These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

93 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8083429)

  • 1. Adjustment for heterogeneous variance in genetic evaluations for conformation of United States Holsteins.
    Weigel KA; Lawlor TJ
    J Dairy Sci; 1994 Jun; 77(6):1691-701. PubMed ID: 8083429
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Method and effect of adjustment for heterogeneous variance of Holstein conformation traits.
    Koots KR; Wade KM; Kennedy BW; Dekkers JC; Smith GC; Burnside EB
    J Dairy Sci; 1994 Jan; 77(1):294-302. PubMed ID: 8120198
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Method and effect of adjustment for heterogeneous variance.
    Wiggans GR; VanRaden PM
    J Dairy Sci; 1991 Dec; 74(12):4350-7. PubMed ID: 1787204
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Accounting for heterogeneous variances in multitrait evaluation of Jersey type traits.
    Gengler N; Wiggans GR; Thornton LL; Wright JR; Druet T
    J Dairy Sci; 2006 Aug; 89(8):3143-51. PubMed ID: 16840631
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Estimation of heterogeneous within-herd variance components using empirical Bayes methods: a simulation study.
    Weigel KA; Gianola D
    J Dairy Sci; 1992 Oct; 75(10):2824-33. PubMed ID: 1430486
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Effectiveness of adjusting for heterogeneity of variance in genetic evaluation of Japanese Black cattle.
    Nakaoka H; Narita A; Ibi T; Sasae Y; Miyake T; Yamada T; Sasaki Y
    J Anim Sci; 2007 Oct; 85(10):2429-36. PubMed ID: 17565062
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Application of an autoregressive process to estimate genetic parameters and breeding values for daily milk yield in a tropical herd of Lucerna cattle and in United States Holstein herds.
    Carvalheira JG; Blake RW; Pollak EJ; Quaas RL; Duran-Castro CV
    J Dairy Sci; 1998 Oct; 81(10):2738-51. PubMed ID: 9812279
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Impact of maturity rate of daughters on genetic ranking of Holstein bulls.
    Norman HD; Wright JR; Powell RL; Vanraden PM
    J Dairy Sci; 2005 Sep; 88(9):3337-45. PubMed ID: 16107424
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The genomic evaluation system in the United States: past, present, future.
    Wiggans GR; Vanraden PM; Cooper TA
    J Dairy Sci; 2011 Jun; 94(6):3202-11. PubMed ID: 21605789
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Genetic analysis of Holstein cattle populations in Brazil and the United States.
    Costa CN; Blake RW; Pollak EJ; Oltenacu PA; Quaas RL; Searle SR
    J Dairy Sci; 2000 Dec; 83(12):2963-74. PubMed ID: 11132868
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Invited review: Genomic selection in dairy cattle: progress and challenges.
    Hayes BJ; Bowman PJ; Chamberlain AJ; Goddard ME
    J Dairy Sci; 2009 Feb; 92(2):433-43. PubMed ID: 19164653
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Variance components for test-day milk, fat, and protein yield, and somatic cell score for analyzing management information.
    Caccamo M; Veerkamp RF; de Jong G; Pool MH; Petriglieri R; Licitra G
    J Dairy Sci; 2008 Aug; 91(8):3268-76. PubMed ID: 18650304
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Effect of variance of interaction effects of sire and herd on selection for milk and fat yield.
    Dimov G; Keown JF; Van Vleck LD; Norman HD
    J Dairy Sci; 1996 Jan; 79(1):140-4. PubMed ID: 8675777
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Estimated heterogeneity of phenotypic variance of test-day yield with a structural variance model.
    Gengler N; Wiggans GR; Gillon A
    J Dairy Sci; 2004 Jun; 87(6):1908-16. PubMed ID: 15453508
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Within-herd heritability estimated with daughter-parent regression for yield and somatic cell score.
    Dechow CD; Norman HD
    J Dairy Sci; 2007 Jan; 90(1):482-92. PubMed ID: 17183117
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Effect of sampling status and adjustment for heterogeneous variance on bias in bull evaluations.
    Powell RL; Wiggans GR; Norman HD
    J Dairy Sci; 1994 Mar; 77(3):883-90. PubMed ID: 8169296
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Variance of interaction effects of sire and herd for yield traits of Holsteins in California, New York, and Pennsylvania with an animal model.
    Dimov G; Albuquerque LG; Keown JF; Van Vleck LD; Norman HD
    J Dairy Sci; 1995 Apr; 78(4):939-46. PubMed ID: 7790587
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Stillbirth (co)variance components for a sire-maternal grandsire threshold model and development of a calving ability index for sire selection.
    Cole JB; Wiggans GR; VanRaden PM; Miller RH
    J Dairy Sci; 2007 May; 90(5):2489-96. PubMed ID: 17430953
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Genetic analysis of somatic cell scores in US Holsteins with a Bayesian mixture model.
    Boettcher PJ; Caraviello D; Gianola D
    J Dairy Sci; 2007 Jan; 90(1):435-4. PubMed ID: 17183112
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Genetic variation in lactation means of somatic cell scores for six breeds of dairy cattle.
    Schutz MM; Vanraden PM; Wiggans GR
    J Dairy Sci; 1994 Jan; 77(1):284-93. PubMed ID: 8120197
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.