These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

83 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8082443)

  • 1. [The application of modified fetal biophysical profile scoring for prenatal monitoring].
    Ou XD; Liu XX; Liang RX
    Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 1994 Apr; 29(4):213-6, 252. PubMed ID: 8082443
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Doppler and B-mode ultrasonography in biophysical profile scoring.
    Sener T; Ozalp S; Hassa H; Yildirim A
    Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 1996 Sep; 54(3):231-6. PubMed ID: 8889630
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Antepartum fetal risk assessment: the role of the fetal biophysical profile score.
    Manning FA; Menticoglou S; Harman CR; Morrison I; Lange IR
    Baillieres Clin Obstet Gynaecol; 1987 Mar; 1(1):55-72. PubMed ID: 3311513
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Fetal biophysical profile score in triplet pregnancies.
    Alcalay M; Lipitz S; Ben Rafael Z; Barkai G; Mashiach S
    J Reprod Med; 1994 Jun; 39(6):436-40. PubMed ID: 7932395
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Assessment of fetal well-being with ultrasound.
    Manning FA; Harman CR; Menticoglou S; Morrison I
    Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am; 1991 Dec; 18(4):891-905. PubMed ID: 1803308
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Fetal assessment based on fetal biophysical profile scoring: experience in 12,620 referred high-risk pregnancies. I. Perinatal mortality by frequency and etiology.
    Manning FA; Morrison I; Lange IR; Harman CR; Chamberlain PF
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1985 Feb; 151(3):343-50. PubMed ID: 3881967
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Prediction of infection complicating premature rupture of the membranes by monitoring fetal breathing movement with ultrasound].
    He JP
    Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 1990 Sep; 25(5):288-90, 316-7. PubMed ID: 2282852
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Ultrasound assessment of the fetal biophysical profile: what does an radiologist need to know?
    Guimarães Filho HA; Araujo Júnior E; Nardozza LM; Dias da Costa LL; Moron AF; Mattar R
    Eur J Radiol; 2008 Apr; 66(1):122-6. PubMed ID: 17587525
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Intrapartum foetal heart rate monitoring--continuous electronic versus intermittent Doppler--a randomised controlled trial.
    Mahomed K; Nyoni R; Mlambo T; Jacobus E; Kasule J
    Cent Afr J Med; 1992 Dec; 38(12):458-62. PubMed ID: 1340797
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Fetal biophysical profile score and perinatal outcome.
    Manandhar BL; Giri K; Rana A
    J Nepal Health Res Counc; 2013 Sep; 11(25):269-72. PubMed ID: 24908529
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Perinatal monitoring of fetal well-being in the presence of congenital heart block.
    Friedman DM; Zervoudakis I; Buyon JP
    Am J Perinatol; 1998; 15(12):669-73. PubMed ID: 10333393
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Biophysical profile in prolonged pregnancy. Another alternative to fetal monitoring].
    Jiménez Solis G; Izquierdo Puente JC; Barraza Espinoza RM; Sánchez Tenorio E; García Alonso A
    Ginecol Obstet Mex; 1990 Oct; 58():284-8. PubMed ID: 2292430
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Antepartum testing in postterm pregnancy.
    Benedetti TJ; Easterling T
    J Reprod Med; 1988 Mar; 33(3):252-8. PubMed ID: 3283352
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Evaluation of fetal well-being using a modified Doppler flowmetric profile].
    Romero Gutiérrez G; Vargas Origel A; Zamora Orozco J; Alvarado López MR
    Ginecol Obstet Mex; 2000 Sep; 68():371-80. PubMed ID: 11080943
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Biophysical profile in prolonged pregnancy. Another alternative of fetal surveillance].
    Jiménez Solis G; Izquierdo Puente JC; Barraza Espinoza RM; Sánchez Tenorio E; García Alonso A
    Ginecol Obstet Mex; 1990 Oct; 58():284-8. PubMed ID: 2101378
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The value of a negative antepartum test: contraction stress test and modified biophysical profile.
    Nageotte MP; Towers CV; Asrat T; Freeman RK; Dorchester W
    Obstet Gynecol; 1994 Aug; 84(2):231-4. PubMed ID: 8041536
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Fetal biophysical profile and perinatal death.
    Baskett TF; Allen AC; Gray JH; Young DC; Young LM
    Obstet Gynecol; 1987 Sep; 70(3 Pt 1):357-60. PubMed ID: 3306498
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Further experience with the fetal biophysical profile.
    Platt LD; Eglinton GS; Sipos L; Broussard PM; Paul RH
    Obstet Gynecol; 1983 Apr; 61(4):480-5. PubMed ID: 6681892
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A randomized trial of intrapartum electronic fetal heart rate monitoring versus intermittent auscultation.
    Vintzileos AM; Antsaklis A; Varvarigos I; Papas C; Sofatzis I; Montgomery JT
    Obstet Gynecol; 1993 Jun; 81(6):899-907. PubMed ID: 8497353
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Clinical experience of long-distance electronic fetal heart rate monitoring system by telephone].
    Pan J; Ye M; Du X
    Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2000 Jan; 35(1):14-6. PubMed ID: 11831941
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.