These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
3. Implications of supervision registers in psychiatry. Pugh R; Gardner J; Allen R BMJ; 1994 Sep; 309(6954):611. PubMed ID: 8086977 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Mental health legislation and decision making capacity: capacity is of more than practical benefit. Murray BJ BMJ; 2006 Jan; 332(7533):119. PubMed ID: 16410597 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Implications of supervision registers in psychiatry. Being on the register will not remove the risk. Davies T BMJ; 1994 Oct; 309(6962):1158-9. PubMed ID: 7987123 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. 'I've got a little list' (Koko: Mikado). But is it any use? Comments on the forensic aspects of 'supervision registers' for the mentally ill. Prins H Med Sci Law; 1995 Jul; 35(3):218-24. PubMed ID: 7651100 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Mental health legislation and decision making capacity: capacity is more complex than it looks. Tan JO; Hope T BMJ; 2006 Jan; 332(7533):119. PubMed ID: 16410598 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Law and mental disorder. Lancet; 1979 Apr; 1(8119):759-61. PubMed ID: 85995 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Mentally ill offenders are being wrongly held in prisons. Stephenson P BMJ; 2004 May; 328(7448):1095. PubMed ID: 15130974 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. The age of risk: risk perception and determination following the Mental Health Act 2007. Glover-Thomas N Med Law Rev; 2011; 19(4):581-605. PubMed ID: 22038745 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Time to act on behalf of mentally disordered offenders. Sales B; McKenzie N BMJ; 2007 Jun; 334(7605):1222. PubMed ID: 17556481 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Who benefits from the new act? Crepaz-Keay D BMJ; 2005 Dec; 331(7530):1470-1. PubMed ID: 16356988 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Mental health law: compulsory treatment in a general medical setting. Linford S Br J Hosp Med (Lond); 2005 Oct; 66(10):569-71. PubMed ID: 16255256 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Protecting the rights of people with mental illness: can we achieve both good legal process and good clinical outcomes? Gray JE; O'Reilly RL; Clements GW Health Law Can; 2002 Nov; 23(2):25-32. PubMed ID: 12528611 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Bournewood: an indefensible gap in mental health law. Law Commission's proposals for incapacity jurisdiction strike reasonable balance. Dickenson D; Shah A BMJ; 1999 Jan; 318(7176):126-7. PubMed ID: 9880300 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. The new Mental Health Act statistics reveal some interesting, if inconvenient, truths. Hewitt D Ment Health Today; 2010 Feb; ():36. PubMed ID: 20201151 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Implications of supervision registers in psychiatry. Most patients in Bow and Poplar would be on the register. Laugharne R BMJ; 1994 Oct; 309(6962):1159. PubMed ID: 7987124 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Human Rights Act 1998 and mental health legislation: implications for the management of mentally ill patients. Leung WC Postgrad Med J; 2002 Mar; 78(917):178-81. PubMed ID: 11884706 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The practice of applying compulsory treatment to mentally disturbed people: a view from Russia. Pishchita A Med Law; 2005 Dec; 24(4):717-25. PubMed ID: 16440866 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. UK rejects compulsory mental health treatment. Meek C CMAJ; 2005 Apr; 172(9):1168. PubMed ID: 15851702 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]