140 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8078652)
1. Resolution as defined by line spread and modulation transfer functions for four digital intraoral radiographic systems.
Welander U; McDavid WD; Sanderink GC; Tronje G; Mörner AC; Dove SB
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1994 Jul; 78(1):109-15. PubMed ID: 8078652
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Image quality of direct digital intraoral x-ray sensors in assessing root canal length. The RadioVisioGraphy, Visualix/VIXA, Sens-A-Ray, and Flash Dent systems compared with Ektaspeed films.
Sanderink GC; Huiskens R; van der Stelt PF; Welander US; Stheeman SE
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1994 Jul; 78(1):125-32. PubMed ID: 8078654
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Modulation transfer function of a digital dental x-ray system.
Chen SK; Hollender L
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1994 Mar; 77(3):308-13. PubMed ID: 8170666
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Sensor noise in direct digital imaging (the RadioVisioGraphy, Sens-a-Ray, and Visualix/Vixa systems) evaluated by subtraction radiography.
Wenzel A
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1994 Jan; 77(1):70-4. PubMed ID: 8108102
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Sens-A-Ray. A new system for direct digital intraoral radiography.
Nelvig P; Wing K; Welander U
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1992 Dec; 74(6):818-23. PubMed ID: 1488241
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Basic technical properties of a system for direct acquisition of digital intraoral radiographs.
Welander U; Nelvig P; Tronje G; McDavid WD; Dove SB; Mörner AC; Cederlund T
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1993 Apr; 75(4):506-16. PubMed ID: 8464618
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Flash Dent: an alternative charge-coupled device/scintillator-based direct digital intraoral radiographic system.
Scarfe WC; Farman AG; Kelly MS
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1994 Feb; 23(1):11-7. PubMed ID: 8181653
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparison of observer performance in determining the position of endodontic files with physical measures in the evaluation of dental X-ray imaging systems.
Vandre RH; Pajak JC; Abdel-Nabi H; Farman TT; Farman AG
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2000 Jul; 29(4):216-22. PubMed ID: 10918454
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Direct digital dental x-ray imaging with visualix/VIXA.
Molteni R
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1993 Aug; 76(2):235-43. PubMed ID: 8361738
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Radiation dosage reduction in general dental practice using digital intraoral radiographic systems.
Hayakawa Y; Shibuya H; Ota Y; Kuroyanagi K
Bull Tokyo Dent Coll; 1997 Feb; 38(1):21-5. PubMed ID: 9566150
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Absolute measures of image quality for the Sens-A-Ray direct digital intraoral radiography system.
Welander U; McDavid WD; Mörner AC; Tronje G; Tokuoka O; Fuchihata H; Nelvig P; Dove SB
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 1995 Sep; 80(3):345-50. PubMed ID: 7489279
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Criteria for the assessment of intrinsic performances of digital radiographic intraoral sensors.
Mondou D; Bonnet E; Coudert JL; Jourlin M; Molteni R; Pachod V
Acad Radiol; 1996 Sep; 3(9):751-7. PubMed ID: 8883516
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A simple method for measuring MTF in direct digital intraoral radiography. Technical note.
McDavid WD; Welander U; Sanderink GC; Dove SB; Tronje G
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1994 Dec; 78(6):802-5. PubMed ID: 7898914
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. An evaluation of the Sens-A-Ray digital dental imaging system.
McDonnell D; Price C
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1993 Aug; 22(3):121-6. PubMed ID: 8299829
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Optical densities of dental resin composites: a comparison of CCD, storage phosphor, and Ektaspeed plus radiographic film.
Farman TT; Farman AG; Scarfe WC; Goldsmith LJ
Gen Dent; 1996; 44(6):532-7. PubMed ID: 9515395
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Physical performance measures of radiographic imaging systems.
Workman A; Brettle DS
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1997 May; 26(3):139-46. PubMed ID: 9442599
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Assessment of image quality in dental radiography, part 2: optimum exposure conditions for detection of small mass changes in 6 intraoral radiography systems.
Yoshiura K; Kawazu T; Chikui T; Tatsumi M; Tokumori K; Tanaka T; Kanda S
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 1999 Jan; 87(1):123-9. PubMed ID: 9927091
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Sensitometric response of the Sens-A-Ray, a charge-coupled imaging device, to changes in beam energy.
Goshima T; Goshima Y; Scarfe WC; Farman AG
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1996 Jan; 25(1):17-8. PubMed ID: 9084280
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Computed dental radiography: evaluation of a new charge-coupled device-based intraoral radiographic system.
Farman AG; Scarfe WC; Schick DB; Rumack PM
Quintessence Int; 1995 Jun; 26(6):399-404. PubMed ID: 8602420
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Radiographic and electronic diagnostic systems.
McDonald NJ
Alpha Omegan; 1991; 84(4):45-8. PubMed ID: 1819963
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
