These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

117 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8079669)

  • 21. Precision of dual X-ray absorptiometry and peripheral computed tomography using mobile densitometry units.
    Wapniarz M; Lehmann R; Randerath O; Baedeker S; John W; Klein K; Allolio B
    Calcif Tissue Int; 1994 Mar; 54(3):219-23. PubMed ID: 8055370
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. The use of different dual X-ray absorptiometry brands in a multicenter clinical trial: consequences and limits.
    Slosman DO; Provvedini DM; Meunier PJ; Delmas PD; Sebert JL; De Vernejoul MC; Tsouderos Y; Reginster JY
    J Clin Densitom; 1999; 2(1):37-44. PubMed ID: 23547312
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Dual X-ray absorptiometry quality control: comparison of visual examination and process-control charts.
    Lu Y; Mathur AK; Blunt BA; Gluer CC; Will AS; Fuerst TP; Jergas MD; Andriano KN; Cummings SR; Genant HK
    J Bone Miner Res; 1996 May; 11(5):626-37. PubMed ID: 9157777
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. The long-term performance of DXA bone densitometers.
    Wells J; Ryan PJ
    Br J Radiol; 2000 Jul; 73(871):737-9. PubMed ID: 11089465
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Replacing DXA scanners: cross-calibration with phantoms may be misleading.
    Blake GM
    Calcif Tissue Int; 1996 Jul; 59(1):1-5. PubMed ID: 8661987
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Bone mineral density measures in longitudinal studies: the choice of phantom is crucial for quality assessment. The Tromsø study, a population-based study.
    Emaus N; Berntsen GK; Joakimsen R; Fønnebø V
    Osteoporos Int; 2005 Dec; 16(12):1597-603. PubMed ID: 15886862
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Technical standardization for dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry.
    Writing Group for the ISCD Position Development Conference
    J Clin Densitom; 2004; 7(1):27-36. PubMed ID: 14742885
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Suspension criteria for dual energy X ray absorptiometry.
    McLean ID
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2013 Feb; 153(2):227-9. PubMed ID: 23169815
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Quality in dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry scans.
    Morgan SL; Prater GL
    Bone; 2017 Nov; 104():13-28. PubMed ID: 28159711
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. [Cross-calibration of bone volume assessment].
    Yamazaki K
    Nihon Rinsho; 2004 Feb; 62 Suppl 2():309-11. PubMed ID: 15035143
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Universal standardization for dual X-ray absorptiometry: patient and phantom cross-calibration results.
    Genant HK
    J Bone Miner Res; 1995 Jun; 10(6):997-8. PubMed ID: 7572326
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Standards and measurements for assessing bone health-workshop report co-sponsored by the International Society for Clinical Densitometry (ISCD) and the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST).
    Bennett HS; Dienstfrey A; Hudson LT; Oreskovic T; Fuerst T; Shepherd J
    J Clin Densitom; 2006; 9(4):399-405. PubMed ID: 17097524
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Assessment of changes in dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry performance following a system upgrade.
    Simmons A; Barrington SF; Archbold LJ; O'Doherty MJ; Coakley AJ
    Nucl Med Commun; 1996 Apr; 17(4):331-41. PubMed ID: 8786870
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Universal standardization of forearm bone densitometry.
    Shepherd JA; Cheng XG; Lu Y; Njeh C; Toschke J; Engelke K; Grigorian M; Genant HK
    J Bone Miner Res; 2002 Apr; 17(4):734-45. PubMed ID: 11918231
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Analysis of ISCD-NIST survey for bone health.
    Dienstfrey A; Oreskovic T; Bennett H; Hudson L
    J Clin Densitom; 2009; 12(2):162-9. PubMed ID: 19181551
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. DXA longitudinal quality control: a comparison of inbuilt quality assurance, visual inspection, multi-rule Shewhart charts and Cusum analysis.
    Garland SW; Lees B; Stevenson JC
    Osteoporos Int; 1997; 7(3):231-7. PubMed ID: 9205636
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. A Qualitative Examination of the Ward Region of Interest as Imaged on Dual-Energy X-ray Absorptiometry Examinations: The "Wandering Ward Sign".
    Lentle B; Hammond I; Worsley D; Colquhoun A; Grochowski C; Leggett J; Gill S
    J Clin Densitom; 2016 Oct; 19(4):515-521. PubMed ID: 27102659
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Quality assurance and precision of dual photon absorptiometry in bone mineral measurement.
    Tzen KY; Wu C
    Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi (Taipei); 1989 Jan; 43(1):1-8. PubMed ID: 2766058
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Precision and accuracy of DXA and pQCT for densitometry of the rat femur.
    Horton JA; Murray GM; Spadaro JA; Margulies BS; Allen MJ; Damron TA
    J Clin Densitom; 2003; 6(4):381-90. PubMed ID: 14716052
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Cross-calibration and minimum precision standards for dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry: the 2005 ISCD Official Positions.
    Shepherd JA; Lu Y; Wilson K; Fuerst T; Genant H; Hangartner TN; Wilson C; Hans D; Leib ES;
    J Clin Densitom; 2006; 9(1):31-6. PubMed ID: 16731429
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.