These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
143 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8086578)
21. Antimicrobial susceptibility testing of anaerobic bacteria: review and update on the role of the National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards. Thornsberry C Rev Infect Dis; 1990; 12 Suppl 2():S218-22. PubMed ID: 2406873 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Antimicrobial resistance and susceptibility testing of anaerobic bacteria. Schuetz AN Clin Infect Dis; 2014 Sep; 59(5):698-705. PubMed ID: 24867792 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. [Study of the sensitivity of anaerobic bacteria using 2 dilution technics]. Tigaud S; Cochat N; Vincent P Pathol Biol (Paris); 1985 Jun; 33(5 Pt 2):573-6. PubMed ID: 3911155 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. [Use of the Etest method for antimicrobial susceptibility testing of obligate anaerobes]. Rokosz A; Sawicka-Grzelak A; Kot K; Meszaros J; Łuczak M Med Dosw Mikrobiol; 2001; 53(2):167-75. PubMed ID: 11757426 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Anaerobic bacteria in postsurgical infections: isolation rate and antimicrobial susceptibility. Di Rosa R; Di Rosa E; Panichi G J Chemother; 1996 Apr; 8(2):91-5. PubMed ID: 8708752 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. In vitro susceptibility testing of nonsporing anaerobes to ten antimicrobial agents. Rao PS; Shivananda PG Indian J Pathol Microbiol; 2000 Apr; 43(2):139-42. PubMed ID: 11217270 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. In vitro susceptibility testing of nonsporing anaerobes to ten antimicrobial agents. Rao PS; Shivananda PG Indian J Pathol Microbiol; 2000 Jul; 43(3):281-4. PubMed ID: 11218673 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Multilaboratory evaluation of an agar diffusion disk susceptibility test for rapidly growing anaerobic bacteria. Barry AL; Fuchs PC; Gerlach EH; Allen SD; Acar JF; Aldridge KE; Bourgault AM; Grimm H; Hall GS; Heizmann W Rev Infect Dis; 1990; 12 Suppl 2():S210-7. PubMed ID: 2406872 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Evaluation of three broth disk methods for testing the susceptibility of anaerobic bacteria to imipenem. Shungu DL; Weinberg E; Cerami AT J Clin Microbiol; 1985 Jun; 21(6):875-9. PubMed ID: 3859487 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. [Sensitivity of anaerobic bacteria to therapeutic agents (Zurich 1984)]. Wüst J; Hardegger U Schweiz Med Wochenschr; 1985 Dec; 115(52):1886-90. PubMed ID: 4089587 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Comparison of Clostridium difficile minimum inhibitory concentrations obtained using agar dilution vs broth microdilution methods. Hastey CJ; Dale SE; Nary J; Citron D; Law JH; Roe-Carpenter DE; Chesnel L Anaerobe; 2017 Apr; 44():73-77. PubMed ID: 28188880 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Evolution of anaerobe susceptibility testing in the United States. Hecht DW Clin Infect Dis; 2002 Sep; 35(Suppl 1):S28-35. PubMed ID: 12173105 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Evaluation of the E test for susceptibility testing of anaerobic bacteria. Citron DM; Ostovari MI; Karlsson A; Goldstein EJ J Clin Microbiol; 1991 Oct; 29(10):2197-203. PubMed ID: 1939571 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]