These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

258 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8074092)

  • 1. Frictional forces and surface topography of a new ceramic bracket.
    Tanne K; Matsubara S; Hotei Y; Sakuda M; Yoshida M
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1994 Sep; 106(3):273-8. PubMed ID: 8074092
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Wire friction from ceramic brackets during simulated canine retraction.
    Tanne K; Matsubara S; Shibaguchi T; Sakuda M
    Angle Orthod; 1991; 61(4):285-90; discussion 291-2. PubMed ID: 1763839
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A comparative study of frictional forces between orthodontic brackets and arch wires.
    Bednar JR; Gruendeman GW; Sandrik JL
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1991 Dec; 100(6):513-22. PubMed ID: 1962604
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Static frictional resistances of polycrystalline ceramic brackets with metal slot inserts.
    Rajakulendran J; Jones S
    Aust Orthod J; 2006 Nov; 22(2):147-52. PubMed ID: 17203579
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Relative kinetic frictional forces between sintered stainless steel brackets and orthodontic wires.
    Vaughan JL; Duncanson MG; Nanda RS; Currier GF
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1995 Jan; 107(1):20-7. PubMed ID: 7817958
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Frictional resistances of different bracket-wire combinations.
    Kapur Wadhwa R; Kwon HK; Close JM
    Aust Orthod J; 2004 May; 20(1):25-30. PubMed ID: 15233584
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparative Evaluation of Frictional Resistance Between Different Types of Ceramic Brackets and Stainless Steel Brackets With Teflon-Coated Stainless Steel and Stainless Steel Archwires: An In-Vitro Study.
    Bhat KRR; Ahmed N; Joseph R; Younus A A
    Cureus; 2022 Apr; 14(4):e24161. PubMed ID: 35586355
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Static frictional resistances of polycrystalline ceramic brackets with conventional slots, glazed slots and metal slot inserts.
    Jones SP; Amoah KG
    Aust Orthod J; 2007 May; 23(1):36-40. PubMed ID: 17679533
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. In vitro evaluation of frictional forces between archwires and ceramic brackets.
    Nishio C; da Motta AF; Elias CN; Mucha JN
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2004 Jan; 125(1):56-64. PubMed ID: 14718880
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Evaluation of friction during sliding tooth movement in various bracket-arch wire combinations.
    Loftus BP; Artun J; Nicholls JI; Alonzo TA; Stoner JA
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1999 Sep; 116(3):336-45. PubMed ID: 10474108
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Conventionally ligated versus self-ligating metal brackets--a comparative study.
    Reicheneder CA; Gedrange T; Berrisch S; Proff P; Baumert U; Faltermeier A; Muessig D
    Eur J Orthod; 2008 Dec; 30(6):654-60. PubMed ID: 19028673
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Evaluation of friction between edgewise stainless steel brackets and orthodontic wires of four alloys.
    Kapila S; Angolkar PV; Duncanson MG; Nanda RS
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1990 Aug; 98(2):117-26. PubMed ID: 2378317
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Surface topography and frictional characteristics of ceramic brackets.
    Saunders CR; Kusy RP
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1994 Jul; 106(1):76-87. PubMed ID: 8017353
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. In vitro comparison of frictional forces of a new polycrystalline ceramic bracket versus metal-insert ceramic bracket before and after aging.
    Dergham CA; Khoury E; Ghoubril J
    Int Orthod; 2019 Jun; 17(2):202-207. PubMed ID: 30981676
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparison of Frictional Forces Generated by a New Ceramic Bracket with the Conventional Brackets using Unconventional and Conventional Ligation System and the Self-ligating Brackets: An In Vitro Study.
    Pasha A; Vishwakarma S; Narayan A; Vinay K; Shetty SV; Roy PP
    J Int Oral Health; 2015 Sep; 7(9):108-13. PubMed ID: 26435628
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Correlating Frictional Forces Generated by Different Bracket Types during Sliding and Surface Topography Using Scanning Electron Microscopy and Optical Profilometer.
    AlBadr AH; Talic NF
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2024 Jan; 25(1):41-51. PubMed ID: 38514430
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Ceramic brackets and low friction : A possible synergy in patients requiring multiple MRI scanning.
    Camporesi M; Bulhoes Galvão M; Tortamano A; Dominguez GC; Defraia N; Defraia E; Franchi L
    J Orofac Orthop; 2016 May; 77(3):214-23. PubMed ID: 27098639
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Frictional resistances using Teflon-coated ligatures with various bracket-archwire combinations.
    De Franco DJ; Spiller RE; von Fraunhofer JA
    Angle Orthod; 1995; 65(1):63-72; discussion 73-4. PubMed ID: 7726464
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Frictional resistance between orthodontic brackets and archwires in the buccal segments.
    Taylor NG; Ison K
    Angle Orthod; 1996; 66(3):215-22. PubMed ID: 8805917
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Evaluation of frictional resistance in esthetic brackets.
    Bazakidou E; Nanda RS; Duncanson MG; Sinha P
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1997 Aug; 112(2):138-44. PubMed ID: 9267224
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.