These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
42. Ulysses and the psychiatrists: a legal and policy analysis of the voluntary commitment contract. Dresser RS Harv Civ Rights-Civil Lib Law Rev; 1982; 16(3):777-854. PubMed ID: 11659391 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
43. Respecting the autonomy of chronic mentally ill women in decisions about contraception. Coverdale JH; Bayer TL; McCullough LB; Chervenak FA Hosp Community Psychiatry; 1993 Jul; 44(7):671-4. PubMed ID: 8354506 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. National commission proposes numerous new regulations of institutional review boards. Maloney DM Hum Res Rep; 1998 Oct; 13(10):1-2. PubMed ID: 11657739 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
45. Consent and coercion: research with involuntarily treated persons with mental illness or substance abuse. Appelbaum PS Account Res; 1995; 4(1):69-79. PubMed ID: 11654231 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
46. Holy Grail, sliding scale, and refusal as symptom: competency determinations for medical and psychiatric patients. Farr M Pharos Alpha Omega Alpha Honor Med Soc; 1999; 62(2):2-9. PubMed ID: 10414128 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
47. Medical research involving children: some legal and ethical issues. Langer DH Bayl Law Rev; 1984; 36(1):1-39. PubMed ID: 11658558 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
48. Proposed regulations for research involving those institutionalized as mentally infirm: a consideration of their relevance in 1995. Levine RJ Account Res; 1996; 4(3-4):177-86. PubMed ID: 11654513 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
49. Religious issues in the capacity evaluation. Waldfogel S; Meadows S Gen Hosp Psychiatry; 1996 May; 18(3):173-82. PubMed ID: 8739010 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. Treatment decisions for patients without surrogates: rethinking policies for a vulnerable population. Miller TE; Coleman CH; Cugliari AM J Am Geriatr Soc; 1997 Mar; 45(3):369-74. PubMed ID: 9063286 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
54. In harm's way: research subjects who are decisionally impaired. Sundram CJ J Health Care Law Policy; 1998; 1(1):36-65. PubMed ID: 15573429 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
55. Restrict the Recruitment of Involuntarily Committed Patients for Psychiatric Research. Elliott C; Lamkin M JAMA Psychiatry; 2016 Apr; 73(4):317-8. PubMed ID: 26864804 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
56. Preserving personal autonomy for the elderly. Competency, guardianship, and Alzheimer's disease. Rosoff AJ; Gottlieb GL J Leg Med; 1987 Mar; 8(1):1-47. PubMed ID: 3495620 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
57. The ethics of involving psychiatrically impaired persons in research. DeRenzo EG IRB; 1994; 16(6):7-9, 11. PubMed ID: 11659990 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
58. [Compulsory treatment under legal uncertainty: part 1: the current legal situation on compulsory treatment of patients with psychiatric disorders incapable of consenting]. Müller S; Walter H; Kunze H; Konrad N; Heinz A Nervenarzt; 2012 Sep; 83(9):1142-9. PubMed ID: 22911322 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. California's new law allowing surrogate consent for clinical research involving subjects with impaired decision-making capacity. Luce JM Intensive Care Med; 2003 Jun; 29(6):1024-5. PubMed ID: 12861989 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
60. Research with Alzheimer's disease subjects: informed consent and proxy decision making. High DM J Am Geriatr Soc; 1992 Sep; 40(9):950-7. PubMed ID: 1512393 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]