BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

72 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8090894)

  • 1. Measurement of internal carotid artery stenosis from source MR angiograms.
    Anderson CM; Lee RE; Levin DL; de la Torre Alonso S; Saloner D
    Radiology; 1994 Oct; 193(1):219-26. PubMed ID: 8090894
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Prospective evaluation of extracranial carotid stenosis: MR angiography with maximum-intensity projections and multiplanar reformation compared with conventional angiography.
    De Marco JK; Nesbit GM; Wesbey GE; Richardson D
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1994 Nov; 163(5):1205-12. PubMed ID: 7976902
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Carotid artery stenosis: intraindividual correlations of 3D time-of-flight MR angiography, contrast-enhanced MR angiography, conventional DSA, and rotational angiography for detection and grading.
    Anzalone N; Scomazzoni F; Castellano R; Strada L; Righi C; Politi LS; Kirchin MA; Chiesa R; Scotti G
    Radiology; 2005 Jul; 236(1):204-13. PubMed ID: 15955853
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Multidirectional depiction of internal carotid arterial stenosis: three-dimensional time-of-flight MR angiography versus rotational and conventional digital subtraction angiography.
    Elgersma OE; Wüst AF; Buijs PC; van Der Graaf Y; Eikelboom BC; Mali WP
    Radiology; 2000 Aug; 216(2):511-6. PubMed ID: 10924579
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Contrast-enhanced 3D MR DSA of the carotid artery bifurcation: preliminary study of comparison with unenhanced 2D and 3D time-of-flight MR angiography.
    Willig DS; Turski PA; Frayne R; Graves VB; Korosec FR; Swan JS; Mistretta CA; Grist TM
    Radiology; 1998 Aug; 208(2):447-51. PubMed ID: 9680574
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Detection of internal carotid artery stenosis: comparison of MR angiography, color Doppler sonography, and arteriography.
    Polak JF; Bajakian RL; O'Leary DH; Anderson MR; Donaldson MC; Jolesz FA
    Radiology; 1992 Jan; 182(1):35-40. PubMed ID: 1727306
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [MR-angiography and duplex-ultrasonography: predictive reliability for angiographically determined internal carotid artery stenosis >/= 70-99%].
    Wölfle KD; Schnur C; Pfadenhauer K; Bruijnen H; Bohndorf K; Loeprecht H
    Zentralbl Chir; 2002 Feb; 127(2):81-8. PubMed ID: 11894206
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Carotid artery stenosis: accuracy of contrast-enhanced MR angiography for diagnosis.
    Nederkoorn PJ; Elgersma OE; van der Graaf Y; Eikelboom BC; Kappelle LJ; Mali WP
    Radiology; 2003 Sep; 228(3):677-82. PubMed ID: 12869686
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Carotid artery stenosis: clinical efficacy of two-dimensional time-of-flight MR angiography.
    Heiserman JE; Drayer BP; Fram EK; Keller PJ; Bird CR; Hodak JA; Flom RA
    Radiology; 1992 Mar; 182(3):761-8. PubMed ID: 1535891
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Detection of internal carotid artery stenosis. Comparison of 2D-MR angiography, duplex scanning, and arteriography.
    Spartera C; Morettini G; Marino G; Marsili L; Di Cesare E; La Barbera G; Petrassi C; Ventura M
    J Cardiovasc Surg (Torino); 1993 Jun; 34(3):209-13. PubMed ID: 8344970
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Internal carotid artery stenosis measurements from 3D reconstructed multi-directional views using phantom data set on MRA image sequence.
    Kim DY; Park JW
    Eur J Radiol; 2009 Oct; 72(1):65-74. PubMed ID: 18619751
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Proximal great vessels of aortic arch: comparison of three-dimensional gadolinium-enhanced MR angiography and digital subtraction angiography.
    Randoux B; Marro B; Koskas F; Chiras J; Dormont D; Marsault C
    Radiology; 2003 Dec; 229(3):697-702. PubMed ID: 14563902
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Screening patients for renal artery stenosis: value of three-dimensional time-of-flight MR angiography.
    Loubeyre P; Revel D; Garcia P; Delignette A; Canet E; Chirossel P; Genin G; Amiel M
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1994 Apr; 162(4):847-52. PubMed ID: 8141006
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparison of intra-arterial digital subtraction angiography, magnetic resonance angiography and duplex ultrasonography for measuring carotid artery stenosis.
    Modaresi KB; Cox TC; Summers PE; Jarosz JM; Verma H; Taylor PR; Padayachee TS
    Br J Surg; 1999 Nov; 86(11):1422-6. PubMed ID: 10583289
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Evaluation of classic 2D time-of-flight MR angiography in the depiction of severe carotid stenosis.
    DeMarco JK; Huston J; Bernstein MA
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2004 Sep; 183(3):787-93. PubMed ID: 15333371
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Carotid artery: prospective blinded comparison of two-dimensional time-of-flight MR angiography with conventional angiography and duplex US.
    Huston J; Lewis BD; Wiebers DO; Meyer FB; Riederer SJ; Weaver AL
    Radiology; 1993 Feb; 186(2):339-44. PubMed ID: 8421731
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Intracranial vascular stenosis and occlusion: diagnostic accuracy of three-dimensional, Fourier transform, time-of-flight MR angiography.
    Korogi Y; Takahashi M; Mabuchi N; Miki H; Shiga H; Watabe T; O'Uchi T; Nakagawa T; Horikawa Y; Fujiwara S
    Radiology; 1994 Oct; 193(1):187-93. PubMed ID: 8090890
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Diagnosis of carotid artery disease: preliminary experience with maximum-intensity-projection spiral CT angiography.
    Marks MP; Napel S; Jordan JE; Enzmann DR
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1993 Jun; 160(6):1267-71. PubMed ID: 8498231
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. High-spatial-resolution MR angiography of renal arteries with integrated parallel acquisitions: comparison with digital subtraction angiography and US.
    Schoenberg SO; Rieger J; Weber CH; Michaely HJ; Waggershauser T; Ittrich C; Dietrich O; Reiser MF
    Radiology; 2005 May; 235(2):687-98. PubMed ID: 15770035
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Internal carotid artery stenosis measurement: comparison of 3D computed rotational angiography and conventional digital subtraction angiography.
    Hyde DE; Fox AJ; Gulka I; Kalapos P; Lee DH; Pelz DM; Holdsworth DW
    Stroke; 2004 Dec; 35(12):2776-81. PubMed ID: 15514196
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.