These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

79 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8087483)

  • 1. Calculation of dose conversion factors for posterior-anterior chest radiography of adults with a relatively high-energy X-ray spectrum.
    Schultz FW; Geleijns J; Zoetelief J
    Br J Radiol; 1994 Aug; 67(800):775-85. PubMed ID: 8087483
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A Monte Carlo estimation of effective dose in chest tomosynthesis.
    Sabol JM
    Med Phys; 2009 Dec; 36(12):5480-7. PubMed ID: 20095260
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Incident air kerma to absorbed organ dose conversion factors for breast and lung in PA thorax radiography: The effect of patient thickness and radiation quality.
    Kelaranta A; Toroi P; Vock P
    Phys Med; 2016 Dec; 32(12):1594-1601. PubMed ID: 27914781
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Radiation exposure of children in pediatric radiology. Part 3: Conversion coefficients for reconstruction of organ doses achieved during chest X-ray examinations].
    Seidenbusch MC; Regulla D; Schneider K
    Rofo; 2008 Dec; 180(12):1061-81. PubMed ID: 19235700
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Impact on 141Ce, 144Ce, 95Zr, and 90Sr beta emitter dose coefficients of photon and electron SAFs calculated with ICRP/ICRU reference adult voxel computational phantoms.
    Li WB; Zankl M; Schlattl H; Petoussi-Henss N; Eckerman KF; Bolch WE; Oeh U; Hoeschen C
    Health Phys; 2010 Oct; 99(4):503-10. PubMed ID: 20838091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Increased radiation dose to overweight and obese patients from radiographic examinations.
    Yanch JC; Behrman RH; Hendricks MJ; McCall JH
    Radiology; 2009 Jul; 252(1):128-39. PubMed ID: 19403846
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Estimation and comparison of effective dose (E) in standard chest CT by organ dose measurements and dose-length-product methods and assessment of the influence of CT tube potential (energy dependency) on effective dose in a dual-source CT.
    Paul J; Banckwitz R; Krauss B; Vogl TJ; Maentele W; Bauer RW
    Eur J Radiol; 2012 Apr; 81(4):e507-12. PubMed ID: 21703793
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Estimating effective dose for CT using dose-length product compared with using organ doses: consequences of adopting International Commission on Radiological Protection publication 103 or dual-energy scanning.
    Christner JA; Kofler JM; McCollough CH
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2010 Apr; 194(4):881-9. PubMed ID: 20308486
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Application of the ICRP/ICRU reference computational phantoms to internal dosimetry: calculation of specific absorbed fractions of energy for photons and electrons.
    Hadid L; Desbrée A; Schlattl H; Franck D; Blanchardon E; Zankl M
    Phys Med Biol; 2010 Jul; 55(13):3631-41. PubMed ID: 20526035
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Evaluation of absorbed and effective doses to patients from radiopharmaceuticals using the ICRP 110 reference computational phantoms and ICRP 103 formulation.
    Hadid L; Gardumi A; Desbrée A
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2013 Sep; 156(2):141-59. PubMed ID: 23525914
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Review of Kerma-Area Product and total energy incident on patients in radiography, mammography and CT.
    Yao H; Huda W; Mah E; He W
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2015 Feb; 163(2):251-60. PubMed ID: 24821931
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. 2007 recommendations of the ICRP change basis for estimation of the effective dose: what is the impact on radiation dose assessment of patient and personnel?
    Boetticher Hv; Lachmund J; Looe HK; Hoffmann W; Poppe B
    Rofo; 2008 May; 180(5):391-5. PubMed ID: 18438741
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Estimation of absorbed organ doses and effective dose based on body mass index in digital radiography.
    Kim H; Park M; Park S; Jeong H; Kim J; Kim Y
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2013 Jan; 153(1):92-9. PubMed ID: 22772453
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Fluence to absorbed dose, effective dose and gray equivalent conversion coefficients for iron nuclei from 10 MeV to 1 TeV, calculated using Monte Carlo radiation transport code MCNPX 2.7.A.
    Copeland K; Parker DE; Friedberg W
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2010 Mar; 138(4):353-62. PubMed ID: 19942625
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Selected organ dose conversion coefficients for external photons calculated using ICRP adult voxel phantoms and Monte Carlo code FLUKA.
    Patni HK; Nadar MY; Akar DK; Bhati S; Sarkar PK
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2011 Nov; 147(3):406-16. PubMed ID: 21147784
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Multisection CT protocols: sex- and age-specific conversion factors used to determine effective dose from dose-length product.
    Deak PD; Smal Y; Kalender WA
    Radiology; 2010 Oct; 257(1):158-66. PubMed ID: 20851940
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Factors influencing the absorbed dose in intraoral radiography.
    Kaeppler G; Dietz K; Herz K; Reinert S
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2007 Dec; 36(8):506-13. PubMed ID: 18033949
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. PATIENT RADIATION DOSE FROM CHEST X-RAY EXAMINATIONS IN THE WEST BANK-PALESTINE.
    Lahham A; Issa A; ALMasri H
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2018 Feb; 178(3):298-303. PubMed ID: 28981835
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [The Difference in Backscatter Factors of Diagnostic X-rays by the Difference in the Scattering Medium and in the Objective Dose].
    Kato H; Sakai K; Uchiyama M; Suzuki K
    Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi; 2016; 72(10):1007-1014. PubMed ID: 27760900
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Photon extremity absorbed dose and kerma conversion coefficients for calibration geometries.
    Veinot KG; Hertel NE
    Health Phys; 2007 Feb; 92(2):179-85. PubMed ID: 17220720
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.