These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

123 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8075415)

  • 21. Test-retest reliability of the acoustic stapedial reflex test in healthy neonates.
    Mazlan R; Kei J; Hickson L
    Ear Hear; 2009 Jun; 30(3):295-301. PubMed ID: 19322092
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Transient-evoked otoacoustic emissions from ears with tympanostomy tubes.
    Fritsch MH; Wynne MK; Diefendorf AO
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2002 Oct; 66(1):29-36. PubMed ID: 12363419
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. The relationship between auditory threshold and evoked otoacoustic emissions.
    Wagner W; Plinkert PK
    Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 1999; 256(4):177-88. PubMed ID: 10337508
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Transient evoked otoacoustic emissions in patients with normal hearing and in patients with hearing loss.
    Hussain DM; Gorga MP; Neely ST; Keefe DH; Peters J
    Ear Hear; 1998 Dec; 19(6):434-49. PubMed ID: 9867292
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Evaluation of cochlear hearing disorders: normative distortion product otoacoustic emission measurements.
    Mills DM; Feeney MP; Gates GA
    Ear Hear; 2007 Dec; 28(6):778-92. PubMed ID: 17982366
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Reliability of contralateral suppression of otoacoustic emissions in children.
    Jedrzejczak WW; Pilka E; Skarzynski PH; Skarzynski H
    Int J Audiol; 2021 Jun; 60(6):438-445. PubMed ID: 33084414
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. A comparison of transiently evoked and distortion-product otoacoustic emissions in humans.
    Probst R; Harris FP
    Prog Brain Res; 1993; 97():91-9. PubMed ID: 8234771
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Transiently evoked otoacoustic emissions in patients with cerebellopontine angle tumors.
    Cane MA; Lutman ME; O'Donoghue GM
    Am J Otol; 1994 Mar; 15(2):207-16. PubMed ID: 8172303
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Detection of hearing loss in young children and adults using otoacoustic emissions.
    Herer GR; Glattke TJ; Rafitis IA; Cummiskey C
    Folia Phoniatr Logop; 1996; 48(3):117-21. PubMed ID: 8768362
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Changes in transient-evoked otoacoustic emission levels with negative tympanometric peak pressure in infants and toddlers.
    Prieve BA; Calandruccio L; Fitzgerald T; Mazevski A; Georgantas LM
    Ear Hear; 2008 Aug; 29(4):533-42. PubMed ID: 18469719
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Tone-burst and click-evoked otoacoustic emissions in subjects with hearing loss above 0.25, 0.5, and 1 kHz.
    Jedrzejczak WW; Kochanek K; Trzaskowski B; Pilka E; Skarzynski PH; Skarzynski H
    Ear Hear; 2012; 33(6):757-67. PubMed ID: 22710662
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Transient evoked otoacoustic emissions recorded using maximum length sequences from patients with sensorineural hearing loss.
    Hine JE; Thornton AR
    Hear Res; 2005 May; 203(1-2):122-33. PubMed ID: 15855037
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Evaluation of cochlear function in patients with tinnitus using spontaneous and transitory evoked otoacoustic emissions.
    Santaolalla Montoya F; Ibargüen AM; del Rey AS; Fernández JM
    J Otolaryngol; 2007 Oct; 36(5):296-302. PubMed ID: 17963669
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Screening all newborns for hearing loss using transient evoked otoacoustic emissions.
    White KR; Vohr BR; Maxon AB; Behrens TR; McPherson MG; Mauk GW
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 1994 Jun; 29(3):203-17. PubMed ID: 8056504
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. [Clinical application of transiently evoked otoacoustic emissions in screening for auditory dysfunction].
    Fuse T; Aoyagi M; Suzuki T; Koike Y
    Nihon Jibiinkoka Gakkai Kaiho; 1993 Jul; 96(7):1125-32. PubMed ID: 8366407
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Transient-evoked and distortion product otoacoustic emissions: A short-term test-retest reliability study.
    Keppler H; Dhooge I; Maes L; D'haenens W; Bockstael A; Philips B; Swinnen F; Vinck B
    Int J Audiol; 2010 Feb; 49(2):99-109. PubMed ID: 20151884
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Transient evoked otoacoustic emissions: feasibility in the nursery.
    Salamy A; Eldredge L; Sweetow R
    Ear Hear; 1996 Feb; 17(1):42-8. PubMed ID: 8741966
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Criteria for detection of transiently evoked otoacoustic emissions in schoolchildren.
    Trzaskowski B; Pilka E; Jedrzejczak WW; Skarzynski H
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2015 Sep; 79(9):1455-61. PubMed ID: 26166450
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Linear versus non-linear recordings of transiently-evoked otoacoustic emissions--methodological considerations.
    Von Specht H; Ganz M; Pethe J; Leuschner S; Pytel J
    Scand Audiol Suppl; 2001; (52):116-8. PubMed ID: 11318439
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. The effect of middle ear pressure on transient evoked otoacoustic emissions.
    Trine MB; Hirsch JE; Margolis RH
    Ear Hear; 1993 Dec; 14(6):401-7. PubMed ID: 8307244
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.