These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

126 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8090462)

  • 41. Identification of glaucoma-related visual field abnormality with the screening protocol of frequency doubling technology.
    Quigley HA
    Am J Ophthalmol; 1998 Jun; 125(6):819-29. PubMed ID: 9645719
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Properties of perimetric threshold estimates from Full Threshold, SITA Standard, and SITA Fast strategies.
    Artes PH; Iwase A; Ohno Y; Kitazawa Y; Chauhan BC
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2002 Aug; 43(8):2654-9. PubMed ID: 12147599
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Combining perimetric suprathreshold and threshold procedures to reduce measurement variability in areas of visual field loss.
    McKendrick AM; Turpin A
    Optom Vis Sci; 2005 Jan; 82(1):43-51. PubMed ID: 15630403
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Sensitivity and specificity of frequency-doubling technology, tendency-oriented perimetry, and Humphrey Swedish interactive threshold algorithm-fast perimetry in a glaucoma practice.
    Wadood AC; Azuara-Blanco A; Aspinall P; Taguri A; King AJ
    Am J Ophthalmol; 2002 Mar; 133(3):327-32. PubMed ID: 11860968
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Performance of the Moorfields motion displacement test for identifying eyes with glaucoma.
    Ong EL; Zheng Y; Aung T; Tan L; Cheng CY; Wong TY; How A
    Ophthalmology; 2014 Jan; 121(1):88-92. PubMed ID: 24139154
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Evaluation of Functional Visual Acuity in Glaucoma Patients.
    Ozeki N; Yuki K; Shiba D; Tsubota K
    J Glaucoma; 2017 Mar; 26(3):223-226. PubMed ID: 27841797
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Spatial and temporal processing of threshold data for detection of progressive glaucomatous visual field loss.
    Spry PG; Johnson CA; Bates AB; Turpin A; Chauhan BC
    Arch Ophthalmol; 2002 Feb; 120(2):173-80. PubMed ID: 11831919
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Automated suprathreshold screening for glaucoma: the Baltimore Eye Survey.
    Katz J; Tielsch JM; Quigley HA; Javitt J; Witt K; Sommer A
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 1993 Nov; 34(12):3271-7. PubMed ID: 8225862
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Clinical alternative for reducing the time needed to perform automated threshold perimetry.
    Fingeret M
    J Am Optom Assoc; 1995 Nov; 66(11):699-705. PubMed ID: 8576535
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Spatial analyses of glaucomatous visual fields; a comparison with traditional visual field indices.
    Asman P; Heijl A; Olsson J; Rootzén H
    Acta Ophthalmol (Copenh); 1992 Oct; 70(5):679-86. PubMed ID: 1471495
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Simulations for FASTPAC and the standard 4-2 dB full-threshold strategy of the Humphrey Field Analyzer.
    Glass E; Schaumberger M; Lachenmayr BJ
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 1995 Aug; 36(9):1847-54. PubMed ID: 7635658
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Glaucoma Hemifield Test. Automated visual field evaluation.
    Asman P; Heijl A
    Arch Ophthalmol; 1992 Jun; 110(6):812-9. PubMed ID: 1596230
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Progression of early glaucomatous visual field loss as detected by blue-on-yellow and standard white-on-white automated perimetry.
    Johnson CA; Adams AJ; Casson EJ; Brandt JD
    Arch Ophthalmol; 1993 May; 111(5):651-6. PubMed ID: 8489448
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Advanced Glaucoma Intervention Study. 2. Visual field test scoring and reliability.
    Ophthalmology; 1994 Aug; 101(8):1445-55. PubMed ID: 7741836
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Screening for glaucomatous visual field loss with frequency-doubling perimetry.
    Johnson CA; Samuels SJ
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 1997 Feb; 38(2):413-25. PubMed ID: 9040475
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Oculokinetic perimetry compared with Humphrey visual field analysis in the detection of glaucomatous visual field loss.
    Wishart PK
    Eye (Lond); 1993; 7 ( Pt 1)():113-21. PubMed ID: 8325400
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Improving the sensitivity of the OKP visual field screening test with the use of neutral density filters.
    Vernon SA; Quigley HA
    Eye (Lond); 1994; 8 ( Pt 4)():406-9. PubMed ID: 7821461
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Estimating progression of visual field loss in glaucoma.
    Katz J; Gilbert D; Quigley HA; Sommer A
    Ophthalmology; 1997 Jun; 104(6):1017-25. PubMed ID: 9186444
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Measurement error of visual field tests in glaucoma.
    Spry PG; Johnson CA; McKendrick AM; Turpin A
    Br J Ophthalmol; 2003 Jan; 87(1):107-12. PubMed ID: 12488273
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Frequency-doubling threshold perimetry in predicting glaucoma in a population-based study: The Beijing Eye Study.
    Wang YX; Xu L; Zhang RX; Jonas JB
    Arch Ophthalmol; 2007 Oct; 125(10):1402-6. PubMed ID: 17923550
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.