These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

130 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8090395)

  • 1. Repeat cesareans: how many are elective?
    Gregory KD; Henry OA; Gellens AJ; Hobel CJ; Platt LD
    Obstet Gynecol; 1994 Oct; 84(4):574-8. PubMed ID: 8090395
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Repeat cesarean delivery: what indications are recorded in the medical chart?
    Lydon-Rochelle MT; Gardella C; Cárdenas V; Easterling TR
    Birth; 2006 Mar; 33(1):4-11. PubMed ID: 16499526
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The Jordanian cesarean section rate.
    Hindawi IM; Meri ZB
    Saudi Med J; 2004 Nov; 25(11):1631-5. PubMed ID: 15573191
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Primary and repeat caesarean sections: comparison of indications.
    Abu-Heija A; Zayed F
    J Obstet Gynaecol; 1998 Sep; 18(5):432-4. PubMed ID: 15512137
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Maternal and neonatal morbidity after elective repeat Cesarean delivery versus a trial of labor after previous Cesarean delivery in a community teaching hospital.
    Loebel G; Zelop CM; Egan JF; Wax J
    J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2004 Apr; 15(4):243-6. PubMed ID: 15280132
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Risk of uterine rupture with a trial of labor in women with multiple and single prior cesarean delivery.
    Landon MB; Spong CY; Thom E; Hauth JC; Bloom SL; Varner MW; Moawad AH; Caritis SN; Harper M; Wapner RJ; Sorokin Y; Miodovnik M; Carpenter M; Peaceman AM; O'sullivan MJ; Sibai BM; Langer O; Thorp JM; Ramin SM; Mercer BM; Gabbe SG;
    Obstet Gynecol; 2006 Jul; 108(1):12-20. PubMed ID: 16816050
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Risks preceding increased primary cesarean birth rates.
    Sokol RJ; Rosen MG; Bottoms SF; Chik L
    Obstet Gynecol; 1982 Mar; 59(3):340-6. PubMed ID: 7078881
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Repeat cesarean section: a necessary procedure?].
    Lira Plascencia J; Tiscareño Barajas A; Duque Segundino Y; Coria Soto I; Zambrana Castañeda M; Ibargüengoitia Ochoa F; García-Benítez CQ
    Ginecol Obstet Mex; 2000 May; 68():218-23. PubMed ID: 10902291
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Risk of uterine rupture and adverse perinatal outcome at term after cesarean delivery.
    Spong CY; Landon MB; Gilbert S; Rouse DJ; Leveno KJ; Varner MW; Moawad AH; Simhan HN; Harper M; Wapner RJ; Sorokin Y; Miodovnik M; Carpenter M; Peaceman AM; O'Sullivan MJ; Sibai BM; Langer O; Thorp JM; Ramin SM; Mercer BM;
    Obstet Gynecol; 2007 Oct; 110(4):801-7. PubMed ID: 17906012
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Trial of labor or repeat cesarean delivery in women with morbid obesity and previous cesarean delivery.
    Hibbard JU; Gilbert S; Landon MB; Hauth JC; Leveno KJ; Spong CY; Varner MW; Caritis SN; Harper M; Wapner RJ; Sorokin Y; Miodovnik M; Carpenter M; Peaceman AM; O'Sullivan MJ; Sibai BM; Langer O; Thorp JM; Ramin SM; Mercer BM; Gabbe SG;
    Obstet Gynecol; 2006 Jul; 108(1):125-33. PubMed ID: 16816066
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Cesarean section on request at 39 weeks: impact on shoulder dystocia, fetal trauma, neonatal encephalopathy, and intrauterine fetal demise.
    Hankins GD; Clark SM; Munn MB
    Semin Perinatol; 2006 Oct; 30(5):276-87. PubMed ID: 17011400
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A national estimate of the elective primary cesarean delivery rate.
    Meikle SF; Steiner CA; Zhang J; Lawrence WL
    Obstet Gynecol; 2005 Apr; 105(4):751-6. PubMed ID: 15802401
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Recommendations for routine reporting on indications for cesarean delivery in developing countries.
    Stanton C; Ronsmans C;
    Birth; 2008 Sep; 35(3):204-11. PubMed ID: 18844646
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Trends in the frequency of cesarean delivery. A 21-year experience, 1970-1990.
    Eskew PN; Saywell RM; Zollinger TW; Erner BK; Oser TL
    J Reprod Med; 1994 Oct; 39(10):809-17. PubMed ID: 7837129
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Cesarean section: analysis of the experience before and after the National Consensus Conference on Aspects of Cesarean Birth.
    Soliman SR; Burrows RF
    CMAJ; 1993 Apr; 148(8):1315-20. PubMed ID: 8462053
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Can the rate of cesarean section be reduced?
    Mesleh RA; Kurdi AM; Ayoub HS
    Saudi Med J; 2000 Nov; 21(11):1054-8. PubMed ID: 11360068
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Using ICD-9 codes to identify indications for primary and repeat cesarean sections: agreement with clinical records.
    Henry OA; Gregory KD; Hobel CJ; Platt LD
    Am J Public Health; 1995 Aug; 85(8 Pt 1):1143-6. PubMed ID: 7625515
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Changes in indications for cesarean delivery: United States, 1985 and 1994.
    Gregory KD; Curtin SC; Taffel SM; Notzon FC
    Am J Public Health; 1998 Sep; 88(9):1384-7. PubMed ID: 9736883
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Predictive factors of the delivery method in women with cesarean section scars].
    Lehmann M; Hedelin G; Sorgue C; Göllner JL; Grall C; Chami A; Collin D
    J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris); 1999 Jul; 28(4):358-68. PubMed ID: 10480067
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Mode of delivery for the morbidly obese with prior cesarean delivery: vaginal versus repeat cesarean section.
    Chauhan SP; Magann EF; Carroll CS; Barrilleaux PS; Scardo JA; Martin JN
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2001 Aug; 185(2):349-54. PubMed ID: 11518890
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.