These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
118 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8089804)
1. Nuclear quantitative grading by discriminant analysis of renal cell carcinoma samples. A patient survival evaluation. Artacho-Pérula E; Roldán-Villalobos R; Martínez-Cuevas JF; López-Rubio F J Pathol; 1994 Jun; 173(2):105-14. PubMed ID: 8089804 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Volume-weighted mean nuclear volume as a prognostic factor in renal cell carcinoma. Soda T; Fujikawa K; Ito T; Sasaki M; Nishio Y; Miyakawa M Lab Invest; 1999 Jul; 79(7):859-67. PubMed ID: 10418826 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Histological subtyping and nuclear grading of renal cell carcinoma and their implications for survival: a retrospective nation-wide study of 629 patients. Gudbjartsson T; Hardarson S; Petursdottir V; Thoroddsen A; Magnusson J; Einarsson GV Eur Urol; 2005 Oct; 48(4):593-600. PubMed ID: 15964127 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Original and reviewed nuclear grading according to the Fuhrman system: a multivariate analysis of 388 patients with conventional renal cell carcinoma. Ficarra V; Martignoni G; Maffei N; Brunelli M; Novara G; Zanolla L; Pea M; Artibani W Cancer; 2005 Jan; 103(1):68-75. PubMed ID: 15573369 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Role of volume weighted mean nuclear volume for predicting disease outcome in patients with renal cell carcinoma. Fujikawa K; Sasaki M; Aoyama T; Itoh T J Urol; 1997 Apr; 157(4):1237-41. PubMed ID: 9120910 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The role of volume weighted mean nuclear volume in predicting the prognosis of patients with primary transitional cell carcinoma of the upper urinary tract: a report of 102 new cases. Fujikawa K; Matsui Y; Oka H; Fukuzawa S; Sasaki M; Takeuchi H J Urol; 2000 Aug; 164(2):352-5. PubMed ID: 10893583 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Nucleolar grade but not Fuhrman grade is applicable to papillary renal cell carcinoma. Sika-Paotonu D; Bethwaite PB; McCredie MR; William Jordan T; Delahunt B Am J Surg Pathol; 2006 Sep; 30(9):1091-6. PubMed ID: 16931953 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Young age is independent prognostic factor for cancer-specific survival of low-stage clear cell renal cell carcinoma. Jung EJ; Lee HJ; Kwak C; Ku JH; Moon KC Urology; 2009 Jan; 73(1):137-41. PubMed ID: 18950844 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Outcome prediction for renal cell carcinoma: evaluation of prognostic factors for tumours divided according to histological subtype. Delahunt B; Bethwaite PB; Nacey JN Pathology; 2007 Oct; 39(5):459-65. PubMed ID: 17886093 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Fuhrman grading is not appropriate for chromophobe renal cell carcinoma. Delahunt B; Sika-Paotonu D; Bethwaite PB; McCredie MR; Martignoni G; Eble JN; Jordan TW Am J Surg Pathol; 2007 Jun; 31(6):957-60. PubMed ID: 17527087 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. pT1 clear cell renal cell carcinoma: a study of the association between MIB-1 proliferative activity and pathologic features and cancer specific survival. Cheville JC; Zincke H; Lohse CM; Sebo TJ; Riehle D; Weaver AL; Blute ML Cancer; 2002 Apr; 94(8):2180-4. PubMed ID: 12001115 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Chromophobe renal cell carcinoma: histomorphologic characteristics and evaluation of conventional pathologic prognostic parameters in 145 cases. Amin MB; Paner GP; Alvarado-Cabrero I; Young AN; Stricker HJ; Lyles RH; Moch H Am J Surg Pathol; 2008 Dec; 32(12):1822-34. PubMed ID: 18813125 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Relation of microvessel density with microvascular invasion, metastasis and prognosis in renal cell carcinoma. Yildiz E; Ayan S; Goze F; Gokce G; Gultekin EY BJU Int; 2008 Mar; 101(6):758-64. PubMed ID: 18070177 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Percentage of high-grade carcinoma as a prognostic indicator in patients with renal cell carcinoma. Serrano MF; Katz M; Yan Y; Kibel AS; Humphrey PA Cancer; 2008 Aug; 113(3):477-83. PubMed ID: 18484589 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Prognosticfactors in patients with renal cell carcinoma: is TNM (1997) staging relevant in Indian subpopulation? Srivastava A; Mandhani A; Kapoor R; Jain M; Dubey D; Srivastava A; Raghavendra M; Kumar A Indian J Cancer; 2004; 41(3):99-103. PubMed ID: 15472406 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Multicenter determination of optimal interobserver agreement using the Fuhrman grading system for renal cell carcinoma: Assessment of 241 patients with > 15-year follow-up. Lang H; Lindner V; de Fromont M; Molinié V; Letourneux H; Meyer N; Martin M; Jacqmin D Cancer; 2005 Feb; 103(3):625-9. PubMed ID: 15611969 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Prognostic value of renal vein and inferior vena cava involvement in renal cell carcinoma. Wagner B; Patard JJ; Méjean A; Bensalah K; Verhoest G; Zigeuner R; Ficarra V; Tostain J; Mulders P; Chautard D; Descotes JL; de la Taille A; Salomon L; Prayer-Galetti T; Cindolo L; Valéri A; Meyer N; Jacqmin D; Lang H Eur Urol; 2009 Feb; 55(2):452-9. PubMed ID: 18692951 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]