These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
3. [Ceramic inlays and onlays]. van Pelt AW; de Kloet HJ; van der Kuy P Ned Tijdschr Tandheelkd; 1996 Nov; 103(11):472-6. PubMed ID: 11921995 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Ceramic inlays: a case presentation and lessons learned from the literature. Boushell LW; Ritter AV J Esthet Restor Dent; 2009; 21(2):77-87. PubMed ID: 19368595 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. In vitro evaluation of push-out bond strength of direct ceramic inlays to tooth surface with fiber-reinforced composite at the interface. Cekic I; Ergun G; Uctasli S; Lassila LV J Prosthet Dent; 2007 May; 97(5):271-8. PubMed ID: 17547945 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A 3-year study of inlays milled from machinable ceramic blocks representing 2 different inlay systems. Thordrup M; Isidor F; Hörsted-Bindslev P Quintessence Int; 1999 Dec; 30(12):829-36. PubMed ID: 10765860 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Copy milling ceramic inlays from resin analogs: a practicable approach with the CELAY system. Eidenbenz S; Lehner CR; Schärer P Int J Prosthodont; 1994; 7(2):134-42. PubMed ID: 8003193 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Conservative indirect restorations for posterior teeth. Cast versus bonded ceramic. Donovan TE; Chee WW Dent Clin North Am; 1993 Jul; 37(3):433-43. PubMed ID: 8348996 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Longevity of 2328 chairside Cerec inlays and onlays. Posselt A; Kerschbaum T Int J Comput Dent; 2003 Jul; 6(3):231-48. PubMed ID: 14601187 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [The use of modern ceramics for inlays and onlays]. Dumfahrt H; Schäffer H; Manhartsberger C Z Stomatol; 1989 Jun; 86(4):223-32. PubMed ID: 2700408 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Long-term clinical results of chairside Cerec CAD/CAM inlays and onlays: a case series. Otto T; Schneider D Int J Prosthodont; 2008; 21(1):53-9. PubMed ID: 18350948 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The CELAY system: a comparison of the fit of direct and indirect fabrication techniques. Siervo S; Bandettini B; Siervo P; Falleni A; Siervo R Int J Prosthodont; 1994; 7(5):434-39. PubMed ID: 7802911 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Preparation design and considerations for direct posterior composite inlay/onlay restoration. Fligor J Pract Proced Aesthet Dent; 2008 Aug; 20(7):413-9; quiz 420, 432. PubMed ID: 18807449 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Esthetic posterior restorations utilizing the double-inlay technique: a novel approach in esthetic dentistry. Hannig M; Schmeiser R Quintessence Int; 1997 Feb; 28(2):79-83. PubMed ID: 10332359 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Dentin bond strengths of two ceramic inlay systems after cementation with three different techniques and one bonding system. Ozturk N; Aykent F J Prosthet Dent; 2003 Mar; 89(3):275-81. PubMed ID: 12644803 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Preparations for Cerec inlays, onlays, and partial crowns. Hansen S Int J Comput Dent; 1999 Oct; 2(4):299-309. PubMed ID: 11373734 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Marginal fit and short-term clinical performance of porcelain-veneered CICERO, CEREC, and Procera onlays. Denissen H; Dozić A; van der Zel J; van Waas M J Prosthet Dent; 2000 Nov; 84(5):506-13. PubMed ID: 11105006 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]