These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

187 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8085030)

  • 1. Empirically derived consequences: a data-based method for prescribing treatments for destructive behavior.
    Fisher W; Piazza CC; Bowman LG; Hagopian LP; Langdon NA
    Res Dev Disabil; 1994; 15(2):133-49. PubMed ID: 8085030
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. On the establishing and reinforcing effects of termination of demands for destructive behavior maintained by positive and negative reinforcement.
    Piazza CC; Hanley GP; Fisher WW; Ruyter JM; Gulotta CS
    Res Dev Disabil; 1998; 19(5):395-407. PubMed ID: 9770252
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A brief method for conducting a negative-reinforcement assessment.
    Zarcone JR; Crosland K; Fisher WW; Worsdell AS; Herman K
    Res Dev Disabil; 1999; 20(2):107-24. PubMed ID: 10198942
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A preliminary procedure for predicting the positive and negative effects of reinforcement-based procedures.
    Piazza CC; Fisher WW; Hanley GP; Hilker K; Derby KM
    J Appl Behav Anal; 1996; 29(2):137-52. PubMed ID: 8682733
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Re-evaluation of constant versus varied punishers using empirically derived consequences.
    Toole LM; DeLeon IG; Kahng S; Ruffin GE; Pletcher CA; Bowman LG
    Res Dev Disabil; 2004; 25(6):577-86. PubMed ID: 15541633
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Facilitating tolerance of delayed reinforcement during functional communication training.
    Fisher WW; Thompson RH; Hagopian LP; Bowman LG; Krug A
    Behav Modif; 2000 Jan; 24(1):3-29. PubMed ID: 10641365
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Further examination of factors that influence preference for positive versus negative reinforcement.
    Kodak T; Lerman DC; Volkert VM; Trosclair N
    J Appl Behav Anal; 2007; 40(1):25-44. PubMed ID: 17471792
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Evaluating self-control and impulsivity in children with severe behavior disorders.
    Vollmer TR; Borrero JC; Lalli JS; Daniel D
    J Appl Behav Anal; 1999; 32(4):451-66. PubMed ID: 10641300
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Decreasing excessive functional communication responses while treating destructive behavior using response restriction.
    Fisher WW; Greer BD; Querim AC; DeRosa N
    Res Dev Disabil; 2014 Nov; 35(11):2614-23. PubMed ID: 25036315
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Extinction and DRO in the treatment of aggression in a boy with severe mental retardation.
    Figueroa RG; Thyer BA; Thyer KB
    J Behav Ther Exp Psychiatry; 1992 Jun; 23(2):133-40. PubMed ID: 1460100
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The effects of noncontingent delivery of high- and low-preference stimuli on attention-maintained destructive behavior.
    Fisher WW; O'Connor JT; Kurtz PF; DeLeon IG; Gotjen DL
    J Appl Behav Anal; 2000; 33(1):79-83. PubMed ID: 10738954
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Developing a technology for the use of operant extinction in clinical settings: an examination of basic and applied research.
    Lerman DC; Iwata BA
    J Appl Behav Anal; 1996; 29(3):345-82; discussion 383-5. PubMed ID: 8926226
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Noncontingent reinforcement as treatment for severe problem behavior: some procedural variations.
    Lalli JS; Casey SD; Kates K
    J Appl Behav Anal; 1997; 30(1):127-36; quiz 136-7. PubMed ID: 9103988
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Concurrent reinforcement schedules: behavior change and maintenance without extinction.
    Hoch H; McComas JJ; Thompson AL; Paone D
    J Appl Behav Anal; 2002; 35(2):155-69. PubMed ID: 12102135
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Reducing escape behavior and increasing task completion with functional communication training, extinction, and response chaining.
    Lalli JS; Casey S; Kates K
    J Appl Behav Anal; 1995; 28(3):261-8. PubMed ID: 7592143
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Behavioral intervention for problem behavior in children with fragile X syndrome.
    Moskowitz LJ; Carr EG; Durand VM
    Am J Intellect Dev Disabil; 2011 Nov; 116(6):457-78. PubMed ID: 22126659
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. An evaluation of the properties of attention as reinforcement for destructive and appropriate behavior.
    Piazza CC; Bowman LG; Contrucci SA; Delia MD; Adelinis JD; Goh HL
    J Appl Behav Anal; 1999; 32(4):437-49. PubMed ID: 10641299
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The effect of reinforcer preference on functional analysis outcomes.
    Lalli JS; Kates K
    J Appl Behav Anal; 1998; 31(1):79-90. PubMed ID: 9532752
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Time-based lag sequential analysis and the functional assessment of challenging behaviour.
    Emerson E; Reeves D; Thompson S; Henderson D; Robertson J; Howard D
    J Intellect Disabil Res; 1996 Jun; 40 ( Pt 3)():260-74. PubMed ID: 8809667
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The treatment of severe behavior problems in school settings using a technical assistance model.
    Northup J; Wacker DP; Berg WK; Kelly L; Sasso G; DeRaad A
    J Appl Behav Anal; 1994; 27(1):33-47. PubMed ID: 8188562
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.