BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

367 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8083779)

  • 1. Education and counseling for Norplant users.
    Hinkle LT
    J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs; 1994 Jun; 23(5):387-91. PubMed ID: 8083779
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Subdermal contraceptive implants in nurse-midwifery practice.
    Emerling JM; Paluzzi P; Leiva J; Cullins VE
    J Nurse Midwifery; 1993; 38(2 Suppl):80S-87S. PubMed ID: 8483013
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Levonorgestrel implant use among adolescents.
    Mashburn M
    J Pediatr Health Care; 1994; 8(6):255-60. PubMed ID: 7799199
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. New concepts in contraception: Norplant subdermal implant.
    Lynn MM; Holdcroft C
    Nurse Pract; 1992 Mar; 17(3):85-9. PubMed ID: 1565306
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Norplant: what health educators need to know.
    Ogletree RJ; Welshimer KJ
    J Health Educ; 1994; 25(4):230-3. PubMed ID: 12288963
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Preliminary experience with Norplant in an inner city population.
    Cullins VE; Blumenthal PD; Remsburg RE; Huggins GR
    Contraception; 1993 Feb; 47(2):193-203. PubMed ID: 8449019
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Innovations in contraception: the Norplant system.
    Klaisle CM; Wysocki S
    NAACOGS Clin Issu Perinat Womens Health Nurs; 1992; 3(2):267-79. PubMed ID: 1596435
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A five-year clinical evaluation of Norplant contraceptive subdermal implants in Bangladeshi acceptors.
    Akhter H; Dunson TR; Amatya RN; Begum K; Chowdhury T; Dighe N; Krueger SL; Rahman S
    Contraception; 1993 Jun; 47(6):569-82. PubMed ID: 8334891
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Experience with side effects and health risks associated with Norplant implant use in adolescents.
    Rosenthal SL; Biro FM; Kollar LM; Hillard PJ; Rauh JL
    Contraception; 1995 Nov; 52(5):283-5. PubMed ID: 8585884
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Factors associated with elective Norplant removal in black and white women.
    Opara JU; Ernst FA; Gaskin H; Smith L; Nevels HV
    J Natl Med Assoc; 1997 Apr; 89(4):237-40. PubMed ID: 9145628
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. IMAP statement on Norplant subdermal contraceptive implant system.
    International Planned Parenthood Federation IPPF. International Medical Advisory Panel IMAP
    IPPF Med Bull; 1993 Apr; 27(2):1-3. PubMed ID: 12345306
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Norplant-2 subdermal contraceptive system: experience in Taiwan.
    Lee TY; Yang YS; Tseng LH; Ko TM; Hsu MC; Chuang SM
    J Formos Med Assoc; 1993 May; 92(5):446-50. PubMed ID: 8104598
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Effectiveness of Norplant implants among Thai women in Bangkok.
    Chompootaweep S; Kochagarn E; Sirisumpan S; Tang-usaha J; Theppitaksak B; Dusitsin N
    Contraception; 1996 Jan; 53(1):33-6. PubMed ID: 8631187
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Assessing the acceptability of Norplant contraceptive in four patient populations.
    Dugoff L; Jones OW; Allen-Davis J; Hurst BS; Schlaff WD
    Contraception; 1995 Jul; 52(1):45-9. PubMed ID: 8521714
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Irregular bleeding, body mass index and coital frequency in Norplant contraceptive users.
    Pasquale SA; Knuppel RA; Owens AG; Bachmann GA
    Contraception; 1994 Aug; 50(2):109-16. PubMed ID: 7956210
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The performance of levonorgestrel rod and Norplant contraceptive implants: a 5 year randomized study.
    Sivin I; Campodonico I; Kiriwat O; Holma P; Diaz S; Wan L; Biswas A; Viegas O; el din Abdalla K; Anant MP; Pavez M; Stern J
    Hum Reprod; 1998 Dec; 13(12):3371-8. PubMed ID: 9886517
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Characteristics and experiences of American women electing for early removal of contraceptive implants.
    Frank ML; Ditmore JR; Ilegbodu AE; Bateman L; Poindexter AN
    Contraception; 1995 Sep; 52(3):159-65. PubMed ID: 7587187
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Continuation rates of long-acting methods of contraception. A comparative study of Norplant implants and intrauterine devices.
    Fleming D; Davie J; Glasier A
    Contraception; 1998 Jan; 57(1):19-21. PubMed ID: 9554246
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Hormonal implants: contraception for a new century.
    Darney PD
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1994 May; 170(5 Pt 2):1536-43. PubMed ID: 8178903
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Metabolic parameter, bleeding, and weight changes in U.S. women using progestin only contraceptives.
    Mainwaring R; Hales HA; Stevenson K; Hatasaka HH; Poulson AM; Jones KP; Peterson CM
    Contraception; 1995 Mar; 51(3):149-53. PubMed ID: 7621683
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 19.