BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

215 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8090958)

  • 1. [Evaluation of amalgam separators].
    Surmont P; Enödy E
    Rev Belge Med Dent (1984); 1993; 48(4):17-26. PubMed ID: 8090958
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Mercury recovery in situ of four different dental amalgam separators.
    Hylander LD; Lindvall A; Uhrberg R; Gahnberg L; Lindh U
    Sci Total Environ; 2006 Jul; 366(1):320-36. PubMed ID: 16182343
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The effect of amalgam separators on mercury loading to wastewater treatment plants.
    Stone ME
    J Calif Dent Assoc; 2004 Jul; 32(7):593-600. PubMed ID: 15468541
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The use of CDA best management practices and amalgam separators to improve the management of dental wastewater.
    Condrin AK
    J Calif Dent Assoc; 2004 Jul; 32(7):583-92. PubMed ID: 15468540
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Estimated quantity of mercury in amalgam waste water residue released by dentists into the sewerage system in Ontario, Canada.
    Adegbembo AO; Watson PA
    J Can Dent Assoc; 2004 Dec; 70(11):759, 759a-759f. PubMed ID: 15588550
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The weight of wastes generated by removal of dental amalgam restorations and the concentration of mercury in dental wastewater.
    Adegbembo AO; Watson PA; Lugowski SJ
    J Can Dent Assoc; 2002 Oct; 68(9):553-8. PubMed ID: 12366886
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Evaluating amalgam separators using an international standard.
    Batchu H; Rakowski D; Fan PL; Meyer DM
    J Am Dent Assoc; 2006 Jul; 137(7):999-1005. PubMed ID: 16803827
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The mercury burden in waste water released from dental clinics.
    al-Shraideh M; al-Wahadni A; Khasawneh S; al-Shraideh MJ
    SADJ; 2002 Jun; 57(6):213-5. PubMed ID: 12229075
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Cost-effectiveness of removing amalgam from dental wastewater.
    Vandeven JA; McGinnis SL
    J Calif Dent Assoc; 2004 Jul; 32(7):564-73. PubMed ID: 15468537
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. High mercury emissions from dental clinics despite amalgam separators.
    Hylander LD; Lindvall A; Gahnberg L
    Sci Total Environ; 2006 Jun; 362(1-3):74-84. PubMed ID: 16054673
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Laboratory evaluation of amalgam separators.
    Fan PL; Batchu H; Chou HN; Gasparac W; Sandrik J; Meyer DM
    J Am Dent Assoc; 2002 May; 133(5):577-84; quiz 623-5. PubMed ID: 12036162
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Particle versus mercury removal efficiency of amalgam separators.
    Drummond JL; Liu Y; Wu TY; Cailas MD
    J Dent; 2003 Jan; 31(1):51-8. PubMed ID: 12615020
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Understanding the mercury reduction issue: the impact of mercury on the environment and human health.
    Kao RT; Dault S; Pichay T
    J Calif Dent Assoc; 2004 Jul; 32(7):574-9. PubMed ID: 15468538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Use of inductively coupled plasma-emission spectroscopy and mercury vapor analyses to evaluate elemental release from a high-copper dental amalgam: a pilot study.
    Cohen BI; Penugonda B
    J Prosthet Dent; 2001 Apr; 85(4):409-12. PubMed ID: 11319540
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Amalgam separators: nearly half are defective! The results of a survey].
    Walther K
    Rev Belge Med Dent (1984); 1993; 48(4):27-34. PubMed ID: 8090959
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Bumble bee: my nemesis.
    Carney KK
    J Calif Dent Assoc; 2011 Jun; 39(6):353, 356. PubMed ID: 21823492
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Dental amalgam: effects of alloy/mercury mixing ratio, uses and waste management.
    Kefi I; Maria A; Majid Z; Sana J; Afreen M; Fareed M; Feroze A; Sajid H; Adel S; Iftikhar A; Yawer A; Kaleem M
    J Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad; 2011; 23(4):43-5. PubMed ID: 23472410
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Putting dental mercury pollution into perspective.
    Jones DW
    Br Dent J; 2004 Aug; 197(4):175-7. PubMed ID: 15375402
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. What you need to know about the new amalgam separator requirements: part one.
    Verhagen C; Ruddell P
    J Mich Dent Assoc; 2009 Jun; 91(6):40, 42-3. PubMed ID: 19591417
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [What efforts are being made by dentists in the Flemish region for the limiting of amalgam rejection? A study conducted on a representative sample of 373 Flemish dentists on the subject of amalgam waste: extent of the problem, waste management and foreseeable solutions].
    Deliens L; De Deyn B
    Rev Belge Med Dent (1984); 1993; 48(4):35-43. PubMed ID: 8090960
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.