These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
226 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8093158)
1. Failed validation of a clinical decision rule for the use of radiography in acute ankle injury. Kelly AM; Richards D; Kerr L; Grant J; O'Donovan P; Basire K; Graham R N Z Med J; 1994 Jul; 107(982):294-5. PubMed ID: 8093158 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Evaluation of the Ottawa clinical decision rules for the use of radiography in acute ankle and midfoot injuries in the emergency department: an independent site assessment. Pigman EC; Klug RK; Sanford S; Jolly BT Ann Emerg Med; 1994 Jul; 24(1):41-5. PubMed ID: 7912053 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison of diagnostic decision rules and structured data collection in assessment of acute ankle injury. Glas AS; Pijnenburg BA; Lijmer JG; Bogaard K; de RM; Keeman JN; Butzelaar RM; Bossuyt PM CMAJ; 2002 Mar; 166(6):727-33. PubMed ID: 11944759 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Prospective validation of a decision rule for the use of radiography in acute knee injuries. Stiell IG; Greenberg GH; Wells GA; McDowell I; Cwinn AA; Smith NA; Cacciotti TF; Sivilotti ML JAMA; 1996 Feb; 275(8):611-5. PubMed ID: 8594242 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Implementation of the Ottawa ankle rule in a university sports medicine center. Leddy JJ; Kesari A; Smolinski RJ Med Sci Sports Exerc; 2002 Jan; 34(1):57-62. PubMed ID: 11782648 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Utilization of radiographs for the diagnosis of ankle fractures in Kingston, Ontario, Canada. Dowdall H; Gee M; Brison RJ; Pickett W Acad Emerg Med; 2011 May; 18(5):555-8. PubMed ID: 21545671 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [Usefulness of Ottawa rules for acute injuries of ankle and foot]. Palapa García LR; Regla Márquez H Rev Med Inst Mex Seguro Soc; 2005; 43(4):293-8. PubMed ID: 16164846 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Decision rules for the use of radiography in acute ankle injuries. Refinement and prospective validation. Stiell IG; Greenberg GH; McKnight RD; Nair RC; McDowell I; Reardon M; Stewart JP; Maloney J JAMA; 1993 Mar; 269(9):1127-32. PubMed ID: 8433468 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Decision rules for roentgenography of children with acute ankle injuries. Chande VT Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med; 1995 Mar; 149(3):255-8. PubMed ID: 7858683 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Validation of the Ottawa ankle rules. Experience at a community hospital. McBride KL Can Fam Physician; 1997 Mar; 43():459-65. PubMed ID: 9116517 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparison of Ottawa ankle rules and current local guidelines for use of radiography in acute ankle injuries. Keogh SP; Shafi A; Wijetunge DB J R Coll Surg Edinb; 1998 Oct; 43(5):341-3. PubMed ID: 9803109 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Sensitivity of the Ottawa rules. Lucchesi GM; Jackson RE; Peacock WF; Cerasani C; Swor RA Ann Emerg Med; 1995 Jul; 26(1):1-5. PubMed ID: 7793707 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Multicentre trial to introduce the Ottawa ankle rules for use of radiography in acute ankle injuries. Multicentre Ankle Rule Study Group. Stiell I; Wells G; Laupacis A; Brison R; Verbeek R; Vandemheen K; Naylor CD BMJ; 1995 Sep; 311(7005):594-7. PubMed ID: 7663253 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Prospective validation and head-to-head comparison of 3 ankle rules in a pediatric population. Gravel J; Hedrei P; Grimard G; Gouin S Ann Emerg Med; 2009 Oct; 54(4):534-540.e1. PubMed ID: 19647341 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A prospective study of modified Ottawa ankle rules in a military population. Interobserver agreement between physical therapists and orthopaedic surgeons. Springer BA; Arciero RA; Tenuta JJ; Taylor DC Am J Sports Med; 2000; 28(6):864-8. PubMed ID: 11101110 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Prospective evaluation of the Ottawa Ankle Rules in a university sports medicine center. With a modification to increase specificity for identifying malleolar fractures. Leddy JJ; Smolinski RJ; Lawrence J; Snyder JL; Priore RL Am J Sports Med; 1998; 26(2):158-65. PubMed ID: 9548106 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A study to develop clinical decision rules for the use of radiography in acute ankle injuries. Stiell IG; Greenberg GH; McKnight RD; Nair RC; McDowell I; Worthington JR Ann Emerg Med; 1992 Apr; 21(4):384-90. PubMed ID: 1554175 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Validation of the Ottawa ankle rules in France: a study in the surgical emergency department of a teaching hospital. Auleley GR; Kerboull L; Durieux P; Cosquer M; Courpied JP; Ravaud P Ann Emerg Med; 1998 Jul; 32(1):14-8. PubMed ID: 9656943 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Validation of the Sonographic Ottawa Foot and Ankle Rules (SOFAR) Study in a Large Urban Trauma Center. Tollefson B; Nichols J; Fromang S; Summers RL J Miss State Med Assoc; 2016 Feb; 57(2):35-8. PubMed ID: 27141765 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]