These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

169 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8085292)

  • 1. Frequency response of PVDF needle-type hydrophones.
    Fay B; Ludwig G; Lankjaer C; Lewin PA
    Ultrasound Med Biol; 1994; 20(4):361-6. PubMed ID: 8085292
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Voltage sensitivity response of ultrasonic hydrophones in the frequency range 0.25-2.5 MHz.
    Lewin PA; Bautista R; Devaraju V
    Ultrasound Med Biol; 1999 Sep; 25(7):1131-7. PubMed ID: 10574344
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Thermoacoustic sensor for ultrasound power measurements and ultrasonic equipment calibration.
    Fay B; Rinker M; Lewin PA
    Ultrasound Med Biol; 1994; 20(4):367-73. PubMed ID: 8085293
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Are hydrophones of diameter 0.5 mm small enough to characterise diagnostic ultrasound equipment?
    Smith RA
    Phys Med Biol; 1989 Nov; 34(11):1593-607. PubMed ID: 2685834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Sensitivity of ultrasonic hydrophone probes below 1 MHz.
    Lewin PA; Lypacewicz G; Bautista R; Devaraju V
    Ultrasonics; 2000 Mar; 38(1-8):135-9. PubMed ID: 10829645
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The influence of finite aperture and frequency response of ultrasonic hydrophone probes on the determination of acoustic output.
    Radulescu EG; Lewin PA; Wójcik J; Nowicki A; Berger WA
    Ultrasonics; 2004 Apr; 42(1-9):367-72. PubMed ID: 15047313
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Determination of sensitivity versus frequency characteristics of miniature ultrasonic hydrophones below 1 MHz using planar scanning technique.
    Devaraju V; Lewin PA; Bleeker H
    J Ultrasound Med; 2002 Mar; 21(3):261-8. PubMed ID: 11883536
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Broadband PVDF membrane hydrophone for comparisons of hydrophone calibration methods up to 140 MHz.
    Wilkens V; Molkenstruck W
    IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control; 2007 Sep; 54(9):1784-91. PubMed ID: 17941384
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Calibration of ultrasonic hydrophone probes up to 100 MHz using time gating frequency analysis and finite amplitude waves.
    Radulescu EG; Lewin PA; Wójcik J; Nowicki A
    Ultrasonics; 2003 Jun; 41(4):247-54. PubMed ID: 12782255
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Progress in developing a thermal method for measuring the output power of medical ultrasound transducers that exploits the pyroelectric effect.
    Zeqiri B; Zauhar G; Hodnett M; Barrie J
    Ultrasonics; 2011 May; 51(4):420-4. PubMed ID: 21163509
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Interlaboratory evaluation of hydrophone sensitivity calibration from 0.1 to 2 MHz via time delay spectrometry.
    Harris GR; Gammell PM; Lewin PA; Radulescu EG
    Ultrasonics; 2004 Apr; 42(1-9):349-53. PubMed ID: 15047310
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Improved measurement of acoustic output using complex deconvolution of hydrophone sensitivity.
    Wear KA; Gammell PM; Maruvada S; Liu Y; Harris GR
    IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control; 2014 Jan; 61(1):62-75. PubMed ID: 24402896
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Characterization of ultrasonic transducers using a fiberoptic sensor.
    Wu YQ; Shankar PM; Lewin PA
    Ultrasound Med Biol; 1994; 20(7):645-53. PubMed ID: 7810025
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Membrane hydrophone phase characteristics through nonlinear acoustics measurements.
    Bloomfield PE; Gandhi G; Lewin PA
    IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control; 2011 Nov; 58(11):2418-37. PubMed ID: 22083775
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Narrowband impedance matching layer for high efficiency thickness mode ultrasonic transducers.
    Toda M
    IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control; 2002 Mar; 49(3):299-306. PubMed ID: 12322878
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Fabrication techniques for improving the performance of PVDF-on-silicon ultrasonic transducer arrays.
    Kim HJ; Ziaie B
    Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2006; 2006():3491-4. PubMed ID: 17945781
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Directivity and Frequency-Dependent Effective Sensitive Element Size of Needle Hydrophones: Predictions From Four Theoretical Forms Compared With Measurements.
    Wear KA; Baker C; Miloro P
    IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control; 2018 Oct; 65(10):1781-1788. PubMed ID: 30010557
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A comparison of two calibration methods for ultrasonic hydrophones.
    Gloersen WB; Harris GR; Stewart HF; Lewin PA
    Ultrasound Med Biol; 1982; 8(5):545-8. PubMed ID: 7147468
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Angular response of miniature ultrasonic hydrophones.
    Shombert DG; Smith SW; Harris GR
    Med Phys; 1982; 9(4):484-92. PubMed ID: 7110078
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The design and fabrication of high frequency poly(vinylidene fluoride) transducers.
    Sherar MD; Foster FS
    Ultrason Imaging; 1989 Apr; 11(2):75-94. PubMed ID: 2734975
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.