BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

134 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8082962)

  • 1. Incidence, causes and surgical methods for hysterectomy in Finland, 1987-1989.
    Luoto R; Kaprio J; Keskimäki I; Pohjanlahti JP; Rutanen EM
    Int J Epidemiol; 1994 Apr; 23(2):348-58. PubMed ID: 8082962
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Laparoscopically assisted vaginal hysterectomy in a university hospital. Decreasing the need for abdominal hysterectomy and increasing resident experience in vaginal surgery.
    Fylstra DL; Carter JF
    J Reprod Med; 1996 Jul; 41(7):497-503. PubMed ID: 8829062
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Five gynecologic diagnoses associated with hysterectomy--trends in incidence of hospitalizations in Finland, 1971-1986.
    Luoto R; Rutanen EM; Kaprio J
    Maturitas; 1994 Aug; 19(2):141-52. PubMed ID: 7968647
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Hysterectomy trends in Finland in 1987-1995--a register based analysis.
    Vuorma S; Teperi J; Hurskainen R; Keskimäki I; Kujansuu E
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 1998 Aug; 77(7):770-6. PubMed ID: 9740527
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Decreasing trend and changing indications of hysterectomy in Finland.
    Hakkarainen J; Nevala A; Tomás E; Nieminen K; Malila N; Pitkäniemi J; Auranen A
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2021 Sep; 100(9):1722-1729. PubMed ID: 33797081
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The incidence of unexpected gynaecological malignancies in hysterectomies carried out for benign indications.
    Yildiz G; Mat E; Yildiz P; Gundogdu EC; Basol G; Kurt D; Kale A
    J Obstet Gynaecol; 2021 Feb; 41(2):298-304. PubMed ID: 33448228
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Hysterectomies in Finland in 1990-2012: comparison of outcomes between trainees and specialists.
    Jokinen E; Brummer T; Jalkanen J; Fraser J; Heikkinen AM; Mäkinen J; Sjöberg J; Tomàs E; Mikkola TS; Härkki P
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2015 Jul; 94(7):701-707. PubMed ID: 25867490
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Factors affecting prophylactic oophorectomy in postmenopausal women.
    Gross CP; Nicholson W; Powe NR
    Obstet Gynecol; 1999 Dec; 94(6):962-8. PubMed ID: 10576183
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Histopathological analysis of hysterectomy specimens.
    Jha R; Pant AD; Jha A; Adhikari RC; Sayami G
    JNMA J Nepal Med Assoc; 2006; 45(163):283-90. PubMed ID: 17334416
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Socioeconomic variations in hysterectomy: evidence from a linkage study of the Finnish hospital discharge register and population census.
    Luoto R; Keskimäki I; Reunanen A
    J Epidemiol Community Health; 1997 Feb; 51(1):67-73. PubMed ID: 9135791
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Hysterectomy types in Estonia are still different from the Nordic countries.
    Veerus P; Lang K; Toompere K; Kirss F
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2015 May; 94(5):489-93. PubMed ID: 25711677
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Patient, surgeon, and hospital disparities associated with benign hysterectomy approach and perioperative complications.
    Mehta A; Xu T; Hutfless S; Makary MA; Sinno AK; Tanner EJ; Stone RL; Wang K; Fader AN
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2017 May; 216(5):497.e1-497.e10. PubMed ID: 28034651
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [COMPARISON OF LAPAROSCOPIC ASSISTED VAGINAL HYSTERECTOMY AND VAGINAL HYSTERECTOMY FOR BENIGN DISEASES AND LESIONS OF THE FEMALE GENITAL SYSTEM].
    Kovachev S; Ganovska A; Stankova T
    Akush Ginekol (Sofiia); 2016; 55 Suppl 1 Pt 1():4-10. PubMed ID: 27514161
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Hysterectomy trends in Australia--between 2000/01 and 2004/05.
    Hill EL; Graham ML; Shelley JM
    Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol; 2010 Apr; 50(2):153-8. PubMed ID: 20522072
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Effect of hysterectomy and ovariectomy on the incidence of malignant neoplasms of the female genital tract].
    Di Bonito L; Patriarca S; Tomasic G; Delendi M; Grandi G; Stanta G
    Minerva Ginecol; 1990 Oct; 42(10):387-92. PubMed ID: 2290594
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Occult Gynecologic Cancer in Women Undergoing Hysterectomy or Myomectomy for Benign Indications.
    Desai VB; Wright JD; Schwartz PE; Jorgensen EM; Fan L; Litkouhi B; Lin H; Gross CP; Xu X
    Obstet Gynecol; 2018 Apr; 131(4):642-651. PubMed ID: 29528920
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Removal of normal ovaries in women under age 51 at the time of hysterectomy.
    Karp NE; Fenner DE; Burgunder-Zdravkovski L; Morgan DM
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2015 Nov; 213(5):716.e1-6. PubMed ID: 26032038
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Assessing the role of laparoscopically assisted vaginal hysterectomy in the everyday practice of gynecology.
    Han GS
    J Reprod Med; 1996 Jul; 41(7):521-8. PubMed ID: 8829066
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Recent estimates of the incidence of hysterectomy in New South Wales and trends over the past 30 years.
    Yusuf F; Leeder S; Wilson A
    Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol; 2016 Aug; 56(4):420-5. PubMed ID: 27297684
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Removal or preservation of ovaries during hysterectomy: a six year review.
    Loizzi P; Carriero C; Di Gesù A; Greco P; Nappi R
    Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 1990 Mar; 31(3):257-61. PubMed ID: 1969367
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.