172 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8078654)
1. Image quality of direct digital intraoral x-ray sensors in assessing root canal length. The RadioVisioGraphy, Visualix/VIXA, Sens-A-Ray, and Flash Dent systems compared with Ektaspeed films.
Sanderink GC; Huiskens R; van der Stelt PF; Welander US; Stheeman SE
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1994 Jul; 78(1):125-32. PubMed ID: 8078654
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Resolution as defined by line spread and modulation transfer functions for four digital intraoral radiographic systems.
Welander U; McDavid WD; Sanderink GC; Tronje G; Mörner AC; Dove SB
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1994 Jul; 78(1):109-15. PubMed ID: 8078652
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison of observer performance in determining the position of endodontic files with physical measures in the evaluation of dental X-ray imaging systems.
Vandre RH; Pajak JC; Abdel-Nabi H; Farman TT; Farman AG
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2000 Jul; 29(4):216-22. PubMed ID: 10918454
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Endodontic measurement accuracy and perceived radiograph quality: effects of film speed and density.
Sheaffer JC; Eleazer PD; Scheetz JP; Clark SJ; Farman AG
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2003 Oct; 96(4):441-8. PubMed ID: 14561969
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Interpretation of endodontic file lengths using RadioVisiography.
Leddy BJ; Miles DA; Newton CW; Brown CE
J Endod; 1994 Nov; 20(11):542-5. PubMed ID: 7643038
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Sensor noise in direct digital imaging (the RadioVisioGraphy, Sens-a-Ray, and Visualix/Vixa systems) evaluated by subtraction radiography.
Wenzel A
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1994 Jan; 77(1):70-4. PubMed ID: 8108102
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Radiovisiography for length estimation in root canal treatment: an in-vitro comparison with conventional radiography.
Shearer AC; Horner K; Wilson NH
Int Endod J; 1991 Sep; 24(5):233-9. PubMed ID: 1813427
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Dose reduction of two digital sensor systems measuring file lengths.
Velders XL; Sanderink GC; van der Stelt PF
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 1996 May; 81(5):607-12. PubMed ID: 8734712
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison of radiovisiography with radiographic film in root length determination.
Ong EY; Pitt Ford TR
Int Endod J; 1995 Jan; 28(1):25-9. PubMed ID: 7642325
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Radiovisiography versus conventional radiography for detection of small instruments in endodontic length determination. Part 1. In vitro evaluation.
Ellingsen MA; Harrington GW; Hollender LG
J Endod; 1995 Jun; 21(6):326-31. PubMed ID: 7673842
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Evaluation of endodontic files in digital radiographs before and after employing three image processing algorithms.
Li G; Sanderink GC; Welander U; McDavid WD; Näsström K
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2004 Jan; 33(1):6-11. PubMed ID: 15140815
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Radiographic and electronic diagnostic systems.
McDonald NJ
Alpha Omegan; 1991; 84(4):45-8. PubMed ID: 1819963
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Radiographic determination of canal length direct digital radiography versus conventional radiography.
Hedrick RT; Dove SB; Peters DD; McDavid WD
J Endod; 1994 Jul; 20(7):320-6. PubMed ID: 7996092
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. An in vitro comparison of 10 radiographic methods for working length estimation.
Rushton VE; Shearer AC; Horner K; Czajka J
Int Endod J; 1995 May; 28(3):149-53. PubMed ID: 8626199
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Measurement algorithm accuracy of the RVG-PCi in vertical and diagonal assessments at various beam energies.
Garlock JA; Scarfe WC; Kamer KR; Farman AG
J Endod; 1996 Dec; 22(12):646-50. PubMed ID: 9220748
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The use of E-speed film for root canal length determination.
Powell-Cullingford AW; Pitt Ford TR
Int Endod J; 1993 Sep; 26(5):268-72. PubMed ID: 8300258
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Radiovisiography versus conventional radiography for detection of small instruments in endodontic length determination. II. In vivo evaluation.
Ellingsen MA; Hollender LG; Harrington GW
J Endod; 1995 Oct; 21(10):516-20. PubMed ID: 8596074
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Radiovisiography for imaging root canals: an in vitro comparison with conventional radiography.
Shearer AC; Horner K; Wilson NH
Quintessence Int; 1990 Oct; 21(10):789-94. PubMed ID: 2082410
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Radiation dosage reduction in general dental practice using digital intraoral radiographic systems.
Hayakawa Y; Shibuya H; Ota Y; Kuroyanagi K
Bull Tokyo Dent Coll; 1997 Feb; 38(1):21-5. PubMed ID: 9566150
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Endodontic working length assessment. Comparison of storage phosphor digital imaging and radiographic film.
Cederberg RA; Tidwell E; Frederiksen NL; Benson BW
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 1998 Mar; 85(3):325-8. PubMed ID: 9540092
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
