These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

140 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8078652)

  • 21. Direct digital radiography in the dental office.
    Wenzel A; Gröndahl HG
    Int Dent J; 1995 Feb; 45(1):27-34. PubMed ID: 7607741
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Intraoral computed radiography using the Fuji computed radiography imaging plate. Correlation between image quality and reading condition.
    Kashima I; Sakurai T; Matsuki T; Nakamura K; Aoki H; Ishii M; Kanagawa Y
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1994 Aug; 78(2):239-46. PubMed ID: 7936596
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. [Film-less digital x-ray image processing--new prospects with the RadioVisioGraphy equipment].
    Mairgünther RH
    Schweiz Monatsschr Zahnmed; 1994; 104(1):31-4. PubMed ID: 8108689
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. An objective comparison of four digital intra-oral radiographic systems: sensitometric properties and resolution.
    Araki K; Endo A; Okano T
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2000 Mar; 29(2):76-80. PubMed ID: 10808219
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Some characteristics of solid-state and photo-stimulable phosphor detectors for intra-oral radiography.
    Borg E
    Swed Dent J Suppl; 1999; 139():i-viii, 1-67. PubMed ID: 10635104
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Principles of digital radiography with large-area, electronically readable detectors: a review of the basics.
    Chotas HG; Dobbins JT; Ravin CE
    Radiology; 1999 Mar; 210(3):595-9. PubMed ID: 10207454
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Acquisition hardware for digital imaging.
    Widmer WR
    Vet Radiol Ultrasound; 2008; 49(1 Suppl 1):S2-8. PubMed ID: 18283979
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Standards for intraoral radiographic imaging.
    Farman AG
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2000 Sep; 29(5):257-9. PubMed ID: 10980558
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Sens-A-Ray characteristics with variations in beam quality.
    Harada T; Nishikawa K; Shibuya H; Hayakawa Y; Kuroyanagi K
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 1995 Jul; 80(1):120-3. PubMed ID: 7552852
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. 35-mm film scanner as an intraoral dental radiograph digitizer. II: Effects of brightness and contrast adjustments.
    Shrout MK; Potter BJ; Yurgalavage MH; Hildebolt CF; Vannier MW
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1993 Oct; 76(4):510-8. PubMed ID: 8233433
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. A comparison of 18 different x-ray detectors currently used in dentistry.
    Farman AG; Farman TT
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2005 Apr; 99(4):485-9. PubMed ID: 15772598
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Evaluation of the new RadioVisioGraphy system image quality.
    Benz C; Mouyen F
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1991 Nov; 72(5):627-31. PubMed ID: 1745524
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Evaluation of new radiographic screens for intraoral radiography.
    Dawood FF; Manson-Hing LR
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1979 Aug; 48(2):178-86. PubMed ID: 289085
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. [Specific features of monitoring the characteristics of digital X-ray diagnostic systems].
    Zelikman MI
    Med Tekh; 2002; (5):3-6. PubMed ID: 12512272
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Presentation and physical evaluation of RadioVisioGraphy.
    Mouyen F; Benz C; Sonnabend E; Lodter JP
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1989 Aug; 68(2):238-42. PubMed ID: 2780024
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Imaging: new versus traditional technological aids.
    Sanderink GC
    Int Dent J; 1993 Aug; 43(4):335-42. PubMed ID: 8276517
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Perceptibility of defects in an aluminum test object: a comparison of the RVG-S and first generation VIXA systems with and without added niobium filtration.
    Wakoh M; Farman AG; Scarfe WC; Kelly MS; Kuroyanagi K
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1995 Nov; 24(4):211-4. PubMed ID: 9161163
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. The perceptibility curve test applied to direct digital dental radiography.
    Yoshiura K; Stamatakis H; Shi XQ; Welander U; McDavid WD; Kristoffersen J; Tronje G
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1998 May; 27(3):131-5. PubMed ID: 9693524
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Performance characteristics of a Kodak computed radiography system.
    Bradford CD; Peppler WW; Dobbins JT
    Med Phys; 1999 Jan; 26(1):27-37. PubMed ID: 9949395
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. 35-mm film scanner as an intraoral dental radiograph digitizer. I: A quantitative evaluation.
    Shrout MK; Potter BJ; Yurgalavage HM; Hildebolt CF; Vannier MW
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1993 Oct; 76(4):502-9. PubMed ID: 8233432
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.