These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

132 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8084329)

  • 1. Supreme Court decision threatens patient advocacy.
    Fulwider K
    Mo Nurse; 1994; 63(4):12-3. PubMed ID: 8084329
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The legal obligations of nurses an R.N- lawyer analyzes ethical dilemma.
    Greenlaw J
    Todays Nurs Home; 1980; 1(3):8-9, 12-6. PubMed ID: 10248786
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Supreme Court decision penalizes independent judgment. As I see it.
    Cornu-Quinn C
    Am Nurse; 1994; 26(7):5, 28. PubMed ID: 8067641
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The environment of nursing care.
    Castledine G
    Br J Nurs; 2006 Jul 13-27; 15(13):715. PubMed ID: 16926721
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Patient protection puts nurses at risk.
    Vere-Jones E
    Nurs Times; 2006 Aug 22-28; 102(34):11. PubMed ID: 16956069
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. U.S. Supreme Court decision of N.L.R.B. v. Health Care & Retirement Corporation of America.
    Pendergast J; Wagner B
    Stat; 1994 Jul; 63(13):1-2. PubMed ID: 8029822
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Supreme Court decision questions employment status of nurses.
    N J Nurse; 1995; 25(1):5. PubMed ID: 7731785
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Employers use Supreme Court decision against RNs; ANA devises legal, legislative strategies.
    Ketter J
    Am Nurse; 1994 Oct; 26(9):1, 7. PubMed ID: 7985865
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Texas Supreme Court upholds "whistle blower" protections.
    Willmann J
    Tex Nurs; 1998; 72(6):6-7. PubMed ID: 10603925
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Supreme Court rules NLRB erred re "supervisory nurses".
    Tammelleo AD
    Regan Rep Nurs Law; 1994 Jul; 35(2):1. PubMed ID: 8066179
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Nursing practice implications of court decision.
    Oreg Nurse; 1994 Dec; 59(4):suppl E1. PubMed ID: 7724201
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Protecting the whistle blower.
    Wallis L
    Nurs Stand; 1999 Aug 11-17; 13(47):16-7. PubMed ID: 10661182
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Opinion exchange: how much can you promise a patient?
    Oberle JC
    RN (For Managers); 1982 Oct; 45(12):73-8. PubMed ID: 6921849
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Wronged rights in nursing homes.
    Cushing M
    Am J Nurs; 1984 Oct; 84(10):1213, 1216, 1218. PubMed ID: 6148893
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Conflicting orientations to patient advocacy in long-term care.
    Litwin H; Kaye LW; Monk A
    Gerontologist; 1984 Jun; 24(3):275-9. PubMed ID: 6430754
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. RN advocate and the law.
    Creighton H
    Nurs Manage; 1984 Dec; 15(12):14-7. PubMed ID: 6569395
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Nursing home regulation.
    Butler J
    Nebr Med J; 1990 Nov; 75(11):297-8. PubMed ID: 2124332
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The nursing home resident: some legal considerations.
    Timmreck TC
    J Long Term Care Adm; 1983; 11(2):9-13. PubMed ID: 10261046
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Privacy and confidentiality.
    Hirsh HL
    Nurs Homes; 1982; 31(2):30, 32. PubMed ID: 10283866
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Restraints and the law.
    May K
    Nurs Homes Sr Citiz Care; 1989 Oct; 38(1-2):8-9. PubMed ID: 10296001
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.