These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

156 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8083843)

  • 61. [Study on porcelain veneer restorations. 2. Influence of hydrofluoric acid on bonding strength at the porcelain-resin interface].
    Gomi A; Ikeda M; Takeuchi N; Ban Y; Kamiya K; Kanamori K; Asai T; Senda A
    Aichi Gakuin Daigaku Shigakkai Shi; 1990 Jun; 28(2):619-30. PubMed ID: 2135131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 62. Shear bond strength of composite resin to porcelain.
    Sorensen JA; Engelman MJ; Torres TJ; Avera SP
    Int J Prosthodont; 1991; 4(1):17-23. PubMed ID: 2012666
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 63. Effect of silane pretreatment on the immediate bonding of universal adhesives to computer-aided design/computer-aided manufacturing lithium disilicate glass ceramics.
    Yao C; Zhou L; Yang H; Wang Y; Sun H; Guo J; Huang C
    Eur J Oral Sci; 2017 Apr; 125(2):173-180. PubMed ID: 28233438
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 64. Effect of composite surface treatment and aging on the bond strength between a core build-up composite and a luting agent.
    Cotes C; Cardoso M; Melo RM; Valandro LF; Bottino MA
    J Appl Oral Sci; 2015; 23(1):71-8. PubMed ID: 25760269
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 65. Bond strength of the porcelain repair system to all-ceramic copings and porcelain.
    Lee SJ; Cheong CW; Wright RF; Chang BM
    J Prosthodont; 2014 Feb; 23(2):112-6. PubMed ID: 23725343
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 66. Shear strength of the composite bond to etched porcelain.
    Stangel I; Nathanson D; Hsu CS
    J Dent Res; 1987 Sep; 66(9):1460-5. PubMed ID: 3305639
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 67. Bonding between resin luting cement and glass infiltrated alumina-reinforced ceramics with silane coupling agent.
    Nakamura S; Yoshida K; Kamada K; Atsuta M
    J Oral Rehabil; 2004 Aug; 31(8):785-9. PubMed ID: 15265215
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 68. Tensile bond strength of composite repairs on Artglass using different surface treatments.
    Cesar PF; Meyer Faara PM; Miwa Caldart R; Gastaldoni Jaeger R; da Cunha Ribeiro F
    Am J Dent; 2001 Dec; 14(6):373-7. PubMed ID: 11949797
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 69. Shear bond strengths of two luting cements to laboratory-cured prosthetic resin composite.
    Yoshida K; Greener EH; Lautenschlager EP
    Am J Dent; 1993 Feb; 6(1):13-6. PubMed ID: 8329155
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 70. Effect of different etching periods on the bond strength of a composite resin to a machinable porcelain.
    Chen JH; Matsumura H; Atsuta M
    J Dent; 1998 Jan; 26(1):53-8. PubMed ID: 9479926
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 71. Adhesion between glass fiber posts and resin cement: evaluation of bond strength after various pre-treatments.
    Sipahi C; Piskin B; Akin GE; Bektas OO; Akin H
    Acta Odontol Scand; 2014 Oct; 72(7):509-15. PubMed ID: 24432787
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 72. To silanate or not to silanate: making a clinical decision.
    Barghi N
    Compend Contin Educ Dent; 2000 Aug; 21(8):659-62, 664; quiz 666. PubMed ID: 11199656
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 73. [Study on the porcelain veneer restoration. 3. Effect of various treatments of porcelain surface on the bonding strength at porcelain-resin interface].
    Kondo M; Ikeda M; Takeuchi N; Kanamori K; Kamiya K; Gomi A; Asai T; Senda A
    Aichi Gakuin Daigaku Shigakkai Shi; 1990 Jun; 28(2):631-8. PubMed ID: 2135132
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 74. Pilot study on the early shear strength of porcelain-dentin bonding using dual-cure cements.
    Braga RR; Ballester RY; Carrilho MR
    J Prosthet Dent; 1999 Mar; 81(3):285-9. PubMed ID: 10050115
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 75. Influence of different surface treatments on the short-term bond strength and durability between a zirconia post and a composite resin core material.
    Akgungor G; Sen D; Aydin M
    J Prosthet Dent; 2008 May; 99(5):388-99. PubMed ID: 18456050
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 76. Effect of ceramic surface treatment on tensile bond strength to a resin cement.
    Della Bona A; Anusavice KJ; Hood JA
    Int J Prosthodont; 2002; 15(3):248-53. PubMed ID: 12066487
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 77. Effect of combinations of surface treatments and bonding agents on the bond strength of repaired composites.
    Brosh T; Pilo R; Bichacho N; Blutstein R
    J Prosthet Dent; 1997 Feb; 77(2):122-6. PubMed ID: 9051597
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 78. The effect of different surface treatments on the shear bond strength of luting cements to titanium.
    Abi-Rached Fde O; Fonseca RG; Haneda IG; de Almeida-Júnior AA; Adabo GL
    J Prosthet Dent; 2012 Dec; 108(6):370-6. PubMed ID: 23217469
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 79. Comparison of composite resin-to-porcelain bond strength with three adhesives.
    Kelsey WP; Latta MA; Stanislav CM; Shaddy RS
    Gen Dent; 2000; 48(4):418-21. PubMed ID: 11199616
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 80. Regional bond strengths of a dual-cure resin core material to translucent quartz fiber post.
    Aksornmuang J; Nakajima M; Foxton RM; Tagami J
    Am J Dent; 2006 Feb; 19(1):51-5. PubMed ID: 16562347
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.