These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
2. Dependence by any other name smells just as sweet: reply to van der Velde and van der Heijden (1997). Johnston JC; Ruthruff E; Monheit M J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1997 Dec; 23(6):1813-8. PubMed ID: 9425683 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. On the statistical independence of color and shape in object identification. van der Velde F; van der Heijden AH J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1997 Dec; 23(6):1798-812. PubMed ID: 9425682 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Spatiotemporal object history affects the selection of task-relevant properties. Schreij D; Olivers CN J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2013 Feb; 39(1):216-32. PubMed ID: 22390295 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Visual selection of features and objects: is location special? A reinterpretation of Nissen's (1985) findings. Bundesen C Percept Psychophys; 1991 Jul; 50(1):87-9. PubMed ID: 1881770 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Neural mechanisms of spatial- and feature-based attention: a quantitative analysis. Stoppel CM; Boehler CN; Sabelhaus C; Heinze HJ; Hopf JM; Schoenfeld MA Brain Res; 2007 Nov; 1181():51-60. PubMed ID: 17961522 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The fate of object features during perisaccadic mislocalization. Lappe M; Kuhlmann S; Oerke B; Kaiser M J Vis; 2006 Nov; 6(11):1282-93. PubMed ID: 17209735 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Attentional spreading in object-based attention. Richard AM; Lee H; Vecera SP J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2008 Aug; 34(4):842-53. PubMed ID: 18665730 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Processing multidimensional objects under different perceptual loads: the priority of bottom-up perceptual saliency. Wei P; Zhou X Brain Res; 2006 Oct; 1114(1):113-24. PubMed ID: 16935270 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The roles of scene gist and spatial dependency among objects in the semantic guidance of attention in real-world scenes. Wu CC; Wang HC; Pomplun M Vision Res; 2014 Dec; 105():10-20. PubMed ID: 25199610 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A Stroop effect for spatial orientation. Wühr P J Gen Psychol; 2007 Jul; 134(3):285-94. PubMed ID: 17824399 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Overt attention in natural scenes: objects dominate features. Stoll J; Thrun M; Nuthmann A; Einhäuser W Vision Res; 2015 Feb; 107():36-48. PubMed ID: 25478891 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Mobile computation: spatiotemporal integration of the properties of objects in motion. Cavanagh P; Holcombe AO; Chou W J Vis; 2008 Sep; 8(12):1.1-23. PubMed ID: 18831615 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Subthreshold features of visual objects: unseen but not unbound. Melcher D; Vidnyánszky Z Vision Res; 2006 Jun; 46(12):1863-7. PubMed ID: 16414096 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Object-based warping: an illusory distortion of space within objects. Vickery TJ; Chun MM Psychol Sci; 2010 Dec; 21(12):1759-64. PubMed ID: 21068342 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]