These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
260 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8085981)
1. Issues in biomedical statistics: statistical inference. Ludbrook J; Dudley H Aust N Z J Surg; 1994 Sep; 64(9):630-6. PubMed ID: 8085981 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Advantages of permutation (randomization) tests in clinical and experimental pharmacology and physiology. Ludbrook J Clin Exp Pharmacol Physiol; 1994 Sep; 21(9):673-86. PubMed ID: 7820947 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Issues in biomedical statistics: comparing means by computer-intensive tests. Ludbrook J Aust N Z J Surg; 1995 Nov; 65(11):812-9. PubMed ID: 7487733 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Inappropriate use of statistical power. Fraser RA Bone Marrow Transplant; 2023 May; 58(5):474-477. PubMed ID: 36869191 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Statistics in ophthalmology revisited: the (effect) size matters. Grzybowski A; Mianowany M Acta Ophthalmol; 2018 Nov; 96(7):e885-e888. PubMed ID: 30187631 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [Principles of tests of hypotheses in statistics: alpha, beta and P]. Riou B; Landais P Ann Fr Anesth Reanim; 1998; 17(9):1168-80. PubMed ID: 9835991 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Interpretation of research data: hypothesis testing. Stolar MH Am J Hosp Pharm; 1980 Nov; 37(11):1539-45. PubMed ID: 7211860 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [Comparison of two or more samples of quantitative data]. Ivanković D; Tiljak MK Acta Med Croatica; 2006; 60 Suppl 1():37-46. PubMed ID: 16526306 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [Popper and the problem of induction in epidemiology]. Banegas JR; Rodríguez Artalejo F; del Rey Calero J Rev Esp Salud Publica; 2000; 74(4):327-39. PubMed ID: 11031841 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Quantile-function based null distribution in resampling based multiple testing. van der Laan MJ; Hubbard AE Stat Appl Genet Mol Biol; 2006; 5():Article14. PubMed ID: 17049025 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Statistical inferences under the Null hypothesis: common mistakes and pitfalls in neuroimaging studies. Hupé JM Front Neurosci; 2015; 9():18. PubMed ID: 25745383 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. P > .05: The incorrect interpretation of "not significant" results is a significant problem. Smith RJ Am J Phys Anthropol; 2020 Aug; 172(4):521-527. PubMed ID: 32570289 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. P value and the theory of hypothesis testing: an explanation for new researchers. Biau DJ; Jolles BM; Porcher R Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2010 Mar; 468(3):885-92. PubMed ID: 19921345 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Why checking model assumptions using null hypothesis significance tests does not suffice: A plea for plausibility. Tijmstra J Psychon Bull Rev; 2018 Apr; 25(2):548-559. PubMed ID: 29476482 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Replicability and randomization test logic in behavior analysis. Jacobs KW J Exp Anal Behav; 2019 Mar; 111(2):329-341. PubMed ID: 30701555 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Random assignment of available cases: bootstrap standard errors and confidence intervals. Lunneborg CE Psychol Methods; 2001 Dec; 6(4):402-12. PubMed ID: 11778680 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Statistics in physiology and pharmacology: a slow and erratic learning curve. Ludbrook J Clin Exp Pharmacol Physiol; 2001; 28(5-6):488-92. PubMed ID: 11428385 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]