These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
186 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8089070)
1. Prevention of bacterial colonization of intravenous catheters by antiseptic impregnation of polyurethane polymers. Bach A; Böhrer H; Motsch J; Martin E; Geiss HK; Sonntag HG J Antimicrob Chemother; 1994 May; 33(5):969-78. PubMed ID: 8089070 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Prevention of central venous catheter-related bloodstream infection by use of an antiseptic-impregnated catheter. A randomized, controlled trial. Maki DG; Stolz SM; Wheeler S; Mermel LA Ann Intern Med; 1997 Aug; 127(4):257-66. PubMed ID: 9265424 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Retention of antibacterial activity and bacterial colonization of antiseptic-bonded central venous catheters. Bach A; Schmidt H; Böttiger B; Schreiber B; Böhrer H; Motsch J; Martin E; Sonntag HG J Antimicrob Chemother; 1996 Feb; 37(2):315-22. PubMed ID: 8707741 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Efficacy of antiseptic-impregnated catheters on catheter colonization and catheter-related bloodstream infections in patients in an intensive care unit. Osma S; Kahveci SF; Kaya FN; Akalin H; Ozakin C; Yilmaz E; Kutlay O J Hosp Infect; 2006 Feb; 62(2):156-62. PubMed ID: 16307824 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Evaluation of antiseptic-impregnated central venous catheters for prevention of catheter-related infection in intensive care unit patients. Sheng WH; Ko WJ; Wang JT; Chang SC; Hsueh PR; Luh KT Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis; 2000 Sep; 38(1):1-5. PubMed ID: 11025176 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Antiseptic-bonded central venous catheters and bacterial colonisation. Hannan M; Juste RN; Umasanker S; Glendenning A; Nightingale C; Azadian B; Soni N Anaesthesia; 1999 Sep; 54(9):868-72. PubMed ID: 10460558 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Effect of a second-generation venous catheter impregnated with chlorhexidine and silver sulfadiazine on central catheter-related infections: a randomized, controlled trial. Rupp ME; Lisco SJ; Lipsett PA; Perl TM; Keating K; Civetta JM; Mermel LA; Lee D; Dellinger EP; Donahoe M; Giles D; Pfaller MA; Maki DG; Sherertz R Ann Intern Med; 2005 Oct; 143(8):570-80. PubMed ID: 16230723 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Impact of chlorhexidine-silver sulfadiazine-impregnated central venous catheters on in vitro quantitation of catheter-associated bacteria. Schmitt SK; Knapp C; Hall GS; Longworth DL; McMahon JT; Washington JA J Clin Microbiol; 1996 Mar; 34(3):508-11. PubMed ID: 8904403 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. In vitro evaluation of the antibacterial activity of three different central venous catheters against gram-positive bacteria. Yorganci K; Krepel C; Weigelt JA; Edmiston CE Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis; 2002 May; 21(5):379-84. PubMed ID: 12072923 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Decreased bacterial adherence and biofilm formation on chlorhexidine and silver sulfadiazine-impregnated central venous catheters implanted in swine. Greenfeld JI; Sampath L; Popilskis SJ; Brunnert SR; Stylianos S; Modak S Crit Care Med; 1995 May; 23(5):894-900. PubMed ID: 7736748 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Efficacy of antiseptic-impregnated central venous catheters in preventing catheter-related bloodstream infection: a meta-analysis. Veenstra DL; Saint S; Saha S; Lumley T; Sullivan SD JAMA; 1999 Jan; 281(3):261-7. PubMed ID: 9918482 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison of microbial adherence to antiseptic and antibiotic central venous catheters using a novel agar subcutaneous infection model. Gaonkar TA; Modak SM J Antimicrob Chemother; 2003 Sep; 52(3):389-96. PubMed ID: 12917250 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Evaluation of a triple-lumen central venous heparin-coated catheter versus a catheter coated with chlorhexidine and silver sulfadiazine in critically ill patients. Carrasco MN; Bueno A; de las Cuevas C; Jimenez S; Salinas I; Sartorius A; Recio T; Generelo M; Ruiz-Ocaña F Intensive Care Med; 2004 Apr; 30(4):633-8. PubMed ID: 14722639 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Antiseptic-impregnated central venous catheters reduce the incidence of bacterial colonization and associated infection in immunocompromised transplant patients. George SJ; Vuddamalay P; Boscoe MJ Eur J Anaesthesiol; 1997 Jul; 14(4):428-31. PubMed ID: 9253572 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A comparison of two antimicrobial-impregnated central venous catheters. Catheter Study Group. Darouiche RO; Raad II; Heard SO; Thornby JI; Wenker OC; Gabrielli A; Berg J; Khardori N; Hanna H; Hachem R; Harris RL; Mayhall G N Engl J Med; 1999 Jan; 340(1):1-8. PubMed ID: 9878638 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Decreasing catheter colonization through the use of an antiseptic-impregnated catheter: a continuous quality improvement project. Collin GR Chest; 1999 Jun; 115(6):1632-40. PubMed ID: 10378561 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Chlorhexidine-silver sulfadiazine-impregnated central venous catheters: in vitro antibacterial activity and impact on bacterial adhesion. Monzillo V; Corona S; Lanzarini P; Dalla Valle C; Marone P New Microbiol; 2012 Apr; 35(2):175-82. PubMed ID: 22707130 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Clinical studies on the use of antibiotic- and antiseptic-bonded catheters to prevent catheter-related infection. Bach A Zentralbl Bakteriol; 1995 Dec; 283(2):208-14. PubMed ID: 8825112 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The safety of prolonging the use of central venous catheters: a prospective analysis of the effects of using antiseptic-bonded catheters with daily site care. Norwood S; Wilkins HE; Vallina VL; Fernandez LG; McLarty JW Crit Care Med; 2000 May; 28(5):1376-82. PubMed ID: 10834681 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]