkhard FC; Studer UE
    Eur Urol; 2007 Jan; 51(1):90-7. PubMed ID: 17074431
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A novel technique for approaching the endopelvic fascia in retropubic radical prostatectomy, based on an anatomical study of fixed and fresh cadavers.
    Takenaka A; Hara R; Soga H; Murakami G; Fujisawa M
    BJU Int; 2005 Apr; 95(6):766-71. PubMed ID: 15794779
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Patient-reported impotence and incontinence after nerve-sparing radical prostatectomy.
    Walsh PC
    J Urol; 1998 Jan; 159(1):308-9. PubMed ID: 9400499
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Anatomical radical retropubic prostatectomy: 'curtain dissection' of the neurovascular bundle.
    Lunacek A; Schwentner C; Fritsch H; Bartsch G; Strasser H
    BJU Int; 2005 Jun; 95(9):1226-31. PubMed ID: 15892806
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Surgical aspects and innovations in localized prostate cancer].
    Coulange C
    Cancer Radiother; 2005 Nov; 9(6-7):374-6. PubMed ID: 16176882
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Technique for nerve dissection.
    Ghavamian R; Zincke H
    Semin Urol Oncol; 2000 Feb; 18(1):43-5. PubMed ID: 10719930
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Changes in continence and erectile function between 2 and 4 years after radical prostatectomy.
    Glickman L; Godoy G; Lepor H
    J Urol; 2009 Feb; 181(2):731-5. PubMed ID: 19091349
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Differences in sexual function and quality of life after nerve sparing and nonnerve sparing radical retropubic prostatectomy.
    Gralnek D; Wessells H; Cui H; Dalkin BL
    J Urol; 2000 Apr; 163(4):1166-9; discussion 1169-70. PubMed ID: 10737488
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A cadaveric histological investigation of the prostate with three-dimensional reconstruction for better results in continence and erectile function after radical prostatectomy.
    Ozdemir MB; Eskicorapci SY; Baydar DE; Cumhur M; Onderoğlu S; Ozen H
    Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis; 2007; 10(1):77-81. PubMed ID: 17117174
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Recent data upon impotence, incontinence and quality of life issues concerning radical prostatectomy.
    Alivizatos G; Skolarikos A; Laguna P
    Arch Esp Urol; 2003 Apr; 56(3):321-30. PubMed ID: 12768997
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A large prostate at radical retropubic prostatectomy does not adversely affect cancer control, continence or potency rates.
    Foley CL; Bott SR; Thomas K; Parkinson MC; Kirby RS
    BJU Int; 2003 Sep; 92(4):370-4. PubMed ID: 12930421
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Current results and patient selection for nerve-sparing radical retropubic prostatectomy.
    Steiner MS
    Semin Urol Oncol; 1995 Aug; 13(3):204-14. PubMed ID: 8521134
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.