These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

131 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8090462)

  • 1. Does saving time using FASTPAC or suprathreshold testing reduce quality of visual fields?
    Mills RP; Barnebey HS; Migliazzo CV; Li Y
    Ophthalmology; 1994 Sep; 101(9):1596-603. PubMed ID: 8090462
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Evaluation of FASTPAC, a new strategy for threshold estimation with the Humphrey Field Analyzer, in a glaucomatous population.
    Flanagan JG; Wild JM; Trope GE
    Ophthalmology; 1993 Jun; 100(6):949-54. PubMed ID: 8510911
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparison between Fastpac and conventional Humphrey perimetry.
    Young IM; Rait JL; Guest CS; Carson CA; Taylor HR
    Aust N Z J Ophthalmol; 1994 May; 22(2):95-9. PubMed ID: 7917272
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Evaluation of a new perimetric threshold strategy, SITA, in patients with manifest and suspect glaucoma.
    Bengtsson B; Heijl A
    Acta Ophthalmol Scand; 1998 Jun; 76(3):268-72. PubMed ID: 9686835
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Glaucomatous visual fields. FASTPAC versus full threshold strategy of the Humphrey Field Analyzer.
    Schaumberger M; Schäfer B; Lachenmayr BJ
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 1995 Jun; 36(7):1390-7. PubMed ID: 7775117
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Quantitative comparison of static perimetric strategies in early glaucoma: test-retest variability.
    Spry PG; Henson DB; Sparrow JM; North RV
    J Glaucoma; 2000 Jun; 9(3):247-53. PubMed ID: 10877376
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Evaluation of FASTPAC: a new strategy for threshold estimation with the Humphrey Field Analyser.
    Flanagan JG; Moss ID; Wild JM; Hudson C; Prokopich L; Whitaker D; O'Neill EC
    Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 1993 Aug; 231(8):465-9. PubMed ID: 8224946
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. SITA Fast, a new rapid perimetric threshold test. Description of methods and evaluation in patients with manifest and suspect glaucoma.
    Bengtsson B; Heijl A
    Acta Ophthalmol Scand; 1998 Aug; 76(4):431-7. PubMed ID: 9716329
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Evaluation of the Humphrey FASTPAC threshold program in glaucoma.
    O'Brien C; Poinoosawmy D; Wu J; Hitchings R
    Br J Ophthalmol; 1994 Jul; 78(7):516-9. PubMed ID: 7918261
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Static threshold visual field in glaucoma with the Fastpac algorithm of the Humphrey Field Analyser. Is the gain in examination time offset by any loss of information?
    Nordmann JP; Denis P; Nguer Y; Mouton-Chopin D; Saraux H
    Eur J Ophthalmol; 1994; 4(2):105-10. PubMed ID: 7950333
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Fastpac visual field screening.
    Young IM; Rait JL; Carson CA; Taylor HR
    Ophthalmic Epidemiol; 1995 Dec; 2(3):117-21. PubMed ID: 8963914
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Multisampling suprathreshold perimetry: a comparison with conventional suprathreshold and full-threshold strategies by computer simulation.
    Artes PH; Henson DB; Harper R; McLeod D
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2003 Jun; 44(6):2582-7. PubMed ID: 12766060
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The SITA perimetric threshold algorithms in glaucoma.
    Wild JM; Pacey IE; O'Neill EC; Cunliffe IA
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 1999 Aug; 40(9):1998-2009. PubMed ID: 10440254
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Evaluation of baseline-related suprathreshold testing for quick determination of visual field nonprogression.
    Araujo ML; Feuer WJ; Anderson DR
    Arch Ophthalmol; 1993 Mar; 111(3):365-9. PubMed ID: 8447748
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A new rapid threshold algorithm for short-wavelength automated perimetry.
    Bengtsson B
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2003 Mar; 44(3):1388-94. PubMed ID: 12601072
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Automated suprathreshold static perimetry screening for detecting neuro-ophthalmologic disease.
    Siatkowski RM; Lam BL; Anderson DR; Feuer WJ; Halikman AM
    Ophthalmology; 1996 Jun; 103(6):907-17. PubMed ID: 8643246
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Sensitivity and specificity of the Swedish interactive threshold algorithm for glaucomatous visual field defects.
    Budenz DL; Rhee P; Feuer WJ; McSoley J; Johnson CA; Anderson DR
    Ophthalmology; 2002 Jun; 109(6):1052-8. PubMed ID: 12045043
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The efficacy of the dicon screening field to detect eyes with glaucomatous field loss by Humphrey threshold testing.
    Huang AS; Smith SD; Quigley HA
    J Glaucoma; 1998 Jun; 7(3):158-64. PubMed ID: 9627854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Sensitivity and specificity of the 76-suprathreshold visual field test to detect eyes with visual field defect by Humphrey threshold testing in a population-based setting: the Thessaloniki eye study.
    Topouzis F; Coleman AL; Yu F; Mavroudis L; Anastasopoulos E; Koskosas A; Pappas T; Dimitrakos S; Wilson MR
    Am J Ophthalmol; 2004 Mar; 137(3):420-5. PubMed ID: 15013863
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparing significance and magnitude of glaucomatous visual field defects using the SITA and Full Threshold strategies.
    Bengtsson B; Heijl A
    Acta Ophthalmol Scand; 1999 Apr; 77(2):143-6. PubMed ID: 10321527
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.