These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
2. A strategy of win-stay, lose-shift that outperforms tit-for-tat in the Prisoner's Dilemma game. Nowak M; Sigmund K Nature; 1993 Jul; 364(6432):56-8. PubMed ID: 8316296 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Human cooperation in the simultaneous and the alternating Prisoner's Dilemma: Pavlov versus Generous Tit-for-Tat. Wedekind C; Milinski M Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 1996 Apr; 93(7):2686-9. PubMed ID: 11607644 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Optimality under noise: higher memory strategies for the alternating prisoner's dilemma. Neill DB J Theor Biol; 2001 Jul; 211(2):159-80. PubMed ID: 11419957 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The spatial struggle of tit-for-tat and defect. Hutson VC; Vickers GT Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci; 1995 Jun; 348(1326):393-404. PubMed ID: 7480111 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. No strategy is evolutionarily stable in the repeated prisoner's dilemma. Lorberbaum J J Theor Biol; 1994 May; 168(2):117-30. PubMed ID: 8022193 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Behavior-dependent contexts for repeated plays of the Prisoner's Dilemma: II. Dynamical aspects of the evolution of cooperation. Feldman MW; Thomas EA J Theor Biol; 1987 Oct; 128(3):297-315. PubMed ID: 3444341 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Win-stay, lose-shift strategies for repeated games-memory length, aspiration levels and noise. Posch M J Theor Biol; 1999 May; 198(2):183-95. PubMed ID: 10339393 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The continuous Prisoner's dilemma: II. Linear reactive strategies with noise. Wahl LM; Nowak MA J Theor Biol; 1999 Oct; 200(3):323-38. PubMed ID: 10527721 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Contingencies of reinforcement in a five-person prisoner's dilemma. Yi R; Rachlin H J Exp Anal Behav; 2004 Sep; 82(2):161-76. PubMed ID: 15540503 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Invading wave of cooperation in a spatial iterated prisoner's dilemma. Ferriere R; Michod RE Proc Biol Sci; 1995 Jan; 259(1354):77-83. PubMed ID: 7700879 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Direct reciprocity with costly punishment: generous tit-for-tat prevails. Rand DG; Ohtsuki H; Nowak MA J Theor Biol; 2009 Jan; 256(1):45-57. PubMed ID: 18938180 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Spatialization and greater generosity in the stochastic Prisoner's Dilemma. Grim P Biosystems; 1996; 37(1-2):3-17. PubMed ID: 8924636 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Win-Stay-Lose-Shift as a self-confirming equilibrium in the iterated Prisoner's Dilemma. Kim M; Choi JK; Baek SK Proc Biol Sci; 2021 Jun; 288(1953):20211021. PubMed ID: 34187189 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Individual differences in game motivation as moderators of preprogrammed strategy effects in prisoner's dilemma. Kuhlman DM; Marshello AF J Pers Soc Psychol; 1975 Nov; 32(5):922-31. PubMed ID: 1185519 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Emergence and suppression of cooperation by action visibility in transparent games. Unakafov AM; Schultze T; Gail A; Moeller S; Kagan I; Eule S; Wolf F PLoS Comput Biol; 2020 Jan; 16(1):e1007588. PubMed ID: 31917809 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The continuous prisoner's dilemma and the evolution of cooperation through reciprocal altruism with variable investment. Killingback T; Doebeli M Am Nat; 2002 Oct; 160(4):421-38. PubMed ID: 18707520 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Cooperative responses in rats playing a 2 × 2 game: Effects of opponent strategy, payoff, and oxytocin. Donovan A; Ryan E; Wood RI Psychoneuroendocrinology; 2020 Nov; 121():104803. PubMed ID: 32755813 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]