These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

86 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8079143)

  • 1. [The effect of different liner materials on the polymerization of composites].
    Lussi AR; Hotz P
    Schweiz Monatsschr Zahnmed; 1994; 104(7):854-8. PubMed ID: 8079143
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [The modification of the polymerization of composite materials by eugenol-containing temporary fillings].
    Hotz P; Schlatter D; Lussi A
    Schweiz Monatsschr Zahnmed; 1992; 102(12):1461-6. PubMed ID: 1475669
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Cuspal deflection in premolar teeth restored using current composite resins with and without resin-modified glass ionomer liner.
    Karaman E; Ozgunaltay G
    Oper Dent; 2013; 38(3):282-9. PubMed ID: 23092141
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Effect of flowable composite liner and glass ionomer liner on class II gingival marginal adaptation of direct composite restorations with different bonding strategies.
    Aggarwal V; Singla M; Yadav S; Yadav H
    J Dent; 2014 May; 42(5):619-25. PubMed ID: 24631232
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Influence of curing time and distance on microhardness of eight light-cured liners.
    Murchison DF; Moore BK
    Oper Dent; 1992; 17(4):135-41. PubMed ID: 1337601
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Effects of cements and eugenol on properties of a visible light-cured composite.
    Powell TL; Huget EF
    Pediatr Dent; 1993; 15(2):104-7. PubMed ID: 8327359
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Posterior resin composite restorations with or without resin-modified, glass-ionomer cement lining: a 1-year randomized, clinical trial.
    Banomyong D; Harnirattisai C; Burrow MF
    J Investig Clin Dent; 2011 Feb; 2(1):63-9. PubMed ID: 25427330
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A suitable base material for composite resin restorations: zinc oxide eugenol.
    He LH; Purton DG; Swain MV
    J Dent; 2010 Apr; 38(4):290-5. PubMed ID: 19961894
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Relative curing degree of polyacid-modified and conventional resin composites determined by surface Knoop hardness.
    Koupis NS; Martens LC; Verbeeck RM
    Dent Mater; 2006 Nov; 22(11):1045-50. PubMed ID: 16388844
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Effect of layering methods, composite type, and flowable liner on the polymerization shrinkage stress of light cured composites.
    Kwon Y; Ferracane J; Lee IB
    Dent Mater; 2012 Jul; 28(7):801-9. PubMed ID: 22575738
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A comparison of the wear resistance and hardness of indirect composite resins.
    Mandikos MN; McGivney GP; Davis E; Bush PJ; Carter JM
    J Prosthet Dent; 2001 Apr; 85(4):386-95. PubMed ID: 11319537
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. In vitro comparison of microleakage of posterior resin composites with and without liner using two-step etch-and-rinse and self-etch dentin adhesive systems.
    Kasraei S; Azarsina M; Majidi S
    Oper Dent; 2011; 36(2):213-21. PubMed ID: 21702678
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Effect of configuration factor on gap formation in hybrid composite resin, low-shrinkage composite resin and resin-modified glass ionomer.
    Boroujeni PM; Mousavinasab SM; Hasanli E
    J Investig Clin Dent; 2015 May; 6(2):156-60. PubMed ID: 24415719
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Fatigue limits for composite restorations with and without glass ionomer cement liners.
    Assis CP; Moyses MR; Teixeira HM; Ribeiro JC; Ribeiro JG; Dias SC
    Gen Dent; 2009; 57(5):485-9; quiz 490-1, 535-6. PubMed ID: 19903639
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Polymerization shrinkage of different types of composite resins and microleakage with and without liner in class II cavities.
    Karaman E; Ozgunaltay G
    Oper Dent; 2014; 39(3):325-31. PubMed ID: 24147747
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Push-out bond strengths of different dental cements used to cement glass fiber posts.
    Pereira JR; Lins do Valle A; Ghizoni JS; Lorenzoni FC; Ramos MB; Dos Reis Só MV
    J Prosthet Dent; 2013 Aug; 110(2):134-40. PubMed ID: 23929375
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Retention strengths of five luting cements on prefabricated dowels after root canal obturation with a zinc oxide/eugenol sealer: 1. Dowel space preparation/cementation at one week after obturation.
    Hagge MS; Wong RD; Lindemuth JS
    J Prosthodont; 2002 Sep; 11(3):168-75. PubMed ID: 12237797
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Effect of conventional and resin-modified glass-ionomer liner on dentin adhesive interface of Class I cavity walls after thermocycling.
    Sampaio PC; de Almeida Júnior AA; Francisconi LF; Casas-Apayco LC; Pereira JC; Wang L; Atta MT
    Oper Dent; 2011; 36(4):403-12. PubMed ID: 21913841
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Comparative biological testing of Ketac-Bond glass ionomer cement].
    Beer R; Gängler P; Wutzler P; Krehan F
    Dtsch Zahnarztl Z; 1990 Apr; 45(4):202-8. PubMed ID: 2257828
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Interactions between cavity preparation and restoration events and their effects on pulp vitality.
    Wisithphrom K; Murray PE; About I; Windsor LJ
    Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent; 2006 Dec; 26(6):596-605. PubMed ID: 17243333
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.