These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

116 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8081428)

  • 1. Comparison of bioelectric impedance and near-infrared interactance for body composition assessment in a population of self-perceived overweight adults.
    Wilmore KM; McBride PJ; Wilmore JH
    Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord; 1994 Jun; 18(6):375-81. PubMed ID: 8081428
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Assessing body composition before and after resistance or endurance training.
    Broeder CE; Burrhus KA; Svanevik LS; Volpe J; Wilmore JH
    Med Sci Sports Exerc; 1997 May; 29(5):705-12. PubMed ID: 9140911
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparison of four methods to assess body composition in women.
    Eaton AW; Israel RG; O'Brien KF; Hortobagyi T; McCammon MR
    Eur J Clin Nutr; 1993 May; 47(5):353-60. PubMed ID: 8319671
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Bioelectric impedance and hydrostatic weighing with and without head submersion in persons who are morbidly obese.
    Heath EM; Adams TD; Daines MM; Hunt SC
    J Am Diet Assoc; 1998 Aug; 98(8):869-75. PubMed ID: 9710656
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Practical techniques for assessing body composition in middle-aged and older adults.
    Williams DP; Going SB; Milliken LA; Hall MC; Lohman TG
    Med Sci Sports Exerc; 1995 May; 27(5):776-83. PubMed ID: 7674884
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Use of skinfolds and bioelectrical impedance for body composition assessment after weight reduction.
    Paijmans IJ; Wilmore KM; Wilmore JH
    J Am Coll Nutr; 1992 Apr; 11(2):145-51. PubMed ID: 1578089
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The prediction of body composition in Chinese Australian females.
    Lanham DA; Stead MA; Tsang K; Davies PS
    Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord; 2001 Feb; 25(2):286-91. PubMed ID: 11410833
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Validity of percent body fat estimations in males.
    Stout JR; Eckerson JM; Housh TJ; Johnson GO; Betts NM
    Med Sci Sports Exerc; 1994 May; 26(5):632-6. PubMed ID: 8007813
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Predictive accuracy of three field methods for estimating relative body fatness of nonobese and obese women.
    Heyward VH; Cook KL; Hicks VL; Jenkins KA; Quatrochi JA; Wilson WL
    Int J Sport Nutr; 1992 Mar; 2(1):75-86. PubMed ID: 1299485
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Evaluation of leg-to-leg BIA in assessing body composition in high-school-aged males and females.
    Unick JL; Utter AC; Schumm S; McInnis T
    Res Sports Med; 2006; 14(4):301-13. PubMed ID: 17214406
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Validity of "generalized" equations for body composition analysis in male athletes.
    Sinning WE; Dolny DG; Little KD; Cunningham LN; Racaniello A; Siconolfi SF; Sholes JL
    Med Sci Sports Exerc; 1985 Feb; 17(1):124-30. PubMed ID: 3982266
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Validation of bioelectrical impedance analysis to hydrostatic weighing in male body builders.
    Volpe SL; Melanson EL; Kline G
    Acta Diabetol; 2010 Mar; 47(1):55-8. PubMed ID: 19219400
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Reliability and validity of body composition measures in female athletes.
    Fornetti WC; Pivarnik JM; Foley JM; Fiechtner JJ
    J Appl Physiol (1985); 1999 Sep; 87(3):1114-22. PubMed ID: 10484585
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Validity of the BOD POD for assessing body composition in athletic high school boys.
    Moon JR; Tobkin SE; Costa PB; Smalls M; Mieding WK; O'Kroy JA; Zoeller RF; Stout JR
    J Strength Cond Res; 2008 Jan; 22(1):263-8. PubMed ID: 18296985
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Estimation in community surveys of total body fat of children using bioelectrical impedance or skinfold thickness measurements.
    Hammond J; Rona RJ; Chinn S
    Eur J Clin Nutr; 1994 Mar; 48(3):164-71. PubMed ID: 8194501
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Evaluation of near infra-red interactance for assessment of subcutaneous and total body fat.
    Brooke-Wavell K; Jones PR; Norgan NG; Hardman AE
    Eur J Clin Nutr; 1995 Jan; 49(1):57-65. PubMed ID: 7713052
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparative evaluation of body composition methods and predictions, and calculation of density and hydration fraction of fat-free mass, in obese women.
    Fuller NJ; Sawyer MB; Elia M
    Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord; 1994 Jul; 18(7):503-12. PubMed ID: 7920877
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Differences in estimates of percent body fat using bioelectrical impedance.
    Kaminsky LA; Whaley MH
    J Sports Med Phys Fitness; 1993 Jun; 33(2):172-7. PubMed ID: 8412053
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Validity of Futrex-5000 for body composition determination.
    McLean KP; Skinner JS
    Med Sci Sports Exerc; 1992 Feb; 24(2):253-8. PubMed ID: 1549016
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Assessment of body composition in ballett dancers: correlation among anthropometric measurements, bio-electrical impedance analysis, and dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry.
    Eliakim A; Ish-Shalom S; Giladi A; Falk B; Constantini N
    Int J Sports Med; 2000 Nov; 21(8):598-601. PubMed ID: 11156282
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.