151 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8083092)
1. Optimizing the dose rate and technique in cervical carcinoma--balancing cases versus complications.
Petereit DG; Fowler JF; Kinsella TJ
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 1994 Jul; 29(5):1195-7. PubMed ID: 8083092
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. [Method for evaluating long term complications. A study from a phase III trial comparing two low dose rates in gynecologic brachytherapy].
Lancar R; Kramar A; Haie-Meder C; Lambin P; Bouzy J; Scalliet P; Gerbaulet A
Bull Cancer; 1994 Jul; 81(7):632-7. PubMed ID: 7742607
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. High dose rate cobalt-60 afterloading intracavitary therapy of uterine cervical carcinomas in Srinagarind hospital - analysis of complications.
Pesee M; Krusun S; Padoongcharoen P
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2010; 11(2):491-4. PubMed ID: 20843138
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. [Complications of treatments of invasive cancers of the uterine cervix with intact uterus: results and prevention].
Barillot I; Maingon P; Truc G; Horiot JC
Cancer Radiother; 2000; 4(2):147-58. PubMed ID: 10812361
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Lack of the dose-rate effect of 192Ir source activity on pelvic control and late complications after high-dose-rate brachytherapy for cervical cancer.
Chen SW; Liang JA; Shiau AC; Yu CY; Hung YC; Yeh LS; Chang WC; Lin WC; Yang SN; Lin FJ
J Radiat Res; 2010; 51(2):173-9. PubMed ID: 20339254
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [High-dose intracavitary brachytherapy of a recurrent cervical cancer following surgery].
Kumagaya H; Ito H; Hashimoto S
Gan No Rinsho; 1990 Jan; 36(1):51-6. PubMed ID: 2299791
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Radiation-induced bowel complications: laparoscopic versus open staging of gynecologic malignancy.
Ghezzi F; Cromi A; Serati M; Uccella S; Formenti G; Bogani G; Vanoli P
Ann Surg Oncol; 2011 Mar; 18(3):782-91. PubMed ID: 20960065
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Radiotherapy doses at special reference points correlate with the outcome of cervical cancer therapy.
Yoshimura R; Hayashi K; Ayukawa F; Toda K; Iwata M; Oota S; Hoshi A; Wakatsuki M; Kurosaki H; Okazaki A; Shibuya H
Brachytherapy; 2008; 7(3):260-6. PubMed ID: 18579445
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [Modern principles of the combined radiation treatment of cervical cancer].
Vishnevskaia EE
Med Radiol (Mosk); 1985 Sep; 30(9):63-8. PubMed ID: 3930913
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Treatment results of high-dose-rate remote afterloading brachytherapy for cervical cancer and retrospective comparison of two regimens.
Wong FC; Tung SY; Leung TW; Sze WK; Wong VY; Lui CM; Yuen KK; O SK
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2003 Apr; 55(5):1254-64. PubMed ID: 12654435
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Radiotherapy of Cervical Cancer.
Vordermark D
Oncol Res Treat; 2016; 39(9):516-20. PubMed ID: 27614991
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [Radiotherapy of cervix and endometrial carcinoma].
Barillot I; Haie-Méder C; Charra Brunaud C; Peignaux K; Kerr C; Thomas L
Cancer Radiother; 2016 Sep; 20 Suppl():S189-95. PubMed ID: 27523423
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [Importance of the TDF factor in planning the combined radiation therapy of cervical cancer and the assessment of complications].
Kostromina KN; Fadeeva MA
Med Radiol (Mosk); 1980 Jun; 25(6):57-63. PubMed ID: 7392836
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. The prediction of late rectal complications in patients treated with high dose-rate brachytherapy for carcinoma of the cervix.
Clark BG; Souhami L; Roman TN; Chappell R; Evans MD; Fowler JF
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 1997 Jul; 38(5):989-93. PubMed ID: 9276363
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Late radiation effects to the rectum and bladder in gynecologic cancer patients: the comparison of LENT/SOMA and RTOG/EORTC late-effects scoring systems.
Anacak Y; Yalman D; Ozsaran Z; Haydaroğlu A
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2001 Aug; 50(5):1107-12. PubMed ID: 11483319
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. High dose rate brachytherapy for carcinoma of the cervix: risk factors for late rectal complications.
Uno T; Itami J; Aruga M; Kotaka K; Fujimoto H; Sato T; Minoura S; Ito H
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 1998 Feb; 40(3):615-21. PubMed ID: 9486611
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Carcinoma of the cervical stump.
Petersen LK; Mamsen A; Jakobsen A
Gynecol Oncol; 1992 Aug; 46(2):199-202. PubMed ID: 1500023
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [Post-radiation pelvic disease and ureteral stenosis: physiopathology and evolution in the patient treated for cervical carcinoma. Review of the literature and experience of the Radium Institute].
Buglione M; Toninelli M; Pietta N; Ambrosi E; Filippini M; De Stefani A; Vitali E; De Tomasi D; Bertoni F; Caraffini B; Magrini SM
Arch Ital Urol Androl; 2002 Mar; 74(1):6-11. PubMed ID: 12053453
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [The results of combined radiation therapy of stage-IB cervical cancer depending on the method of intracavity gamma therapy].
Vishnevskaia EE; Okeanova NI; Savkova NV
Med Radiol (Mosk); 1989 Feb; 34(2):61-6. PubMed ID: 2918832
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. High-dose-rate brachytherapy in the treatment of uterine cervix cancer. Analysis of dose effectiveness and late complications.
Ferrigno R; dos Santos Novaes PE; Pellizzon AC; Maia MA; Fogarolli RC; Gentil AC; Salvajoli JV
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2001 Aug; 50(5):1123-35. PubMed ID: 11483321
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
