These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

354 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8086953)

  • 1. Rationale for systematic reviews.
    Mulrow CD
    BMJ; 1994 Sep; 309(6954):597-9. PubMed ID: 8086953
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The future of Cochrane Neonatal.
    Soll RF; Ovelman C; McGuire W
    Early Hum Dev; 2020 Nov; 150():105191. PubMed ID: 33036834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Evidence-based medicine, systematic reviews, and guidelines in interventional pain management: part 6. Systematic reviews and meta-analyses of observational studies.
    Manchikanti L; Datta S; Smith HS; Hirsch JA
    Pain Physician; 2009; 12(5):819-50. PubMed ID: 19787009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Systematic reviews and meta-analysis.
    Askie L; Offringa M
    Semin Fetal Neonatal Med; 2015 Dec; 20(6):403-9. PubMed ID: 26515266
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Understanding and Appraising Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis.
    Mittal N; Goyal M; Mittal PK
    J Clin Pediatr Dent; 2017; 41(5):317-326. PubMed ID: 28872991
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Systematic reviews: the good, the bad, and the ugly.
    Yuan Y; Hunt RH
    Am J Gastroenterol; 2009 May; 104(5):1086-92. PubMed ID: 19417748
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Publication bias in dermatology systematic reviews and meta-analyses.
    Atakpo P; Vassar M
    J Dermatol Sci; 2016 May; 82(2):69-74. PubMed ID: 26925817
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Assessing the validity of abbreviated literature searches for rapid reviews: protocol of a non-inferiority and meta-epidemiologic study.
    Nussbaumer-Streit B; Klerings I; Wagner G; Titscher V; Gartlehner G
    Syst Rev; 2016 Nov; 5(1):197. PubMed ID: 27876092
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The Mass Production of Redundant, Misleading, and Conflicted Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses.
    Ioannidis JP
    Milbank Q; 2016 Sep; 94(3):485-514. PubMed ID: 27620683
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Evidence-based medicine, systematic reviews, and guidelines in interventional pain management, part I: introduction and general considerations.
    Manchikanti L
    Pain Physician; 2008; 11(2):161-86. PubMed ID: 18354710
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Effects of home telemonitoring interventions on patients with chronic heart failure: an overview of systematic reviews.
    Kitsiou S; Paré G; Jaana M
    J Med Internet Res; 2015 Mar; 17(3):e63. PubMed ID: 25768664
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Adding up the evidence: systematic reviews and meta-analyses.
    Noordzij M; Zoccali C; Dekker FW; Jager KJ
    Nephron Clin Pract; 2011; 119(4):c310-6. PubMed ID: 22135790
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The Effectiveness of Integrated Care Pathways for Adults and Children in Health Care Settings: A Systematic Review.
    Allen D; Gillen E; Rixson L
    JBI Libr Syst Rev; 2009; 7(3):80-129. PubMed ID: 27820426
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Evidence-based medicine, systematic reviews, and guidelines in interventional pain management: Part 7: systematic reviews and meta-analyses of diagnostic accuracy studies.
    Manchikanti L; Derby R; Wolfer L; Singh V; Datta S; Hirsch JA
    Pain Physician; 2009; 12(6):929-63. PubMed ID: 19935980
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Identifying indicators sensitive to primary healthcare nurse practitioner practice: a review of systematic reviews protocol.
    Kilpatrick K; Tchouaket EN; Chouinard MC; Savard I; Bouabdillah N; Houle J; St-Louis G; Jabbour M; Atallah R
    BMJ Open; 2021 Jan; 11(1):e043213. PubMed ID: 33408211
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Systematic reviews and meta-analyses: when they are useful and when to be careful.
    Noordzij M; Hooft L; Dekker FW; Zoccali C; Jager KJ
    Kidney Int; 2009 Dec; 76(11):1130-6. PubMed ID: 19727062
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Methodologic issues in systematic reviews and meta-analyses.
    Montori VM; Swiontkowski MF; Cook DJ
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2003 Aug; (413):43-54. PubMed ID: 12897595
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Instructions for aggregated evidence: About reviews, systematic reviews and meta-analyses (part 2)].
    Günther J; Briel M; Schindler B
    Med Monatsschr Pharm; 2015 Oct; 38(10):401-8. PubMed ID: 26731858
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Summarizing systematic reviews: methodological development, conduct and reporting of an umbrella review approach.
    Aromataris E; Fernandez R; Godfrey CM; Holly C; Khalil H; Tungpunkom P
    Int J Evid Based Healthc; 2015 Sep; 13(3):132-40. PubMed ID: 26360830
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Consistency and accuracy of indexing systematic review articles and meta-analyses in medline.
    Wilczynski NL; Haynes RB
    Health Info Libr J; 2009 Sep; 26(3):203-10. PubMed ID: 19712212
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 18.