These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

98 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8076722)

  • 1. Frequency-resolution measurements with notched noises for clinical purposes.
    Leeuw AR; Dreschler WA
    Ear Hear; 1994 Jun; 15(3):240-55. PubMed ID: 8076722
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Rapid measurement of auditory filter shape in mice using the auditory brainstem response and notched noise.
    Lina IA; Lauer AM
    Hear Res; 2013 Apr; 298():73-9. PubMed ID: 23347916
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Simplified measurement of auditory filter shapes using the notched-noise method.
    Stone MA; Glasberg BR; Moore BC
    Br J Audiol; 1992 Dec; 26(6):329-34. PubMed ID: 1292815
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Auditory filter asymmetry in the hearing impaired.
    Tyler RS; Hall JW; Glasberg BR; Moore BC; Patterson RD
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1984 Nov; 76(5):1363-8. PubMed ID: 6512098
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Application of Bayesian Active Learning to the Estimation of Auditory Filter Shapes Using the Notched-Noise Method.
    Schlittenlacher J; Turner RE; Moore BCJ
    Trends Hear; 2020; 24():2331216520952992. PubMed ID: 33073723
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Altered attentional filters in subjects with graded levels of sensorineural hearing loss.
    Bester CW; Robertson D; Taljaard D; Hammond G
    Hear Res; 2017 Aug; 351():80-87. PubMed ID: 28610719
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Auditory filter nonlinearity in mild/moderate hearing impairment.
    Baker RJ; Rosen S
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2002 Mar; 111(3):1330-9. PubMed ID: 11931310
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [A comparison of low-chirp- and notched-noise-evoked auditory brainstem response].
    Mühlenberg L; Schade G
    Laryngorhinootologie; 2012 Aug; 91(8):500-4. PubMed ID: 22135225
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Acoustic echoplanar scanner noise and pure tone hearing thresholds: the effects of sequence repetition times and acoustic noise rates.
    Ulmer JL; Biswal BB; Mark LP; Mathews VP; Prost RW; Millen SJ; Garman JN; Horzewski D
    J Comput Assist Tomogr; 1998; 22(3):480-6. PubMed ID: 9606392
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Measuring Temporal Resolution (Release of Masking) with a Hughson-Westlake Up-Down Instead of a Békèsy-Tracking Procedure.
    Rhebergen KS; van Esch TE; Dreschler WA
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2015 Jun; 26(6):563-71. PubMed ID: 26134723
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Tone-on-tone masking in subjects with normal hearing and with sensorineural hearing loss.
    Chung DY
    J Speech Hear Res; 1981 Dec; 24(4):506-13. PubMed ID: 7329047
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Auditory filter nonlinearity at 2 kHz in normal hearing listeners.
    Rosen S; Baker RJ; Darling A
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1998 May; 103(5 Pt 1):2539-50. PubMed ID: 9604348
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Auditory filter shapes for the bottlenose dolphin (Tursiops truncatus) and the white whale (Delphinapterus leucas) derived with notched noise.
    Finneran JJ; Schlundt CE; Carder DA; Ridgway SH
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2002 Jul; 112(1):322-8. PubMed ID: 12141358
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The masking dilemma and its solution. Fusion at the inferred threshold (FIT) and sensorineural acuity level (SAL) tests.
    Chaplin RG; Miyamoto RT
    Am J Otol; 1983 Jul; 5(1):34-9. PubMed ID: 6881307
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Rapid estimation of high-parameter auditory-filter shapes.
    Shen Y; Sivakumar R; Richards VM
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2014 Oct; 136(4):1857-68. PubMed ID: 25324086
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Automated hearing tests: applying the otogram to patients who are difficult to test.
    Yu J; Ostevik A; Hodgetts B; Ho A
    J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2011 Oct; 40(5):376-83. PubMed ID: 22420392
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Effect of stimulus rise time and high-pass masking on early auditory evoked potentials].
    Bunke D; von Specht H; Mühler R; Pethe J; Kevanishvili Z
    Laryngorhinootologie; 1998 Apr; 77(4):185-90. PubMed ID: 9592750
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Effects of signal delay on auditory filter shapes derived from psychophysical tuning curves and notched-noise data obtained in simultaneous masking.
    Bacon SP; Repovsch-Duffey JL; Liu L
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2002 Jul; 112(1):227-37. PubMed ID: 12141348
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Derivation of auditory filter shapes from notched-noise data.
    Glasberg BR; Moore BC
    Hear Res; 1990 Aug; 47(1-2):103-38. PubMed ID: 2228789
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Limited resolution of spectral contrast and hearing loss for speech in noise.
    ter Keurs M; Festen JM; Plomp R
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1993 Sep; 94(3 Pt 1):1307-14. PubMed ID: 8408972
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.