These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
117 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8086236)
1. A comparison of single photon and dual X-ray absorptiometry of the forearm in children and adults. Ilich JZ; Hsieh LC; Tzagournis MA; Wright JK; Saracoglu M; Barden HS; Matkovic V Bone; 1994; 15(2):187-91. PubMed ID: 8086236 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Bone densitometry of the forearm: comparison of single-photon and dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry. Eckert P; Casez JP; Thiébaud D; Schnyder P; Burckhardt P Bone; 1996 Jun; 18(6):575-9. PubMed ID: 8805999 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Evaluation of peripheral dual energy X-ray absorptiometry: comparison with single photon absorptiometry of the forearm and dual energy X-ray absorptiometry of the spine or femur. Mole PA; McMurdo ME; Paterson CR Br J Radiol; 1998 Apr; 71(844):427-32. PubMed ID: 9659136 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Measurement of forearm bone mineral density: comparison of precision of five different instruments. Heilmann P; Wüster C; Prolingheuer C; Götz M; Ziegler R Calcif Tissue Int; 1998 May; 62(5):383-7. PubMed ID: 9541514 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison of single-photon and dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry of the radius. Nelson D; Feingold M; Mascha E; Kleerekoper M Bone Miner; 1992 Jul; 18(1):77-83. PubMed ID: 1422300 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Densitometry of the radius using single and dual energy absorptiometry. Faulkner KG; McClung MR; Schmeer MS; Roberts LA; Gaither KW Calcif Tissue Int; 1994 Mar; 54(3):208-11. PubMed ID: 8055368 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry of the forearm: reproducibility and correlation with single-photon absorptiometry. Leboff MS; Fuleihan GE; Angell JE; Chung S; Curtis K J Bone Miner Res; 1992 Jul; 7(7):841-6. PubMed ID: 1642152 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparative assessment of bone mineral density of the forearm using single photon and dual X-ray absorptiometry. Nieves JW; Cosman F; Mars C; Lindsay R Calcif Tissue Int; 1992 Nov; 51(5):352-5. PubMed ID: 1458339 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Dual energy x-ray absorptiometry of the forearm in preterm and term infants: evaluation of the methodology. Sievänen H; Backström MC; Kuusela AL; Ikonen RS; Mäki M Pediatr Res; 1999 Jan; 45(1):100-5. PubMed ID: 9890616 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Dual x-ray absorptiometry forearm software: accuracy and intermachine relationship. Hagiwara S; Engelke K; Yang SO; Dhillon MS; Guglielmi G; Nelson DL; Genant HK J Bone Miner Res; 1994 Sep; 9(9):1425-7. PubMed ID: 7817826 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Differences in bone mineral in young Asian and Caucasian Americans may reflect differences in bone size. Bhudhikanok GS; Wang MC; Eckert K; Matkin C; Marcus R; Bachrach LK J Bone Miner Res; 1996 Oct; 11(10):1545-56. PubMed ID: 8889856 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Single X-ray absorptiometry of the forearm: precision, correlation, and reference data. Kelly TL; Crane G; Baran DT Calcif Tissue Int; 1994 Mar; 54(3):212-8. PubMed ID: 8055369 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparisons of noninvasive bone mineral measurements in assessing age-related loss, fracture discrimination, and diagnostic classification. Grampp S; Genant HK; Mathur A; Lang P; Jergas M; Takada M; Glüer CC; Lu Y; Chavez M J Bone Miner Res; 1997 May; 12(5):697-711. PubMed ID: 9144335 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Impact of reference point selection on DXA-based measurement of forearm bone mineral density. Yu W; Ying Q; Guan W; Lin Q; Zhang Z; Chen J; Engelke K; Hsieh E Arch Osteoporos; 2019 Nov; 14(1):107. PubMed ID: 31707587 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Bone mineral density measured by a portable X-ray device agrees with dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry at forearm in preschool aged children. Hazell TJ; Vanstone CA; Rodd CJ; Rauch F; Weiler HA J Clin Densitom; 2013; 16(3):302-307. PubMed ID: 22898084 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Quantitative computed tomography (QCT) of the forearm using general purpose spiral whole-body CT scanners: accuracy, precision and comparison with dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA). Engelke K; Libanati C; Liu Y; Wang H; Austin M; Fuerst T; Stampa B; Timm W; Genant HK Bone; 2009 Jul; 45(1):110-8. PubMed ID: 19345291 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Assessment of the skeletal status by peripheral quantitative computed tomography of the forearm: short-term precision in vivo and comparison to dual X-ray absorptiometry. Grampp S; Lang P; Jergas M; Glüer CC; Mathur A; Engelke K; Genant HK J Bone Miner Res; 1995 Oct; 10(10):1566-76. PubMed ID: 8686514 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Bone acquisition in healthy children and adolescents: comparisons of dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry and computed tomography measures. Wren TA; Liu X; Pitukcheewanont P; Gilsanz V J Clin Endocrinol Metab; 2005 Apr; 90(4):1925-8. PubMed ID: 15634720 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Single X-ray absorptiometry: performance characteristics and comparison with single photon absorptiometry. Borg J; Møllgaard A; Riis BJ Osteoporos Int; 1995; 5(5):377-81. PubMed ID: 8800788 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. An evaluation of sex and body weight determination from the proximal femur using DXA technology and its potential for forensic anthropology. Wheatley BP Forensic Sci Int; 2005 Jan; 147(2-3):141-5. PubMed ID: 15567618 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]